Loading…
Early‐Onset Micromorphological Changes of Neuronal Fiber Bundles During Radiotherapy
Background Patients receiving cranial radiation face the risk of delayed brain dysfunction. However, an early medical imaging marker is not available until irreversible morphological changes emerge. Purpose To explore the micromorphological white matter changes during the radiotherapy session by uti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2022-07, Vol.56 (1), p.210-218 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Patients receiving cranial radiation face the risk of delayed brain dysfunction. However, an early medical imaging marker is not available until irreversible morphological changes emerge.
Purpose
To explore the micromorphological white matter changes during the radiotherapy session by utilizing an along‐tract analysis framework.
Study Type
Prospective.
Population
Eighteen nasopharyngeal carcinoma (two female) patients receiving cranial radiation.
Field Strength/Sequence
3.0 T; Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and T1‐ and T2‐weighted images (T1W, T2W); computed tomography (CT).
Assessment
Patients received three DTI imaging scans during the radiotherapy (RT), namely the baseline scan (1–2 days before RT began), the middle scan (the middle of the RT session), and the end scan (1–2 days after RT ended). Twelve fibers were segmented after whole‐brain tractography. Then, the fractional anisotropy (FA) values and the cumulative radiation dose received for each fiber streamline were resampled and projected into their center fiber.
Statistical Tests
The contrast among the three scans (P1: middle scan–baseline scan; P2: end scan–middle scan; P3: end scan–baseline scan) were compared using the linear mixed model for each of the 12 center fibers. Then, a dose–responsiveness relationship was performed using Pearson correlation. P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmri.28018 |