Loading…
The politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism: A comparative case study of ride-hailing platforms in China and the United States
This article uses a comparative case study of two ride-hailing platforms—DiDi Chuxing in China and Uber in the United States—to explore the comparative politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism. Surveillance capitalism is an emerging economic system that translates human experiences into...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global media and China 2022-06, Vol.7 (2), p.131-150 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4ca17a2abc499dbdb631c64db24539e9a3724097f035b7661d13b6444d0549593 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4ca17a2abc499dbdb631c64db24539e9a3724097f035b7661d13b6444d0549593 |
container_end_page | 150 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Global media and China |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Chan, Ngai Keung Kwok, Chi |
description | This article uses a comparative case study of two ride-hailing platforms—DiDi Chuxing in China and Uber in the United States—to explore the comparative politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism. Surveillance capitalism is an emerging economic system that translates human experiences into surveillance assets for behavioral predictions and modifications. Through this comparative study, we demonstrate how DiDi and Uber articulate their operational legitimacy for advancing their corporate interests and visions of datafication in the face of legal uncertainty. Although DiDi and Uber are both “sectoral platforms” in urban mobility with similar visions of datafication and infrastructuralization, we highlight that they deploy different discursive legitimation strategies. Our study shows that Uber adopts a “confrontational” strategy, while DiDi employs a “collaborative” strategy when they need to legitimize their data and business practices to the public and regulatory authorities. This study offers a comparative lens to examine the social and political dynamics of platform firms based in China and the United States and, therefore, contributes to understanding the various aspirational logic of platform thinking in different political contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/20594364211046769 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2678681838</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_20594364211046769</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2678681838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4ca17a2abc499dbdb631c64db24539e9a3724097f035b7661d13b6444d0549593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtqwzAQRU1poSHNB3Qn6NqpZMmS1V0IfUGgiyZrM5bkRMGvSnJK_qEfXZuUdFG6muHO3HOZiaJbgueECHGf4FQyyllCCGZccHkRTUYtZlQkl-ees-to5v0eY0wyIRIqJ9HXemdQ11Y2WOVRW6KuglC2rh7ET-OQbZDv3cHYqoJGGaSgswEq6-sHtECqrTtwEOxhnHiDfOj1ccQ4q028A1vZZntm-hG33NkGEDQahSF609hgNHoPEIy_ia5KqLyZ_dRptHl6XC9f4tXb8-tysYoVTdMQMwVEQAKFYlLqQhecEsWZLhKWUmkkDFczLEWJaVoIzokmtOCMMY1TJlNJp9Hdidu59qM3PuT7tnfNEJknXGQ8IxnNhi1y2lKu9d6ZMu-crcEdc4Lz8e_5n78PnvnJ42Frfqn_G74B9-yDDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2678681838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism: A comparative case study of ride-hailing platforms in China and the United States</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><description>This article uses a comparative case study of two ride-hailing platforms—DiDi Chuxing in China and Uber in the United States—to explore the comparative politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism. Surveillance capitalism is an emerging economic system that translates human experiences into surveillance assets for behavioral predictions and modifications. Through this comparative study, we demonstrate how DiDi and Uber articulate their operational legitimacy for advancing their corporate interests and visions of datafication in the face of legal uncertainty. Although DiDi and Uber are both “sectoral platforms” in urban mobility with similar visions of datafication and infrastructuralization, we highlight that they deploy different discursive legitimation strategies. Our study shows that Uber adopts a “confrontational” strategy, while DiDi employs a “collaborative” strategy when they need to legitimize their data and business practices to the public and regulatory authorities. This study offers a comparative lens to examine the social and political dynamics of platform firms based in China and the United States and, therefore, contributes to understanding the various aspirational logic of platform thinking in different political contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2059-4364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2059-4372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/20594364211046769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Capitalism ; Case studies ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative politics ; Comparative studies ; Economic systems ; Legitimacy ; Legitimation ; Mobility ; Power ; Social dynamics ; Social systems ; Surveillance ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Global media and China, 2022-06, Vol.7 (2), p.131-150</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4ca17a2abc499dbdb631c64db24539e9a3724097f035b7661d13b6444d0549593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4ca17a2abc499dbdb631c64db24539e9a3724097f035b7661d13b6444d0549593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5848-3098 ; 0000-0003-3754-2447</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20594364211046769$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2678681838?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,12847,21966,25753,27344,27853,27924,27925,33223,33774,37012,44590,44945,45333</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><title>The politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism: A comparative case study of ride-hailing platforms in China and the United States</title><title>Global media and China</title><description>This article uses a comparative case study of two ride-hailing platforms—DiDi Chuxing in China and Uber in the United States—to explore the comparative politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism. Surveillance capitalism is an emerging economic system that translates human experiences into surveillance assets for behavioral predictions and modifications. Through this comparative study, we demonstrate how DiDi and Uber articulate their operational legitimacy for advancing their corporate interests and visions of datafication in the face of legal uncertainty. Although DiDi and Uber are both “sectoral platforms” in urban mobility with similar visions of datafication and infrastructuralization, we highlight that they deploy different discursive legitimation strategies. Our study shows that Uber adopts a “confrontational” strategy, while DiDi employs a “collaborative” strategy when they need to legitimize their data and business practices to the public and regulatory authorities. This study offers a comparative lens to examine the social and political dynamics of platform firms based in China and the United States and, therefore, contributes to understanding the various aspirational logic of platform thinking in different political contexts.</description><subject>Capitalism</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Economic systems</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Legitimation</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Social dynamics</subject><subject>Social systems</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2059-4364</issn><issn>2059-4372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtqwzAQRU1poSHNB3Qn6NqpZMmS1V0IfUGgiyZrM5bkRMGvSnJK_qEfXZuUdFG6muHO3HOZiaJbgueECHGf4FQyyllCCGZccHkRTUYtZlQkl-ees-to5v0eY0wyIRIqJ9HXemdQ11Y2WOVRW6KuglC2rh7ET-OQbZDv3cHYqoJGGaSgswEq6-sHtECqrTtwEOxhnHiDfOj1ccQ4q028A1vZZntm-hG33NkGEDQahSF609hgNHoPEIy_ia5KqLyZ_dRptHl6XC9f4tXb8-tysYoVTdMQMwVEQAKFYlLqQhecEsWZLhKWUmkkDFczLEWJaVoIzokmtOCMMY1TJlNJp9Hdidu59qM3PuT7tnfNEJknXGQ8IxnNhi1y2lKu9d6ZMu-crcEdc4Lz8e_5n78PnvnJ42Frfqn_G74B9-yDDQ</recordid><startdate>20220601</startdate><enddate>20220601</enddate><creator>Chan, Ngai Keung</creator><creator>Kwok, Chi</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-2447</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220601</creationdate><title>The politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism: A comparative case study of ride-hailing platforms in China and the United States</title><author>Chan, Ngai Keung ; Kwok, Chi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4ca17a2abc499dbdb631c64db24539e9a3724097f035b7661d13b6444d0549593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Capitalism</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Economic systems</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Legitimation</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Social dynamics</topic><topic>Social systems</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ngai Keung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwok, Chi</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Global media and China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Ngai Keung</au><au>Kwok, Chi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism: A comparative case study of ride-hailing platforms in China and the United States</atitle><jtitle>Global media and China</jtitle><date>2022-06-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>150</epage><pages>131-150</pages><issn>2059-4364</issn><eissn>2059-4372</eissn><abstract>This article uses a comparative case study of two ride-hailing platforms—DiDi Chuxing in China and Uber in the United States—to explore the comparative politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism. Surveillance capitalism is an emerging economic system that translates human experiences into surveillance assets for behavioral predictions and modifications. Through this comparative study, we demonstrate how DiDi and Uber articulate their operational legitimacy for advancing their corporate interests and visions of datafication in the face of legal uncertainty. Although DiDi and Uber are both “sectoral platforms” in urban mobility with similar visions of datafication and infrastructuralization, we highlight that they deploy different discursive legitimation strategies. Our study shows that Uber adopts a “confrontational” strategy, while DiDi employs a “collaborative” strategy when they need to legitimize their data and business practices to the public and regulatory authorities. This study offers a comparative lens to examine the social and political dynamics of platform firms based in China and the United States and, therefore, contributes to understanding the various aspirational logic of platform thinking in different political contexts.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/20594364211046769</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5848-3098</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-2447</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2059-4364 |
ispartof | Global media and China, 2022-06, Vol.7 (2), p.131-150 |
issn | 2059-4364 2059-4372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2678681838 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Publicly Available Content Database; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Capitalism Case studies Comparative analysis Comparative politics Comparative studies Economic systems Legitimacy Legitimation Mobility Power Social dynamics Social systems Surveillance Uncertainty |
title | The politics of platform power in surveillance capitalism: A comparative case study of ride-hailing platforms in China and the United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T02%3A00%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20politics%20of%20platform%20power%20in%20surveillance%20capitalism:%20A%20comparative%20case%20study%20of%20ride-hailing%20platforms%20in%20China%20and%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Global%20media%20and%20China&rft.au=Chan,%20Ngai%20Keung&rft.date=2022-06-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=150&rft.pages=131-150&rft.issn=2059-4364&rft.eissn=2059-4372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/20594364211046769&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2678681838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-4ca17a2abc499dbdb631c64db24539e9a3724097f035b7661d13b6444d0549593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2678681838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_20594364211046769&rfr_iscdi=true |