Loading…

Bear diets and human–bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology

Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca and polar bears Ursus maritimus. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from δ15N (‰) values a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mammal review 2022-07, Vol.52 (3), p.322-327
Main Authors: Falconi, Nereyda, Carlo, Tomás A., Fuller, Todd K., Destefano, Stephen, Organ, John F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-67dae07f7e01dabc2415fc65d40cc4b92bd48a7134f68dbaa5d7cff3f7db41823
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-67dae07f7e01dabc2415fc65d40cc4b92bd48a7134f68dbaa5d7cff3f7db41823
container_end_page 327
container_issue 3
container_start_page 322
container_title Mammal review
container_volume 52
creator Falconi, Nereyda
Carlo, Tomás A.
Fuller, Todd K.
Destefano, Stephen
Organ, John F.
description Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca and polar bears Ursus maritimus. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from δ15N (‰) values and examined their correlation with diets reported in the literature, including frequency of human–bear conflicts (livestock predation and crop damage incidents). Overall, 15N signatures were consistent with diet estimates. Bear species with higher 15N signatures differed more from each other, including cases of large regional intraspecific variance, than bear species with lower 15N signatures. Bear trophic position and frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts were uncorrelated, suggesting that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. We inferred bear trophic positions from stable isotope values from hair samples of the eight species of bear in six localities. Bear species with higher 15N signatures, such as polar bears Ursus maritimus, differed more from each other than bear species with lower 15N signatures, such as giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca, Asian black bears Ursus thibetanus, Andean bears Tremarctos ornatus, and American black bears Ursus americanus. The brown bear Ursus arctos was the species with highest intraspecific variance of 15N signatures. We examined diets reported in the literature and the frequency of human–bear conflicts, and correlated both variables with 15N signatures. 15N signature was correlated with diet, but not with frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts or bear trophic position. We suggest that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. Bear artwork by Roger Hall.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/mam.12285
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2676968655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2676968655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-67dae07f7e01dabc2415fc65d40cc4b92bd48a7134f68dbaa5d7cff3f7db41823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtOwzAQBmALgUQpLLhBJFYs0tqOX2FXqvKQWrGBteX40bpK4mKnQt1xB27ISUgJW2Yz0uibGekH4BrBCepr2qhmgjAW9ASMUMFojkvIT8EIFpDmSBTiHFyktIUQYk7wCCzurYqZ8bZLmWpNttk3qv3-_KqOYx1aV3vdpbvMt8mvNz1yMTSZT6ELO68zq0Md1odLcOZUnezVXx-Dt4fF6_wpX748Ps9ny1zjktOccaMs5I5biIyqNCaIOs2oIVBrUpW4MkQojgrimDCVUtRw7VzhuKkIErgYg5vh7i6G971NndyGfWz7lxIzzkomGKW9uh2UjiGlaJ3cRd-oeJAIymNKsk9J_qbU2-lgP3xtD_9DuZqtho0ffoJqRQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2676968655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bear diets and human–bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Falconi, Nereyda ; Carlo, Tomás A. ; Fuller, Todd K. ; Destefano, Stephen ; Organ, John F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Falconi, Nereyda ; Carlo, Tomás A. ; Fuller, Todd K. ; Destefano, Stephen ; Organ, John F.</creatorcontrib><description>Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca and polar bears Ursus maritimus. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from δ15N (‰) values and examined their correlation with diets reported in the literature, including frequency of human–bear conflicts (livestock predation and crop damage incidents). Overall, 15N signatures were consistent with diet estimates. Bear species with higher 15N signatures differed more from each other, including cases of large regional intraspecific variance, than bear species with lower 15N signatures. Bear trophic position and frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts were uncorrelated, suggesting that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. We inferred bear trophic positions from stable isotope values from hair samples of the eight species of bear in six localities. Bear species with higher 15N signatures, such as polar bears Ursus maritimus, differed more from each other than bear species with lower 15N signatures, such as giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca, Asian black bears Ursus thibetanus, Andean bears Tremarctos ornatus, and American black bears Ursus americanus. The brown bear Ursus arctos was the species with highest intraspecific variance of 15N signatures. We examined diets reported in the literature and the frequency of human–bear conflicts, and correlated both variables with 15N signatures. 15N signature was correlated with diet, but not with frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts or bear trophic position. We suggest that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. Bear artwork by Roger Hall.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-1838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2907</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/mam.12285</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ailuropoda melanoleuca ; bears ; carnivory ; Crop damage ; Diet ; Ecology ; Food availability ; Livestock ; Nitrogen‐15 ; Omnivores ; omnivory ; Polar bears ; Predation ; Signatures ; stable isotopes ; trophic position ; Ursidae ; Ursus maritimus</subject><ispartof>Mammal review, 2022-07, Vol.52 (3), p.322-327</ispartof><rights>2022 The Mammal Society and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Mammal Society and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-67dae07f7e01dabc2415fc65d40cc4b92bd48a7134f68dbaa5d7cff3f7db41823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-67dae07f7e01dabc2415fc65d40cc4b92bd48a7134f68dbaa5d7cff3f7db41823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5084-5659</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Falconi, Nereyda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlo, Tomás A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Todd K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Destefano, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Organ, John F.</creatorcontrib><title>Bear diets and human–bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology</title><title>Mammal review</title><description>Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca and polar bears Ursus maritimus. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from δ15N (‰) values and examined their correlation with diets reported in the literature, including frequency of human–bear conflicts (livestock predation and crop damage incidents). Overall, 15N signatures were consistent with diet estimates. Bear species with higher 15N signatures differed more from each other, including cases of large regional intraspecific variance, than bear species with lower 15N signatures. Bear trophic position and frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts were uncorrelated, suggesting that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. We inferred bear trophic positions from stable isotope values from hair samples of the eight species of bear in six localities. Bear species with higher 15N signatures, such as polar bears Ursus maritimus, differed more from each other than bear species with lower 15N signatures, such as giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca, Asian black bears Ursus thibetanus, Andean bears Tremarctos ornatus, and American black bears Ursus americanus. The brown bear Ursus arctos was the species with highest intraspecific variance of 15N signatures. We examined diets reported in the literature and the frequency of human–bear conflicts, and correlated both variables with 15N signatures. 15N signature was correlated with diet, but not with frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts or bear trophic position. We suggest that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. Bear artwork by Roger Hall.</description><subject>Ailuropoda melanoleuca</subject><subject>bears</subject><subject>carnivory</subject><subject>Crop damage</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Nitrogen‐15</subject><subject>Omnivores</subject><subject>omnivory</subject><subject>Polar bears</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Signatures</subject><subject>stable isotopes</subject><subject>trophic position</subject><subject>Ursidae</subject><subject>Ursus maritimus</subject><issn>0305-1838</issn><issn>1365-2907</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtOwzAQBmALgUQpLLhBJFYs0tqOX2FXqvKQWrGBteX40bpK4mKnQt1xB27ISUgJW2Yz0uibGekH4BrBCepr2qhmgjAW9ASMUMFojkvIT8EIFpDmSBTiHFyktIUQYk7wCCzurYqZ8bZLmWpNttk3qv3-_KqOYx1aV3vdpbvMt8mvNz1yMTSZT6ELO68zq0Md1odLcOZUnezVXx-Dt4fF6_wpX748Ps9ny1zjktOccaMs5I5biIyqNCaIOs2oIVBrUpW4MkQojgrimDCVUtRw7VzhuKkIErgYg5vh7i6G971NndyGfWz7lxIzzkomGKW9uh2UjiGlaJ3cRd-oeJAIymNKsk9J_qbU2-lgP3xtD_9DuZqtho0ffoJqRQ</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Falconi, Nereyda</creator><creator>Carlo, Tomás A.</creator><creator>Fuller, Todd K.</creator><creator>Destefano, Stephen</creator><creator>Organ, John F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-5659</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Bear diets and human–bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology</title><author>Falconi, Nereyda ; Carlo, Tomás A. ; Fuller, Todd K. ; Destefano, Stephen ; Organ, John F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-67dae07f7e01dabc2415fc65d40cc4b92bd48a7134f68dbaa5d7cff3f7db41823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Ailuropoda melanoleuca</topic><topic>bears</topic><topic>carnivory</topic><topic>Crop damage</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Nitrogen‐15</topic><topic>Omnivores</topic><topic>omnivory</topic><topic>Polar bears</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Signatures</topic><topic>stable isotopes</topic><topic>trophic position</topic><topic>Ursidae</topic><topic>Ursus maritimus</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Falconi, Nereyda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carlo, Tomás A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuller, Todd K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Destefano, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Organ, John F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Falconi, Nereyda</au><au>Carlo, Tomás A.</au><au>Fuller, Todd K.</au><au>Destefano, Stephen</au><au>Organ, John F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bear diets and human–bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology</atitle><jtitle>Mammal review</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>327</epage><pages>322-327</pages><issn>0305-1838</issn><eissn>1365-2907</eissn><abstract>Bears, Ursidae, are considered omnivores, except for giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca and polar bears Ursus maritimus. However, omnivory includes a wide range of dietary variation and trophic positions, making bear dietary ecology unclear. We inferred bear trophic positions from δ15N (‰) values and examined their correlation with diets reported in the literature, including frequency of human–bear conflicts (livestock predation and crop damage incidents). Overall, 15N signatures were consistent with diet estimates. Bear species with higher 15N signatures differed more from each other, including cases of large regional intraspecific variance, than bear species with lower 15N signatures. Bear trophic position and frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts were uncorrelated, suggesting that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. We inferred bear trophic positions from stable isotope values from hair samples of the eight species of bear in six localities. Bear species with higher 15N signatures, such as polar bears Ursus maritimus, differed more from each other than bear species with lower 15N signatures, such as giant pandas Ailuropoda melanoleuca, Asian black bears Ursus thibetanus, Andean bears Tremarctos ornatus, and American black bears Ursus americanus. The brown bear Ursus arctos was the species with highest intraspecific variance of 15N signatures. We examined diets reported in the literature and the frequency of human–bear conflicts, and correlated both variables with 15N signatures. 15N signature was correlated with diet, but not with frequency of reports of human–bear conflicts or bear trophic position. We suggest that livestock predation by bears is an opportunistic behaviour rather than a response to food availability dynamics. Bear artwork by Roger Hall.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/mam.12285</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5084-5659</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-1838
ispartof Mammal review, 2022-07, Vol.52 (3), p.322-327
issn 0305-1838
1365-2907
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2676968655
source Wiley
subjects Ailuropoda melanoleuca
bears
carnivory
Crop damage
Diet
Ecology
Food availability
Livestock
Nitrogen‐15
Omnivores
omnivory
Polar bears
Predation
Signatures
stable isotopes
trophic position
Ursidae
Ursus maritimus
title Bear diets and human–bear conflicts: insights from isotopic ecology
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A18%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bear%20diets%20and%20human%E2%80%93bear%20conflicts:%20insights%20from%20isotopic%20ecology&rft.jtitle=Mammal%20review&rft.au=Falconi,%20Nereyda&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=327&rft.pages=322-327&rft.issn=0305-1838&rft.eissn=1365-2907&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/mam.12285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2676968655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2975-67dae07f7e01dabc2415fc65d40cc4b92bd48a7134f68dbaa5d7cff3f7db41823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2676968655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true