Loading…
Hybrid Surrogate-Based Constrained Optimization With a New Constraint-Handling Method
Surrogate-based-constrained optimization for some optimization problems involving computationally expensive objective functions and constraints is still a great challenge in the optimization field. Its difficulties are of two primary types. One is how to handle the constraints, especially, equality...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE transactions on cybernetics 2022-06, Vol.52 (6), p.5394-5407 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89e21c373d3dc1a26a609b17cb7e8270e26ac85cd74f92809eba699efeac77a43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89e21c373d3dc1a26a609b17cb7e8270e26ac85cd74f92809eba699efeac77a43 |
container_end_page | 5407 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 5394 |
container_title | IEEE transactions on cybernetics |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Su, Yuanping Xu, Lihong Goodman, Erik D. |
description | Surrogate-based-constrained optimization for some optimization problems involving computationally expensive objective functions and constraints is still a great challenge in the optimization field. Its difficulties are of two primary types. One is how to handle the constraints, especially, equality constraints; another is how to sample a good point to improve the prediction of the surrogates in the feasible region. Overcoming these difficulties requires a reliable constraint-handling method and an efficient infill-sampling strategy. To perform inequality- and equality-constrained optimization of expensive black-box systems, this work proposes a hybrid surrogate-based-constrained optimization method (HSBCO), and the main innovation is that a new constraint-handling method is proposed to map the feasible region into the origin of the Euclidean subspace. Thus, if the constraint violation of an infeasible solution is large, then it is far from the origin in the Euclidean subspace. Therefore, all constraints of the problem can be transformed into an equivalent equality constraint, and the distance between an infeasible point and the origin in the Euclidean subspace represents the constraint violation of the infeasible solution. Based on the distance, the objective function of the problem can be penalized by a Gaussian penalty function, and the original constrained optimization problem becomes an unconstrained optimization problem. Thus, the feasible solutions of the original minimization problem always have a lower objective function value than any infeasible solution in the penalized objective space. To improve the optimization performance, kriging-based efficient global optimization (EGO) is used to find a locally optimal solution in the first phase of HSBCO, and starting from this locally optimal solution, RBF-model-based global search and local search strategies are introduced to seek global optimal solutions. Such a hybrid optimization strategy can help the optimization process converge to the global optimal solution within a given maximum number of function evaluations, as demonstrated in the experimental results on 23 test problems. The method is shown to achieve the global optimum more closely and efficiently than other leading methods. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3031620 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ieee_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2677849563</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9263252</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2462411297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89e21c373d3dc1a26a609b17cb7e8270e26ac85cd74f92809eba699efeac77a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQQIMoKtofIIIsePGyNZlsk81Ri1rBj4MV8RSy2alG2t2aZJH6601preBcZph5MwyPkCNG-4xRdT4evl72gQLtc8qZALpF9oGJMgeQg-1NLeQe6YXwQVOUqaXKXbLHOVAhmNonz6NF5V2dPXXet28mYn5pAtbZsG1C9MY1qX6cRzdz3ya6tsleXHzPTPaAX39MzEemqaeuecvuMb639SHZmZhpwN46H5Dn66vxcJTfPd7cDi_ucssLFfNSITDLJa95bZkBYQRVFZO2kliCpJg6thzYWhYTBSVVWBmhFE7QWClNwQ_I2eru3LefHYaoZy5YnE5Ng20XNBQCCsZAyYSe_kM_2s436TudHMmyUAPBE8VWlPVtCB4neu7dzPiFZlQvteuldr3Urtfa087J-nJXzbDebPxKTsDxCnCIuBkrEBwGwH8AA4CFew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2677849563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hybrid Surrogate-Based Constrained Optimization With a New Constraint-Handling Method</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals</source><creator>Su, Yuanping ; Xu, Lihong ; Goodman, Erik D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Su, Yuanping ; Xu, Lihong ; Goodman, Erik D.</creatorcontrib><description>Surrogate-based-constrained optimization for some optimization problems involving computationally expensive objective functions and constraints is still a great challenge in the optimization field. Its difficulties are of two primary types. One is how to handle the constraints, especially, equality constraints; another is how to sample a good point to improve the prediction of the surrogates in the feasible region. Overcoming these difficulties requires a reliable constraint-handling method and an efficient infill-sampling strategy. To perform inequality- and equality-constrained optimization of expensive black-box systems, this work proposes a hybrid surrogate-based-constrained optimization method (HSBCO), and the main innovation is that a new constraint-handling method is proposed to map the feasible region into the origin of the Euclidean subspace. Thus, if the constraint violation of an infeasible solution is large, then it is far from the origin in the Euclidean subspace. Therefore, all constraints of the problem can be transformed into an equivalent equality constraint, and the distance between an infeasible point and the origin in the Euclidean subspace represents the constraint violation of the infeasible solution. Based on the distance, the objective function of the problem can be penalized by a Gaussian penalty function, and the original constrained optimization problem becomes an unconstrained optimization problem. Thus, the feasible solutions of the original minimization problem always have a lower objective function value than any infeasible solution in the penalized objective space. To improve the optimization performance, kriging-based efficient global optimization (EGO) is used to find a locally optimal solution in the first phase of HSBCO, and starting from this locally optimal solution, RBF-model-based global search and local search strategies are introduced to seek global optimal solutions. Such a hybrid optimization strategy can help the optimization process converge to the global optimal solution within a given maximum number of function evaluations, as demonstrated in the experimental results on 23 test problems. The method is shown to achieve the global optimum more closely and efficiently than other leading methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.3031620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33206619</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCEB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IEEE</publisher><subject>Computational modeling ; Constrained optimization ; constraint handling ; Constraints ; Equality ; Gaussian penalty function ; Global optimization ; Green products ; Handling ; hybrid optimization ; Linear programming ; Meteorology ; Optimization ; Optimization methods ; Penalty function ; Search methods ; Search problems ; Subspaces ; surrogate ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2022-06, Vol.52 (6), p.5394-5407</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89e21c373d3dc1a26a609b17cb7e8270e26ac85cd74f92809eba699efeac77a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89e21c373d3dc1a26a609b17cb7e8270e26ac85cd74f92809eba699efeac77a43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2419-0692 ; 0000-0003-0533-5275 ; 0000-0002-5189-6869</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9263252$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,54771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33206619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Su, Yuanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Erik D.</creatorcontrib><title>Hybrid Surrogate-Based Constrained Optimization With a New Constraint-Handling Method</title><title>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</title><addtitle>TCYB</addtitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><description>Surrogate-based-constrained optimization for some optimization problems involving computationally expensive objective functions and constraints is still a great challenge in the optimization field. Its difficulties are of two primary types. One is how to handle the constraints, especially, equality constraints; another is how to sample a good point to improve the prediction of the surrogates in the feasible region. Overcoming these difficulties requires a reliable constraint-handling method and an efficient infill-sampling strategy. To perform inequality- and equality-constrained optimization of expensive black-box systems, this work proposes a hybrid surrogate-based-constrained optimization method (HSBCO), and the main innovation is that a new constraint-handling method is proposed to map the feasible region into the origin of the Euclidean subspace. Thus, if the constraint violation of an infeasible solution is large, then it is far from the origin in the Euclidean subspace. Therefore, all constraints of the problem can be transformed into an equivalent equality constraint, and the distance between an infeasible point and the origin in the Euclidean subspace represents the constraint violation of the infeasible solution. Based on the distance, the objective function of the problem can be penalized by a Gaussian penalty function, and the original constrained optimization problem becomes an unconstrained optimization problem. Thus, the feasible solutions of the original minimization problem always have a lower objective function value than any infeasible solution in the penalized objective space. To improve the optimization performance, kriging-based efficient global optimization (EGO) is used to find a locally optimal solution in the first phase of HSBCO, and starting from this locally optimal solution, RBF-model-based global search and local search strategies are introduced to seek global optimal solutions. Such a hybrid optimization strategy can help the optimization process converge to the global optimal solution within a given maximum number of function evaluations, as demonstrated in the experimental results on 23 test problems. The method is shown to achieve the global optimum more closely and efficiently than other leading methods.</description><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Constrained optimization</subject><subject>constraint handling</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Equality</subject><subject>Gaussian penalty function</subject><subject>Global optimization</subject><subject>Green products</subject><subject>Handling</subject><subject>hybrid optimization</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization methods</subject><subject>Penalty function</subject><subject>Search methods</subject><subject>Search problems</subject><subject>Subspaces</subject><subject>surrogate</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>2168-2267</issn><issn>2168-2275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQQIMoKtofIIIsePGyNZlsk81Ri1rBj4MV8RSy2alG2t2aZJH6601preBcZph5MwyPkCNG-4xRdT4evl72gQLtc8qZALpF9oGJMgeQg-1NLeQe6YXwQVOUqaXKXbLHOVAhmNonz6NF5V2dPXXet28mYn5pAtbZsG1C9MY1qX6cRzdz3ya6tsleXHzPTPaAX39MzEemqaeuecvuMb639SHZmZhpwN46H5Dn66vxcJTfPd7cDi_ucssLFfNSITDLJa95bZkBYQRVFZO2kliCpJg6thzYWhYTBSVVWBmhFE7QWClNwQ_I2eru3LefHYaoZy5YnE5Ng20XNBQCCsZAyYSe_kM_2s436TudHMmyUAPBE8VWlPVtCB4neu7dzPiFZlQvteuldr3Urtfa087J-nJXzbDebPxKTsDxCnCIuBkrEBwGwH8AA4CFew</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Su, Yuanping</creator><creator>Xu, Lihong</creator><creator>Goodman, Erik D.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-0692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-5275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-6869</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>Hybrid Surrogate-Based Constrained Optimization With a New Constraint-Handling Method</title><author>Su, Yuanping ; Xu, Lihong ; Goodman, Erik D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89e21c373d3dc1a26a609b17cb7e8270e26ac85cd74f92809eba699efeac77a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Constrained optimization</topic><topic>constraint handling</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Equality</topic><topic>Gaussian penalty function</topic><topic>Global optimization</topic><topic>Green products</topic><topic>Handling</topic><topic>hybrid optimization</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization methods</topic><topic>Penalty function</topic><topic>Search methods</topic><topic>Search problems</topic><topic>Subspaces</topic><topic>surrogate</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Su, Yuanping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, Erik D.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005–Present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library Online</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Su, Yuanping</au><au>Xu, Lihong</au><au>Goodman, Erik D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hybrid Surrogate-Based Constrained Optimization With a New Constraint-Handling Method</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>TCYB</stitle><addtitle>IEEE Trans Cybern</addtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>5394</spage><epage>5407</epage><pages>5394-5407</pages><issn>2168-2267</issn><eissn>2168-2275</eissn><coden>ITCEB8</coden><abstract>Surrogate-based-constrained optimization for some optimization problems involving computationally expensive objective functions and constraints is still a great challenge in the optimization field. Its difficulties are of two primary types. One is how to handle the constraints, especially, equality constraints; another is how to sample a good point to improve the prediction of the surrogates in the feasible region. Overcoming these difficulties requires a reliable constraint-handling method and an efficient infill-sampling strategy. To perform inequality- and equality-constrained optimization of expensive black-box systems, this work proposes a hybrid surrogate-based-constrained optimization method (HSBCO), and the main innovation is that a new constraint-handling method is proposed to map the feasible region into the origin of the Euclidean subspace. Thus, if the constraint violation of an infeasible solution is large, then it is far from the origin in the Euclidean subspace. Therefore, all constraints of the problem can be transformed into an equivalent equality constraint, and the distance between an infeasible point and the origin in the Euclidean subspace represents the constraint violation of the infeasible solution. Based on the distance, the objective function of the problem can be penalized by a Gaussian penalty function, and the original constrained optimization problem becomes an unconstrained optimization problem. Thus, the feasible solutions of the original minimization problem always have a lower objective function value than any infeasible solution in the penalized objective space. To improve the optimization performance, kriging-based efficient global optimization (EGO) is used to find a locally optimal solution in the first phase of HSBCO, and starting from this locally optimal solution, RBF-model-based global search and local search strategies are introduced to seek global optimal solutions. Such a hybrid optimization strategy can help the optimization process converge to the global optimal solution within a given maximum number of function evaluations, as demonstrated in the experimental results on 23 test problems. The method is shown to achieve the global optimum more closely and efficiently than other leading methods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>33206619</pmid><doi>10.1109/TCYB.2020.3031620</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-0692</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0533-5275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5189-6869</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-2267 |
ispartof | IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2022-06, Vol.52 (6), p.5394-5407 |
issn | 2168-2267 2168-2275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2677849563 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Journals |
subjects | Computational modeling Constrained optimization constraint handling Constraints Equality Gaussian penalty function Global optimization Green products Handling hybrid optimization Linear programming Meteorology Optimization Optimization methods Penalty function Search methods Search problems Subspaces surrogate Weather forecasting |
title | Hybrid Surrogate-Based Constrained Optimization With a New Constraint-Handling Method |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A30%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ieee_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hybrid%20Surrogate-Based%20Constrained%20Optimization%20With%20a%20New%20Constraint-Handling%20Method&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20cybernetics&rft.au=Su,%20Yuanping&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=5394&rft.epage=5407&rft.pages=5394-5407&rft.issn=2168-2267&rft.eissn=2168-2275&rft.coden=ITCEB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCYB.2020.3031620&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ieee_%3E2462411297%3C/proquest_ieee_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-89e21c373d3dc1a26a609b17cb7e8270e26ac85cd74f92809eba699efeac77a43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2677849563&rft_id=info:pmid/33206619&rft_ieee_id=9263252&rfr_iscdi=true |