Loading…

Is walking maintained following discharge from prosthetic rehabilitation?

PURPOSE: To determine if people who walked with a lower limb prosthesis on discharge from rehabilitation continued to 20 weeks after discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cohort study design. People with major lower extremity amputation (LEA) who were discharged from rehabilitation usin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiotherapy practice and research 2022-01, Vol.43 (1), p.125-132
Main Authors: Curtin, Kate, Walsh, Mary, Stow, Jacqui, Malone, Ailish
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:PURPOSE: To determine if people who walked with a lower limb prosthesis on discharge from rehabilitation continued to 20 weeks after discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational cohort study design. People with major lower extremity amputation (LEA) who were discharged from rehabilitation using a prosthesis to walk and were due for prosthetic review appointment (20 weeks following discharge) during the period of data collection were eligible to be included. The primary outcome was the continuation of walking with a lower limb prosthesis at this time point (T2). Secondary outcome measures were: Timed Up and Go (TUG), Two Minute Walk Test (2MWT), SIGAM score, Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), and Orthotic Prosthetic User Survey- Quality of Life (OPUS-QOL). Secondary outcomes were assessed at time of discharge from rehabilitation (T1) and repeated at T2. Statistical analysis was carried out comparing the results of the secondary outcome measures at T1 and T2. RESULTS: 22/28 participants were still walking with their prostheses at T2. Five of the six who abandoned walking with their prostheses did so because of issues with the skin on their residuum or contralateral foot. Participants who continued to walk with their prostheses demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in TUG (5.01 seconds, p 
ISSN:2213-0683
2213-0691
DOI:10.3233/PPR-210618