Loading…
Risk Network Evaluation of Prefabricated Building Projects in Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Study in Qinghai
Prefabricated building projects (PBPs) face more risks than traditional construction projects, especially in underdeveloped areas. This study takes Qinghai Province as a study case. Social network analysis (SNA) is adopted to develop a risk network of PBPs, and nine core risk factors and five key ri...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sustainability 2022-05, Vol.14 (10), p.6335 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-deca32244574fefa0a4591433932ed252fd74b58df3e6dc1e08a7c8633a6eb283 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-deca32244574fefa0a4591433932ed252fd74b58df3e6dc1e08a7c8633a6eb283 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 6335 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Wang, Qiuyu Gong, Zhiqi Liu, Chengkui |
description | Prefabricated building projects (PBPs) face more risks than traditional construction projects, especially in underdeveloped areas. This study takes Qinghai Province as a study case. Social network analysis (SNA) is adopted to develop a risk network of PBPs, and nine core risk factors and five key risk relationships are identified. Risk effect detection reveals the effectiveness of risk response strategies. The research shows that PBPs in underdeveloped areas are still in the early stage of development, and developers generally lack a leading role. There are prominent problems in the design stage of PBPs, so the stakeholders pay special attention to them. In underdeveloped regions, the development of PBPs must rely on the strong promotion of the government. Limited by natural and economic conditions, the market mechanism of PBPs in underdeveloped areas is not perfect, and policy regulation greatly affects the spread of the risk network. Therefore, local governments need to actively introduce corresponding supportive policies and mobilize the enthusiasm of stakeholders. This is the first study to consider the risk within the life cycle of PBPs in underdeveloped plateau areas. This study expands the research system of risk management of PBPs and provides valuable risk response strategies for the stakeholders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su14106335 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2670451358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2670451358</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-deca32244574fefa0a4591433932ed252fd74b58df3e6dc1e08a7c8633a6eb283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWGpvfIKAd8JqjnvwrpZ6gOK510uazGradVOTbKVvb0oFnZsZhm8O_4_QKSUXnFfkMvRUUJJzLg_QgJGCZpRIcvivPkajEJYkBee0ovkArV5sWOEHiN_Or_B0o9peRes67Br85KFRC2-1imDwdW9bY7v31HZL0DFg2-F5Z8Ab2EDr1okZe1DhCo_xRAXAr7E32x31nMY-lD1BR41qA4x-8xDNb6Zvk7ts9nh7PxnPMs0qGTMDWnHGhJCFaNIHRAlZUZEkcgaGSdaYQixkaRoOudEUSKkKXSbdKocFK_kQne33rr376iHEeul636WTNcsLIiTlcked7yntXQhJar329lP5bU1JvfOz_vOT_wBKJWee</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670451358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk Network Evaluation of Prefabricated Building Projects in Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Study in Qinghai</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Wang, Qiuyu ; Gong, Zhiqi ; Liu, Chengkui</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiuyu ; Gong, Zhiqi ; Liu, Chengkui</creatorcontrib><description>Prefabricated building projects (PBPs) face more risks than traditional construction projects, especially in underdeveloped areas. This study takes Qinghai Province as a study case. Social network analysis (SNA) is adopted to develop a risk network of PBPs, and nine core risk factors and five key risk relationships are identified. Risk effect detection reveals the effectiveness of risk response strategies. The research shows that PBPs in underdeveloped areas are still in the early stage of development, and developers generally lack a leading role. There are prominent problems in the design stage of PBPs, so the stakeholders pay special attention to them. In underdeveloped regions, the development of PBPs must rely on the strong promotion of the government. Limited by natural and economic conditions, the market mechanism of PBPs in underdeveloped areas is not perfect, and policy regulation greatly affects the spread of the risk network. Therefore, local governments need to actively introduce corresponding supportive policies and mobilize the enthusiasm of stakeholders. This is the first study to consider the risk within the life cycle of PBPs in underdeveloped plateau areas. This study expands the research system of risk management of PBPs and provides valuable risk response strategies for the stakeholders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su14106335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Building construction ; Case studies ; Construction ; Construction costs ; Construction industry ; Economic conditions ; Industrial development ; Investments ; Local government ; Network analysis ; Prefabricated buildings ; Project engineering ; Project management ; Regions ; Risk analysis ; Risk factors ; Risk management ; Social networks ; Social organization ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2022-05, Vol.14 (10), p.6335</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-deca32244574fefa0a4591433932ed252fd74b58df3e6dc1e08a7c8633a6eb283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-deca32244574fefa0a4591433932ed252fd74b58df3e6dc1e08a7c8633a6eb283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670451358/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2670451358?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Zhiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chengkui</creatorcontrib><title>Risk Network Evaluation of Prefabricated Building Projects in Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Study in Qinghai</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Prefabricated building projects (PBPs) face more risks than traditional construction projects, especially in underdeveloped areas. This study takes Qinghai Province as a study case. Social network analysis (SNA) is adopted to develop a risk network of PBPs, and nine core risk factors and five key risk relationships are identified. Risk effect detection reveals the effectiveness of risk response strategies. The research shows that PBPs in underdeveloped areas are still in the early stage of development, and developers generally lack a leading role. There are prominent problems in the design stage of PBPs, so the stakeholders pay special attention to them. In underdeveloped regions, the development of PBPs must rely on the strong promotion of the government. Limited by natural and economic conditions, the market mechanism of PBPs in underdeveloped areas is not perfect, and policy regulation greatly affects the spread of the risk network. Therefore, local governments need to actively introduce corresponding supportive policies and mobilize the enthusiasm of stakeholders. This is the first study to consider the risk within the life cycle of PBPs in underdeveloped plateau areas. This study expands the research system of risk management of PBPs and provides valuable risk response strategies for the stakeholders.</description><subject>Building construction</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Industrial development</subject><subject>Investments</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Prefabricated buildings</subject><subject>Project engineering</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social organization</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkNtKAzEQhoMoWGpvfIKAd8JqjnvwrpZ6gOK510uazGradVOTbKVvb0oFnZsZhm8O_4_QKSUXnFfkMvRUUJJzLg_QgJGCZpRIcvivPkajEJYkBee0ovkArV5sWOEHiN_Or_B0o9peRes67Br85KFRC2-1imDwdW9bY7v31HZL0DFg2-F5Z8Ab2EDr1okZe1DhCo_xRAXAr7E32x31nMY-lD1BR41qA4x-8xDNb6Zvk7ts9nh7PxnPMs0qGTMDWnHGhJCFaNIHRAlZUZEkcgaGSdaYQixkaRoOudEUSKkKXSbdKocFK_kQne33rr376iHEeul636WTNcsLIiTlcked7yntXQhJar329lP5bU1JvfOz_vOT_wBKJWee</recordid><startdate>20220501</startdate><enddate>20220501</enddate><creator>Wang, Qiuyu</creator><creator>Gong, Zhiqi</creator><creator>Liu, Chengkui</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220501</creationdate><title>Risk Network Evaluation of Prefabricated Building Projects in Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Study in Qinghai</title><author>Wang, Qiuyu ; Gong, Zhiqi ; Liu, Chengkui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-deca32244574fefa0a4591433932ed252fd74b58df3e6dc1e08a7c8633a6eb283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Building construction</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Industrial development</topic><topic>Investments</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Prefabricated buildings</topic><topic>Project engineering</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social organization</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiuyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gong, Zhiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Chengkui</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Qiuyu</au><au>Gong, Zhiqi</au><au>Liu, Chengkui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk Network Evaluation of Prefabricated Building Projects in Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Study in Qinghai</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2022-05-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>6335</spage><pages>6335-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Prefabricated building projects (PBPs) face more risks than traditional construction projects, especially in underdeveloped areas. This study takes Qinghai Province as a study case. Social network analysis (SNA) is adopted to develop a risk network of PBPs, and nine core risk factors and five key risk relationships are identified. Risk effect detection reveals the effectiveness of risk response strategies. The research shows that PBPs in underdeveloped areas are still in the early stage of development, and developers generally lack a leading role. There are prominent problems in the design stage of PBPs, so the stakeholders pay special attention to them. In underdeveloped regions, the development of PBPs must rely on the strong promotion of the government. Limited by natural and economic conditions, the market mechanism of PBPs in underdeveloped areas is not perfect, and policy regulation greatly affects the spread of the risk network. Therefore, local governments need to actively introduce corresponding supportive policies and mobilize the enthusiasm of stakeholders. This is the first study to consider the risk within the life cycle of PBPs in underdeveloped plateau areas. This study expands the research system of risk management of PBPs and provides valuable risk response strategies for the stakeholders.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su14106335</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2022-05, Vol.14 (10), p.6335 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2670451358 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Building construction Case studies Construction Construction costs Construction industry Economic conditions Industrial development Investments Local government Network analysis Prefabricated buildings Project engineering Project management Regions Risk analysis Risk factors Risk management Social networks Social organization Sustainability |
title | Risk Network Evaluation of Prefabricated Building Projects in Underdeveloped Areas: A Case Study in Qinghai |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T23%3A44%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20Network%20Evaluation%20of%20Prefabricated%20Building%20Projects%20in%20Underdeveloped%20Areas:%20A%20Case%20Study%20in%20Qinghai&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Wang,%20Qiuyu&rft.date=2022-05-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=6335&rft.pages=6335-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su14106335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2670451358%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-deca32244574fefa0a4591433932ed252fd74b58df3e6dc1e08a7c8633a6eb283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670451358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |