Loading…

Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability

The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational measurement, issues and practice issues and practice, 2022-06, Vol.41 (2), p.36-54
Main Authors: Xiao, Yue, Veldkamp, Bernard, Liu, Hongyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343
container_end_page 54
container_issue 2
container_start_page 36
container_title Educational measurement, issues and practice
container_volume 41
creator Xiao, Yue
Veldkamp, Bernard
Liu, Hongyun
description The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/emip.12474
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2676577222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1338779</ericid><sourcerecordid>2676577222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYv3oWANyF1Nptku8dSqkZaLP65uiSbiWxJsnE3VXrzEXxGn8TEiEfnMjDfb75hPkJOKUxoV5dY6WZCg5CHe2REeRj5TIhgn4yAM-r3g0Ny5NwGgEax4CPyPDdVpmtdv3hraxQ65yV1YWyVttrUXlrnXtJi5d2ja0zt0FuZHMseb423cK3uQOxXsxKrr4_PB1O-9eos06Vud8fkoEhLhye_fUyerhaP8xt_eXedzGdLX7FIhD5LAYQCHkIUU1bEUGQ0Y0yBCBnEKstzDjlCEWOehizIMM6mABEipEpQFrIxOR98G2tet-hauTFbW3cnZRDzOOI8CIKOuhgoZY1zFgvZ2O4Bu5MUZJ-f7POTP_l18NkAo9XqD1zcUsamnItOp4P-rkvc_eMkF6tkPXh-A1ezfUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2676577222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Xiao, Yue ; Veldkamp, Bernard ; Liu, Hongyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yue ; Veldkamp, Bernard ; Liu, Hongyun</creatorcontrib><description>The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emip.12474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Wiley</publisher><subject>ability estimation ; Adults ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian framework ; Correlation ; Data Analysis ; Data processing ; Educational tests &amp; measurements ; International Assessment ; Item Analysis ; Item Response Theory ; Measurement ; Problem Solving ; process data analysis ; Scores</subject><ispartof>Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2022-06, Vol.41 (2), p.36-54</ispartof><rights>2021 by the National Council on Measurement in Education.</rights><rights>2022 by the National Council on Measurement in Education.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3472-9102 ; 0000-0002-2836-2906 ; 0000-0003-3543-2164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1338779$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hongyun</creatorcontrib><title>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</title><title>Educational measurement, issues and practice</title><description>The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation.</description><subject>ability estimation</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian framework</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Educational tests &amp; measurements</subject><subject>International Assessment</subject><subject>Item Analysis</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>process data analysis</subject><subject>Scores</subject><issn>0731-1745</issn><issn>1745-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYv3oWANyF1Nptku8dSqkZaLP65uiSbiWxJsnE3VXrzEXxGn8TEiEfnMjDfb75hPkJOKUxoV5dY6WZCg5CHe2REeRj5TIhgn4yAM-r3g0Ny5NwGgEax4CPyPDdVpmtdv3hraxQ65yV1YWyVttrUXlrnXtJi5d2ja0zt0FuZHMseb423cK3uQOxXsxKrr4_PB1O-9eos06Vud8fkoEhLhye_fUyerhaP8xt_eXedzGdLX7FIhD5LAYQCHkIUU1bEUGQ0Y0yBCBnEKstzDjlCEWOehizIMM6mABEipEpQFrIxOR98G2tet-hauTFbW3cnZRDzOOI8CIKOuhgoZY1zFgvZ2O4Bu5MUZJ-f7POTP_l18NkAo9XqD1zcUsamnItOp4P-rkvc_eMkF6tkPXh-A1ezfUQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Xiao, Yue</creator><creator>Veldkamp, Bernard</creator><creator>Liu, Hongyun</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-9102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-2906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-2164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</title><author>Xiao, Yue ; Veldkamp, Bernard ; Liu, Hongyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>ability estimation</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian framework</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Educational tests &amp; measurements</topic><topic>International Assessment</topic><topic>Item Analysis</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>process data analysis</topic><topic>Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hongyun</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Yue</au><au>Veldkamp, Bernard</au><au>Liu, Hongyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1338779</ericid><atitle>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</atitle><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>36-54</pages><issn>0731-1745</issn><eissn>1745-3992</eissn><abstract>The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/emip.12474</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-9102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-2906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-2164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0731-1745
ispartof Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2022-06, Vol.41 (2), p.36-54
issn 0731-1745
1745-3992
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2676577222
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC
subjects ability estimation
Adults
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian framework
Correlation
Data Analysis
Data processing
Educational tests & measurements
International Assessment
Item Analysis
Item Response Theory
Measurement
Problem Solving
process data analysis
Scores
title Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T01%3A54%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20Process%20Information%20and%20Item%20Response%20Modeling%20to%20Estimate%20Problem%E2%80%90Solving%20Ability&rft.jtitle=Educational%20measurement,%20issues%20and%20practice&rft.au=Xiao,%20Yue&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=36-54&rft.issn=0731-1745&rft.eissn=1745-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emip.12474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2676577222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2676577222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1338779&rfr_iscdi=true