Loading…
Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability
The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item...
Saved in:
Published in: | Educational measurement, issues and practice issues and practice, 2022-06, Vol.41 (2), p.36-54 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343 |
container_end_page | 54 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Educational measurement, issues and practice |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Xiao, Yue Veldkamp, Bernard Liu, Hongyun |
description | The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/emip.12474 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2676577222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1338779</ericid><sourcerecordid>2676577222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYv3oWANyF1Nptku8dSqkZaLP65uiSbiWxJsnE3VXrzEXxGn8TEiEfnMjDfb75hPkJOKUxoV5dY6WZCg5CHe2REeRj5TIhgn4yAM-r3g0Ny5NwGgEax4CPyPDdVpmtdv3hraxQ65yV1YWyVttrUXlrnXtJi5d2ja0zt0FuZHMseb423cK3uQOxXsxKrr4_PB1O-9eos06Vud8fkoEhLhye_fUyerhaP8xt_eXedzGdLX7FIhD5LAYQCHkIUU1bEUGQ0Y0yBCBnEKstzDjlCEWOehizIMM6mABEipEpQFrIxOR98G2tet-hauTFbW3cnZRDzOOI8CIKOuhgoZY1zFgvZ2O4Bu5MUZJ-f7POTP_l18NkAo9XqD1zcUsamnItOp4P-rkvc_eMkF6tkPXh-A1ezfUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2676577222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Xiao, Yue ; Veldkamp, Bernard ; Liu, Hongyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yue ; Veldkamp, Bernard ; Liu, Hongyun</creatorcontrib><description>The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-1745</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/emip.12474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Wiley</publisher><subject>ability estimation ; Adults ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian framework ; Correlation ; Data Analysis ; Data processing ; Educational tests & measurements ; International Assessment ; Item Analysis ; Item Response Theory ; Measurement ; Problem Solving ; process data analysis ; Scores</subject><ispartof>Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2022-06, Vol.41 (2), p.36-54</ispartof><rights>2021 by the National Council on Measurement in Education.</rights><rights>2022 by the National Council on Measurement in Education.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3472-9102 ; 0000-0002-2836-2906 ; 0000-0003-3543-2164</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1338779$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hongyun</creatorcontrib><title>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</title><title>Educational measurement, issues and practice</title><description>The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation.</description><subject>ability estimation</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian framework</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Educational tests & measurements</subject><subject>International Assessment</subject><subject>Item Analysis</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>process data analysis</subject><subject>Scores</subject><issn>0731-1745</issn><issn>1745-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFYv3oWANyF1Nptku8dSqkZaLP65uiSbiWxJsnE3VXrzEXxGn8TEiEfnMjDfb75hPkJOKUxoV5dY6WZCg5CHe2REeRj5TIhgn4yAM-r3g0Ny5NwGgEax4CPyPDdVpmtdv3hraxQ65yV1YWyVttrUXlrnXtJi5d2ja0zt0FuZHMseb423cK3uQOxXsxKrr4_PB1O-9eos06Vud8fkoEhLhye_fUyerhaP8xt_eXedzGdLX7FIhD5LAYQCHkIUU1bEUGQ0Y0yBCBnEKstzDjlCEWOehizIMM6mABEipEpQFrIxOR98G2tet-hauTFbW3cnZRDzOOI8CIKOuhgoZY1zFgvZ2O4Bu5MUZJ-f7POTP_l18NkAo9XqD1zcUsamnItOp4P-rkvc_eMkF6tkPXh-A1ezfUQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Xiao, Yue</creator><creator>Veldkamp, Bernard</creator><creator>Liu, Hongyun</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-9102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-2906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-2164</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</title><author>Xiao, Yue ; Veldkamp, Bernard ; Liu, Hongyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>ability estimation</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian framework</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Educational tests & measurements</topic><topic>International Assessment</topic><topic>Item Analysis</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>process data analysis</topic><topic>Scores</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Veldkamp, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hongyun</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Yue</au><au>Veldkamp, Bernard</au><au>Liu, Hongyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1338779</ericid><atitle>Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability</atitle><jtitle>Educational measurement, issues and practice</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>36-54</pages><issn>0731-1745</issn><eissn>1745-3992</eissn><abstract>The action sequences of respondents in problem‐solving tasks reflect rich and detailed information about their performance, including differences in problem‐solving ability, even if item scores are equal. It is therefore not sufficient to infer individual problem‐solving skills based solely on item scores. This study is a preliminary attempt to incorporate process data analysis into the measurement of problem‐solving ability. The entire procedure consists of using information from process data as prior information for the estimation of problem‐solving proficiency in an item response model. The purpose of this study is twofold: (1) to investigate the impact of adding process information on the estimation of latent ability; (2) to examine the extent to which the ability estimates obtained from the combination model can reflect the information of the problem‐solving process. Seven problem‐solving items from the Programme for International Assessment of Adult Competencies were used. Results indicate that the inclusion of process priors enhances the correlation between proficiency estimates and process information related to the problem‐solving strategies adopted by respondents, as well as to their solution efficiency. The inclusion of process priors further reveals differences in the problem‐solving performance of respondents exhibiting the same score pattern and increases precision of latent ability estimation.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1111/emip.12474</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-9102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-2906</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3543-2164</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0731-1745 |
ispartof | Educational measurement, issues and practice, 2022-06, Vol.41 (2), p.36-54 |
issn | 0731-1745 1745-3992 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2676577222 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; ERIC |
subjects | ability estimation Adults Bayesian analysis Bayesian framework Correlation Data Analysis Data processing Educational tests & measurements International Assessment Item Analysis Item Response Theory Measurement Problem Solving process data analysis Scores |
title | Combining Process Information and Item Response Modeling to Estimate Problem‐Solving Ability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T01%3A54%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combining%20Process%20Information%20and%20Item%20Response%20Modeling%20to%20Estimate%20Problem%E2%80%90Solving%20Ability&rft.jtitle=Educational%20measurement,%20issues%20and%20practice&rft.au=Xiao,%20Yue&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=36-54&rft.issn=0731-1745&rft.eissn=1745-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/emip.12474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2676577222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3594-3a009c07405613f60fb1b33c094306cbdd70de0f6eda432be6b8005ee0ac91343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2676577222&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1338779&rfr_iscdi=true |