Loading…

Assessing Milankovitch forcing in disconformity‐prone cyclic shallow‐water carbonates, Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), Adriatic Platform, Croatia

Most Upper Jurassic studies of astronomical forcing have focused on deeper‐water sections which are relatively continuous. An Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) section on the greenhouse Adriatic Carbonate Platform, Croatia, was studied to determine if astronomical forcing can be recognized in a 5.8 ± 0....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sedimentology 2022-06, Vol.69 (4), p.1789-1815
Main Authors: Husinec, Antun, Read, J. Fred, Hu, Xiumian
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3203-2760037f72ef22f1a88e54e399a04dd48ca53cb60f34660a4f6c3284ff4b4b2f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3203-2760037f72ef22f1a88e54e399a04dd48ca53cb60f34660a4f6c3284ff4b4b2f3
container_end_page 1815
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1789
container_title Sedimentology
container_volume 69
creator Husinec, Antun
Read, J. Fred
Hu, Xiumian
description Most Upper Jurassic studies of astronomical forcing have focused on deeper‐water sections which are relatively continuous. An Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) section on the greenhouse Adriatic Carbonate Platform, Croatia, was studied to determine if astronomical forcing can be recognized in a 5.8 ± 0.1 Myr duration, disconformity‐prone shallow platform succession. The succession consists of metre‐scale subtidal parasequences intermixed with peritidal parasequences, and intermittent subaerial breccias at sequence boundaries. Ages were constrained by biostratigraphy and δ13C chemostratigraphy, and most sequence boundaries appear to match those of the coastal onlap curve of Haq (2018). Logged sections were converted into depth–rank time series and parasequence–thickness time series. Accumulation rates were statistically evaluated for the rank series against an astronomical‐forcing model, and compared with long‐term accumulation rates (thickness divided by time). The statistical rates were used to select the ca 100 kyr eccentricity cycle to tune the series. Spectral analysis showed peaks at ca 400 kyr (superbundles) and ca 100 kyr (bundles), along with obliquity (38 kyr and 27 kyr) and precessional (18−22 kyr) cycles (parasequences). The Kimmeridgian sequences are ca 400 kyr, ca 800 kyr and ca 1.1 Myr duration. Sequence scale (0.4 to 1.2 Myr) stratigraphic completeness based on statistical accumulation rates versus long‐term rates is ca 60%. This study estimates ca 1 Myr missing time in parasequences stacked into superbundles and 1.6 Myr in four major sequence boundaries. Given that the Kimmeridgian was the hottest time of the Middle and Late Jurassic, aquifer eustasy may have influenced the timing of sequence boundaries, although documented late Kimmeridgian cooling could have triggered a glacio‐eustatic component.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sed.12973
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2667004170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2667004170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3203-2760037f72ef22f1a88e54e399a04dd48ca53cb60f34660a4f6c3284ff4b4b2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4AaW2IDUtH7VSZZVKc8ikKDryHHs1iWJi51SZccRWHBCToJL2eKNrW8-z2h-AE4x6uNwBl4VfUzSmO6BDqZ8GFGU4n3QQYjGEYoZPwRH3i8RwpwlaQd8jbxX3pt6Dh9MKepX-24auYDaOrmFpoaF8dLWAVSmab8_PlfO1grKVpZGQr8QZWk3AW9EoxyUwuW2Dk_fg7PVKpC7tRNhgITn96aqlDPF3Ij6ogdHhTOiCYWnUjTb9j04djYQcQwOtCi9Ovm7u2B2NXkZ30TTx-vb8WgaCUoQjUjMt2vpmChNiMYiSdSQKZqmArGiYIkUQypzjjRlnCPBNJeUJExrlrOcaNoFZ7u-YaW3tfJNtrRrV4eRGeE8RojhGAXrYmdJZ713SmcrZyrh2gyjbBt6FkLPfkMP7mDnbkyp2v_F7HlyufvxA-xhh7U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2667004170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Milankovitch forcing in disconformity‐prone cyclic shallow‐water carbonates, Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), Adriatic Platform, Croatia</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Husinec, Antun ; Read, J. Fred ; Hu, Xiumian</creator><contributor>Hu, Xiumian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Husinec, Antun ; Read, J. Fred ; Hu, Xiumian ; Hu, Xiumian</creatorcontrib><description>Most Upper Jurassic studies of astronomical forcing have focused on deeper‐water sections which are relatively continuous. An Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) section on the greenhouse Adriatic Carbonate Platform, Croatia, was studied to determine if astronomical forcing can be recognized in a 5.8 ± 0.1 Myr duration, disconformity‐prone shallow platform succession. The succession consists of metre‐scale subtidal parasequences intermixed with peritidal parasequences, and intermittent subaerial breccias at sequence boundaries. Ages were constrained by biostratigraphy and δ13C chemostratigraphy, and most sequence boundaries appear to match those of the coastal onlap curve of Haq (2018). Logged sections were converted into depth–rank time series and parasequence–thickness time series. Accumulation rates were statistically evaluated for the rank series against an astronomical‐forcing model, and compared with long‐term accumulation rates (thickness divided by time). The statistical rates were used to select the ca 100 kyr eccentricity cycle to tune the series. Spectral analysis showed peaks at ca 400 kyr (superbundles) and ca 100 kyr (bundles), along with obliquity (38 kyr and 27 kyr) and precessional (18−22 kyr) cycles (parasequences). The Kimmeridgian sequences are ca 400 kyr, ca 800 kyr and ca 1.1 Myr duration. Sequence scale (0.4 to 1.2 Myr) stratigraphic completeness based on statistical accumulation rates versus long‐term rates is ca 60%. This study estimates ca 1 Myr missing time in parasequences stacked into superbundles and 1.6 Myr in four major sequence boundaries. Given that the Kimmeridgian was the hottest time of the Middle and Late Jurassic, aquifer eustasy may have influenced the timing of sequence boundaries, although documented late Kimmeridgian cooling could have triggered a glacio‐eustatic component.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-0746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-3091</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sed.12973</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madrid: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Aquifers ; Aquifer‐eustasy ; assessing missing time ; Biostratigraphy ; Boundaries ; Carbonates ; Eustatic changes ; Jurassic ; Platforms (geology) ; sequence stratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy ; Sequences ; Sequencing ; Spectral analysis ; Spectrum analysis ; Statistics ; Stratigraphy ; test of astronomical forcing ; Thickness ; Time series ; Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)</subject><ispartof>Sedimentology, 2022-06, Vol.69 (4), p.1789-1815</ispartof><rights>2022 International Association of Sedimentologists.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 International Association of Sedimentologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3203-2760037f72ef22f1a88e54e399a04dd48ca53cb60f34660a4f6c3284ff4b4b2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3203-2760037f72ef22f1a88e54e399a04dd48ca53cb60f34660a4f6c3284ff4b4b2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2489-6385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Hu, Xiumian</contributor><creatorcontrib>Husinec, Antun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, J. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiumian</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Milankovitch forcing in disconformity‐prone cyclic shallow‐water carbonates, Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), Adriatic Platform, Croatia</title><title>Sedimentology</title><description>Most Upper Jurassic studies of astronomical forcing have focused on deeper‐water sections which are relatively continuous. An Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) section on the greenhouse Adriatic Carbonate Platform, Croatia, was studied to determine if astronomical forcing can be recognized in a 5.8 ± 0.1 Myr duration, disconformity‐prone shallow platform succession. The succession consists of metre‐scale subtidal parasequences intermixed with peritidal parasequences, and intermittent subaerial breccias at sequence boundaries. Ages were constrained by biostratigraphy and δ13C chemostratigraphy, and most sequence boundaries appear to match those of the coastal onlap curve of Haq (2018). Logged sections were converted into depth–rank time series and parasequence–thickness time series. Accumulation rates were statistically evaluated for the rank series against an astronomical‐forcing model, and compared with long‐term accumulation rates (thickness divided by time). The statistical rates were used to select the ca 100 kyr eccentricity cycle to tune the series. Spectral analysis showed peaks at ca 400 kyr (superbundles) and ca 100 kyr (bundles), along with obliquity (38 kyr and 27 kyr) and precessional (18−22 kyr) cycles (parasequences). The Kimmeridgian sequences are ca 400 kyr, ca 800 kyr and ca 1.1 Myr duration. Sequence scale (0.4 to 1.2 Myr) stratigraphic completeness based on statistical accumulation rates versus long‐term rates is ca 60%. This study estimates ca 1 Myr missing time in parasequences stacked into superbundles and 1.6 Myr in four major sequence boundaries. Given that the Kimmeridgian was the hottest time of the Middle and Late Jurassic, aquifer eustasy may have influenced the timing of sequence boundaries, although documented late Kimmeridgian cooling could have triggered a glacio‐eustatic component.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Aquifer‐eustasy</subject><subject>assessing missing time</subject><subject>Biostratigraphy</subject><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Eustatic changes</subject><subject>Jurassic</subject><subject>Platforms (geology)</subject><subject>sequence stratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy</subject><subject>Sequences</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Spectral analysis</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Stratigraphy</subject><subject>test of astronomical forcing</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)</subject><issn>0037-0746</issn><issn>1365-3091</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtOwzAQhi0EEqWw4AaW2IDUtH7VSZZVKc8ikKDryHHs1iWJi51SZccRWHBCToJL2eKNrW8-z2h-AE4x6uNwBl4VfUzSmO6BDqZ8GFGU4n3QQYjGEYoZPwRH3i8RwpwlaQd8jbxX3pt6Dh9MKepX-24auYDaOrmFpoaF8dLWAVSmab8_PlfO1grKVpZGQr8QZWk3AW9EoxyUwuW2Dk_fg7PVKpC7tRNhgITn96aqlDPF3Ij6ogdHhTOiCYWnUjTb9j04djYQcQwOtCi9Ovm7u2B2NXkZ30TTx-vb8WgaCUoQjUjMt2vpmChNiMYiSdSQKZqmArGiYIkUQypzjjRlnCPBNJeUJExrlrOcaNoFZ7u-YaW3tfJNtrRrV4eRGeE8RojhGAXrYmdJZ713SmcrZyrh2gyjbBt6FkLPfkMP7mDnbkyp2v_F7HlyufvxA-xhh7U</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Husinec, Antun</creator><creator>Read, J. Fred</creator><creator>Hu, Xiumian</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-6385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Assessing Milankovitch forcing in disconformity‐prone cyclic shallow‐water carbonates, Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), Adriatic Platform, Croatia</title><author>Husinec, Antun ; Read, J. Fred ; Hu, Xiumian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3203-2760037f72ef22f1a88e54e399a04dd48ca53cb60f34660a4f6c3284ff4b4b2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Aquifer‐eustasy</topic><topic>assessing missing time</topic><topic>Biostratigraphy</topic><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Eustatic changes</topic><topic>Jurassic</topic><topic>Platforms (geology)</topic><topic>sequence stratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy</topic><topic>Sequences</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Spectral analysis</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Stratigraphy</topic><topic>test of astronomical forcing</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Husinec, Antun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, J. Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Xiumian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Husinec, Antun</au><au>Read, J. Fred</au><au>Hu, Xiumian</au><au>Hu, Xiumian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Milankovitch forcing in disconformity‐prone cyclic shallow‐water carbonates, Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), Adriatic Platform, Croatia</atitle><jtitle>Sedimentology</jtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1789</spage><epage>1815</epage><pages>1789-1815</pages><issn>0037-0746</issn><eissn>1365-3091</eissn><abstract>Most Upper Jurassic studies of astronomical forcing have focused on deeper‐water sections which are relatively continuous. An Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian) section on the greenhouse Adriatic Carbonate Platform, Croatia, was studied to determine if astronomical forcing can be recognized in a 5.8 ± 0.1 Myr duration, disconformity‐prone shallow platform succession. The succession consists of metre‐scale subtidal parasequences intermixed with peritidal parasequences, and intermittent subaerial breccias at sequence boundaries. Ages were constrained by biostratigraphy and δ13C chemostratigraphy, and most sequence boundaries appear to match those of the coastal onlap curve of Haq (2018). Logged sections were converted into depth–rank time series and parasequence–thickness time series. Accumulation rates were statistically evaluated for the rank series against an astronomical‐forcing model, and compared with long‐term accumulation rates (thickness divided by time). The statistical rates were used to select the ca 100 kyr eccentricity cycle to tune the series. Spectral analysis showed peaks at ca 400 kyr (superbundles) and ca 100 kyr (bundles), along with obliquity (38 kyr and 27 kyr) and precessional (18−22 kyr) cycles (parasequences). The Kimmeridgian sequences are ca 400 kyr, ca 800 kyr and ca 1.1 Myr duration. Sequence scale (0.4 to 1.2 Myr) stratigraphic completeness based on statistical accumulation rates versus long‐term rates is ca 60%. This study estimates ca 1 Myr missing time in parasequences stacked into superbundles and 1.6 Myr in four major sequence boundaries. Given that the Kimmeridgian was the hottest time of the Middle and Late Jurassic, aquifer eustasy may have influenced the timing of sequence boundaries, although documented late Kimmeridgian cooling could have triggered a glacio‐eustatic component.</abstract><cop>Madrid</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/sed.12973</doi><tpages>1815</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-6385</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-0746
ispartof Sedimentology, 2022-06, Vol.69 (4), p.1789-1815
issn 0037-0746
1365-3091
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2667004170
source Wiley
subjects Accumulation
Aquifers
Aquifer‐eustasy
assessing missing time
Biostratigraphy
Boundaries
Carbonates
Eustatic changes
Jurassic
Platforms (geology)
sequence stratigraphy and cyclostratigraphy
Sequences
Sequencing
Spectral analysis
Spectrum analysis
Statistics
Stratigraphy
test of astronomical forcing
Thickness
Time series
Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian)
title Assessing Milankovitch forcing in disconformity‐prone cyclic shallow‐water carbonates, Upper Jurassic (Kimmeridgian), Adriatic Platform, Croatia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T02%3A47%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Milankovitch%20forcing%20in%20disconformity%E2%80%90prone%20cyclic%20shallow%E2%80%90water%20carbonates,%20Upper%20Jurassic%20(Kimmeridgian),%20Adriatic%20Platform,%20Croatia&rft.jtitle=Sedimentology&rft.au=Husinec,%20Antun&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1789&rft.epage=1815&rft.pages=1789-1815&rft.issn=0037-0746&rft.eissn=1365-3091&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sed.12973&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2667004170%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3203-2760037f72ef22f1a88e54e399a04dd48ca53cb60f34660a4f6c3284ff4b4b2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2667004170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true