Loading…

The Improved Amati Correlations from Gaussian Copula

In this paper, we present two improved Amati correlations of gamma-ray burst (GRB) data via a powerful statistical tool called copula. After calibrating with the low-redshift GRB data, the improved Amati correlations based on a fiducial Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model with Ω m0 = 0.3 and H 0 = 70 km...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Astrophysical journal 2022-05, Vol.931 (1), p.50
Main Authors: Liu, Yang, Chen, Fuyong, Liang, Nan, Yuan, Zunli, Yu, Hongwei, Wu, Puxun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper, we present two improved Amati correlations of gamma-ray burst (GRB) data via a powerful statistical tool called copula. After calibrating with the low-redshift GRB data, the improved Amati correlations based on a fiducial Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model with Ω m0 = 0.3 and H 0 = 70 km s −1 Mpc −1 , and extrapolating the results to the high-redshift GRB data, we obtain the Hubble diagram of GRB data points. Applying these GRB data to constrain the ΛCDM model, we find that the improved Amati correlation from copula can give a result well consistent with Ω m0 = 0.3, while the standard Amati and extended Amati correlations do not. This results suggest that when the improved Amati correlation from copula is used in the low-redshift calibration method, the GRB data can be regarded as a viable cosmological explorer. However, the Bayesian information criterion indicates that the standard Amati correlation remains to be favored mildly since it has the least model parameters. Furthermore, once the simultaneous fitting method rather than the low-redshift calibration one is used, there is no apparent evidence that the improved Amati correlation is better than the standard one. Thus, more work needs to be done in the future in order to compare different Amati correlations.
ISSN:0004-637X
1538-4357
DOI:10.3847/1538-4357/ac66d3