Loading…

Training female adolescent students with intellectual disabilities about genital hygiene skills using peer training

The study aimed to evaluate the effects of peer training of female adolescent students diagnosed with intellectual disabilities and started menses, about genital hygiene and menstrual care skills on a baby doll. This study was planned as a non-control group research design including pre-test, post-t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of developmental disabilities 2022, Vol.68 (3), p.332-341
Main Authors: Kırbaş, Zila Özlem, Kaşko Arıcı, Yeliz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study aimed to evaluate the effects of peer training of female adolescent students diagnosed with intellectual disabilities and started menses, about genital hygiene and menstrual care skills on a baby doll. This study was planned as a non-control group research design including pre-test, post-test and follow-up stages. It was conducted in special educational institutions. The population consisted of 68 female students between 10-18 years old. Calculation of sample size was not performed, and 65 students were included in the study. The data were collected using Socio-Demographic Form, Genital Cleansing Skill Form (GCSF), Pad Replacement Skill Analysis Form (PRSAF), and Teacher/Parent Opinion and Feedback Form. The statistical analysis of the study data was performed using Mc-Nemar test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Friedman test followed by Dunn-Bonferroni post-hoc test. In all follow-up periods, GCSF and PRSAF scores compared by Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests did not change based upon demographic characteristics (p > 0.05). Friedman test showed that GCSF and PRSAF scores showed significant differences between the follow-up periods (p  0.05). However, 2nd and 3rd follow-up scores were found to be significantly higher than 1st follow-up score (p 
ISSN:2047-3869
2047-3877
DOI:10.1080/20473869.2020.1774224