Loading…
Rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla using lateral disc implants avoiding ridge augmentation in cases with inadequate bone height: A clinical evaluation
Context: Implant-retained prosthodontic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla is challenging owing to the compromised characteristics of the residual alveolar bone which might require several adjunctive surgical procedures to augment the available alveolar bone. Aims: This study aims to evaluate t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of dental implants 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.31-37 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 37 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 31 |
container_title | Journal of dental implants |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Sanjay Roy Chowdhury Shadamarshan, R Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar |
description | Context: Implant-retained prosthodontic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla is challenging owing to the compromised characteristics of the residual alveolar bone which might require several adjunctive surgical procedures to augment the available alveolar bone. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the outcome of rehabilitated maxillary posterior edentulous space with lateral disc implants in subjects with inadequate bone height. Subject and Methods: Forty patients with edentulous span in posterior maxilla with inadequate volume of bone were rehabilitated with lateral disc implant-retained prosthesis. Follow-up was undertaken at the end of 06, 12, 24, and 36 months by allocating the implants into the groups assessed according to the Misch Implant quality scale. A total of 6 Single disc, 22 Double disc, and 12 triple disc implants were placed. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics. Results: At the end of 06 months, 96.6% were in Group 1, 3.3% were assessed to be in Group 2. At 12 months, 95% were in Group 1, 1.6% in Group 2, and 3.3% in Group 3. At 24 months, 95% were in Group 1, 3.3% were in Group 2, and 1.6% were in Group 3. At 36 months, 96.6% were assessed in Group 1 while 1.6% each was in Group 2 and 4. Conclusions: A clinical success of 98.4% has been established and is concluded that Lateral disc implants provide a viable alternative to the contemporary management protocol involving a sinus lift. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/jdi.jdi_19_21 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678612049</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2678612049</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c669-7a14bd2b1a485b4c57b38cd59524a30c1334db51a67dd9c682d780e3364950d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkNtKAzEQhhdRsNReeh_wujXZZA_xrhRPUBCk98tsku5OSZN2s6k-j09qtB0Y5sT_DfxZds_oQjDKH3caFykbJpucXWUTKisxr-qCXl_6sqrZbTYLYUdTlLWQRTHJfj5NDy1aHGFE74jfEqONG6P1MZCDD6MZ0A9kD99oLZAY0HXEQlqDJRqDIrg_WHBjIHDyqP_OA-rOEIjdPpHOXHREQTCBfOHYpwm0OcZEIa13hvQGu358IkuiLDpUCW1OYOO_9i672YINZnap02zz8rxZvc3XH6_vq-V6rspSzitgotV5y0DURStUUbW8VrqQRS6AU8U4F7otGJSV1lKVda6rmhrOy2QE1ZJPs4cz9jD4YzRhbHY-Di59bPLkXclyKiT_BcK6cWk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678612049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla using lateral disc implants avoiding ridge augmentation in cases with inadequate bone height: A clinical evaluation</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Sanjay Roy Chowdhury ; Shadamarshan, R ; Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Sanjay Roy Chowdhury ; Shadamarshan, R ; Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar</creatorcontrib><description>Context: Implant-retained prosthodontic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla is challenging owing to the compromised characteristics of the residual alveolar bone which might require several adjunctive surgical procedures to augment the available alveolar bone. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the outcome of rehabilitated maxillary posterior edentulous space with lateral disc implants in subjects with inadequate bone height. Subject and Methods: Forty patients with edentulous span in posterior maxilla with inadequate volume of bone were rehabilitated with lateral disc implant-retained prosthesis. Follow-up was undertaken at the end of 06, 12, 24, and 36 months by allocating the implants into the groups assessed according to the Misch Implant quality scale. A total of 6 Single disc, 22 Double disc, and 12 triple disc implants were placed. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics. Results: At the end of 06 months, 96.6% were in Group 1, 3.3% were assessed to be in Group 2. At 12 months, 95% were in Group 1, 1.6% in Group 2, and 3.3% in Group 3. At 24 months, 95% were in Group 1, 3.3% were in Group 2, and 1.6% were in Group 3. At 36 months, 96.6% were assessed in Group 1 while 1.6% each was in Group 2 and 4. Conclusions: A clinical success of 98.4% has been established and is concluded that Lateral disc implants provide a viable alternative to the contemporary management protocol involving a sinus lift.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-6781</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-7850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/jdi.jdi_19_21</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mumbai: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Alveolar bone ; Bone implants ; Edentulous ; Maxilla ; Rehabilitation ; Statistical analysis ; Transplants & implants</subject><ispartof>Journal of dental implants, 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.31-37</ispartof><rights>2022. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2678612049?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sanjay Roy Chowdhury</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadamarshan, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar</creatorcontrib><title>Rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla using lateral disc implants avoiding ridge augmentation in cases with inadequate bone height: A clinical evaluation</title><title>Journal of dental implants</title><description>Context: Implant-retained prosthodontic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla is challenging owing to the compromised characteristics of the residual alveolar bone which might require several adjunctive surgical procedures to augment the available alveolar bone. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the outcome of rehabilitated maxillary posterior edentulous space with lateral disc implants in subjects with inadequate bone height. Subject and Methods: Forty patients with edentulous span in posterior maxilla with inadequate volume of bone were rehabilitated with lateral disc implant-retained prosthesis. Follow-up was undertaken at the end of 06, 12, 24, and 36 months by allocating the implants into the groups assessed according to the Misch Implant quality scale. A total of 6 Single disc, 22 Double disc, and 12 triple disc implants were placed. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics. Results: At the end of 06 months, 96.6% were in Group 1, 3.3% were assessed to be in Group 2. At 12 months, 95% were in Group 1, 1.6% in Group 2, and 3.3% in Group 3. At 24 months, 95% were in Group 1, 3.3% were in Group 2, and 1.6% were in Group 3. At 36 months, 96.6% were assessed in Group 1 while 1.6% each was in Group 2 and 4. Conclusions: A clinical success of 98.4% has been established and is concluded that Lateral disc implants provide a viable alternative to the contemporary management protocol involving a sinus lift.</description><subject>Alveolar bone</subject><subject>Bone implants</subject><subject>Edentulous</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0974-6781</issn><issn>0974-7850</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkNtKAzEQhhdRsNReeh_wujXZZA_xrhRPUBCk98tsku5OSZN2s6k-j09qtB0Y5sT_DfxZds_oQjDKH3caFykbJpucXWUTKisxr-qCXl_6sqrZbTYLYUdTlLWQRTHJfj5NDy1aHGFE74jfEqONG6P1MZCDD6MZ0A9kD99oLZAY0HXEQlqDJRqDIrg_WHBjIHDyqP_OA-rOEIjdPpHOXHREQTCBfOHYpwm0OcZEIa13hvQGu358IkuiLDpUCW1OYOO_9i672YINZnap02zz8rxZvc3XH6_vq-V6rspSzitgotV5y0DURStUUbW8VrqQRS6AU8U4F7otGJSV1lKVda6rmhrOy2QE1ZJPs4cz9jD4YzRhbHY-Di59bPLkXclyKiT_BcK6cWk</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Sanjay Roy Chowdhury</creator><creator>Shadamarshan, R</creator><creator>Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar</creator><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla using lateral disc implants avoiding ridge augmentation in cases with inadequate bone height: A clinical evaluation</title><author>Sanjay Roy Chowdhury ; Shadamarshan, R ; Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669-7a14bd2b1a485b4c57b38cd59524a30c1334db51a67dd9c682d780e3364950d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alveolar bone</topic><topic>Bone implants</topic><topic>Edentulous</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sanjay Roy Chowdhury</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadamarshan, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of dental implants</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sanjay Roy Chowdhury</au><au>Shadamarshan, R</au><au>Krishnaprabhu, Rajkumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla using lateral disc implants avoiding ridge augmentation in cases with inadequate bone height: A clinical evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dental implants</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>31-37</pages><issn>0974-6781</issn><eissn>0974-7850</eissn><abstract>Context: Implant-retained prosthodontic rehabilitation of the posterior maxilla is challenging owing to the compromised characteristics of the residual alveolar bone which might require several adjunctive surgical procedures to augment the available alveolar bone. Aims: This study aims to evaluate the outcome of rehabilitated maxillary posterior edentulous space with lateral disc implants in subjects with inadequate bone height. Subject and Methods: Forty patients with edentulous span in posterior maxilla with inadequate volume of bone were rehabilitated with lateral disc implant-retained prosthesis. Follow-up was undertaken at the end of 06, 12, 24, and 36 months by allocating the implants into the groups assessed according to the Misch Implant quality scale. A total of 6 Single disc, 22 Double disc, and 12 triple disc implants were placed. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics. Results: At the end of 06 months, 96.6% were in Group 1, 3.3% were assessed to be in Group 2. At 12 months, 95% were in Group 1, 1.6% in Group 2, and 3.3% in Group 3. At 24 months, 95% were in Group 1, 3.3% were in Group 2, and 1.6% were in Group 3. At 36 months, 96.6% were assessed in Group 1 while 1.6% each was in Group 2 and 4. Conclusions: A clinical success of 98.4% has been established and is concluded that Lateral disc implants provide a viable alternative to the contemporary management protocol involving a sinus lift.</abstract><cop>Mumbai</cop><pub>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/jdi.jdi_19_21</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0974-6781 |
ispartof | Journal of dental implants, 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.31-37 |
issn | 0974-6781 0974-7850 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2678612049 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Alveolar bone Bone implants Edentulous Maxilla Rehabilitation Statistical analysis Transplants & implants |
title | Rehabilitation of edentulous posterior maxilla using lateral disc implants avoiding ridge augmentation in cases with inadequate bone height: A clinical evaluation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rehabilitation%20of%20edentulous%20posterior%20maxilla%20using%20lateral%20disc%20implants%20avoiding%20ridge%20augmentation%20in%20cases%20with%20inadequate%20bone%20height:%20A%20clinical%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dental%20implants&rft.au=Sanjay%20Roy%20Chowdhury&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=31-37&rft.issn=0974-6781&rft.eissn=0974-7850&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/jdi.jdi_19_21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2678612049%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c669-7a14bd2b1a485b4c57b38cd59524a30c1334db51a67dd9c682d780e3364950d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678612049&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |