On the Implementation of Postprocessing of Runoff Forecast Ensembles

Different postprocessing techniques are frequently employed to improve the outcome of ensemble forecasting models. The main reason is to compensate for biases caused by errors in model structure or initial conditions, and as a correction for under- or overdispersed ensembles. Here we use the ensembl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of hydrometeorology 2021-10, Vol.22 (10), p.2731-2749
Main Authors: Skøien, Jon Olav, Bogner, Konrad, Salamon, Peter, Wetterhall, Fredrik
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Calibration
Economic forecasting
Ensemble forecasting
Errors
Forecast errors
Hydrologic models
Hydrology
Initial conditions
Interpolation
Lead time
Mathematical models
Methods
Modelling
Runoff
Runoff forecasting
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Stream flow
Variables
Weather forecasting
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Different postprocessing techniques are frequently employed to improve the outcome of ensemble forecasting models. The main reason is to compensate for biases caused by errors in model structure or initial conditions, and as a correction for under- or overdispersed ensembles. Here we use the ensemble model output statistics method to postprocess the ensemble output from a continental-scale hydrological model, LISFLOOD, as used in the European Flood Awareness System (EFAS). We develop a method for local calibration and interpolation of the postprocessing parameters and compare it with a more traditional global calibration approach for 678 stations in Europe based on longterm observations of runoff and meteorological variables. For the global calibration we also test a reduced model with only a variance inflation factor. Whereas the postprocessing improved the results for the first 1–2 days lead time, the improvement was less for increasing lead times of the verification period. This was the case both for the local and global calibration methods. As the postprocessing is based on assumptions about the distribution of forecast errors, we also present an analysis of the ensemble output that provides some indications of what to expect from the postprocessing.
ISSN:1525-755X
1525-7541
DOI:10.1175/JHM-D-21-0008.1