Loading…

Associations Between Race and Violence Risk Appraisals Using Structured Professional Judgment

Racial disparities in criminal justice processes and outcomes have garnered considerable attention. Whether and how risk assessment instruments might contribute to such discrepancies are critical questions. However, tools based on the widely applied structured professional judgment (SPJ) model have...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of threat assessment and management 2023-06, Vol.10 (2), p.99-111
Main Authors: Hogan, Neil R., Corabian, Gabriela
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 111
container_issue 2
container_start_page 99
container_title Journal of threat assessment and management
container_volume 10
creator Hogan, Neil R.
Corabian, Gabriela
description Racial disparities in criminal justice processes and outcomes have garnered considerable attention. Whether and how risk assessment instruments might contribute to such discrepancies are critical questions. However, tools based on the widely applied structured professional judgment (SPJ) model have received little attention in this regard. This study investigated relationships between race and violence risk appraisals derived from two commonly used SPJ tools, the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management 20 (HCR-20V3) and the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA-V3), using a database of 337 diverse individuals' information. Results were mixed with respect to racial disparity. Race was not clearly associated with summary ratings on the HCR-20V3. However, being Indigenous predicted high-risk ratings on the SARA-V3 after controlling for risk factors and criminal history, but not after controlling for actuarial risk scores. While the results were promising in many respects, they nonetheless suggest that associations between race and SPJ risk appraisals warrant further empirical study. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrates that racial disparities may be observed among risk appraisals derived from structured professional judgment tools, based on a sample of Canadian Indigenous and non-Indigenous persons. The results were mixed and do not identify causes of the disparities, but they provide an impetus and clear directions for further study to further the aim of racial justice in risk assessment.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/tam0000185
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2679819590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2679819590</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a980-1f1fe1444434ded2fe8f51890218083862c0b90eb600e2ede85fb2dfd3f365b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRcvYK198Rcs-CZE95LL7mMtXikotfomYZudLalpEncSpP_eDRWdl2GY7xxmDiHnnF1xJrPrzmxZKK6SAzISPNVRrBJ2SE55LKXSqRby6G8RixMyQdwMiizTPGMj8jFFbIrSdGVTI72B7hugpgtTADW1pe9lU0EdhkWJn3Tatt6UaCqkb1jWa_ra-b7oeg-WvvjGAWKwMRV96u16C3V3Ro5doGHy28dkeXe7nD1E8-f7x9l0HhmtWMQdd8DjUDK2YIUD5RKuNBNcMSVVKgq20gxWKWMgwIJK3EpYZ6WTabISckwu9ratb756wC7fNL0Ph2Au0kwrrhPNAnW5pwrfIHpweevLrfG7nLN8SDP_T_MfNq3JW9wVxndlUQEWvffhs4EddCLXWv4Ah4105g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2679819590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associations Between Race and Violence Risk Appraisals Using Structured Professional Judgment</title><source>PsycArticles (EBSCO)</source><creator>Hogan, Neil R. ; Corabian, Gabriela</creator><contributor>Wachsmuth, Wendi ; Bailey, Tyson D ; Bolante, Rebecca ; Benincasa, Charles A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Neil R. ; Corabian, Gabriela ; Wachsmuth, Wendi ; Bailey, Tyson D ; Bolante, Rebecca ; Benincasa, Charles A</creatorcontrib><description>Racial disparities in criminal justice processes and outcomes have garnered considerable attention. Whether and how risk assessment instruments might contribute to such discrepancies are critical questions. However, tools based on the widely applied structured professional judgment (SPJ) model have received little attention in this regard. This study investigated relationships between race and violence risk appraisals derived from two commonly used SPJ tools, the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management 20 (HCR-20V3) and the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA-V3), using a database of 337 diverse individuals' information. Results were mixed with respect to racial disparity. Race was not clearly associated with summary ratings on the HCR-20V3. However, being Indigenous predicted high-risk ratings on the SARA-V3 after controlling for risk factors and criminal history, but not after controlling for actuarial risk scores. While the results were promising in many respects, they nonetheless suggest that associations between race and SPJ risk appraisals warrant further empirical study. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrates that racial disparities may be observed among risk appraisals derived from structured professional judgment tools, based on a sample of Canadian Indigenous and non-Indigenous persons. The results were mixed and do not identify causes of the disparities, but they provide an impetus and clear directions for further study to further the aim of racial justice in risk assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-4842</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433896923</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433896934</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433896927</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433896931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4850</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/tam0000185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Criminal Justice ; Female ; Human ; Judgment ; Male ; Racial Disparities ; Rating ; Risk Assessment ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of threat assessment and management, 2023-06, Vol.10 (2), p.99-111</ispartof><rights>2022 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2022, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1109-5901</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Wachsmuth, Wendi</contributor><contributor>Bailey, Tyson D</contributor><contributor>Bolante, Rebecca</contributor><contributor>Benincasa, Charles A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Neil R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corabian, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><title>Associations Between Race and Violence Risk Appraisals Using Structured Professional Judgment</title><title>Journal of threat assessment and management</title><description>Racial disparities in criminal justice processes and outcomes have garnered considerable attention. Whether and how risk assessment instruments might contribute to such discrepancies are critical questions. However, tools based on the widely applied structured professional judgment (SPJ) model have received little attention in this regard. This study investigated relationships between race and violence risk appraisals derived from two commonly used SPJ tools, the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management 20 (HCR-20V3) and the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA-V3), using a database of 337 diverse individuals' information. Results were mixed with respect to racial disparity. Race was not clearly associated with summary ratings on the HCR-20V3. However, being Indigenous predicted high-risk ratings on the SARA-V3 after controlling for risk factors and criminal history, but not after controlling for actuarial risk scores. While the results were promising in many respects, they nonetheless suggest that associations between race and SPJ risk appraisals warrant further empirical study. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrates that racial disparities may be observed among risk appraisals derived from structured professional judgment tools, based on a sample of Canadian Indigenous and non-Indigenous persons. The results were mixed and do not identify causes of the disparities, but they provide an impetus and clear directions for further study to further the aim of racial justice in risk assessment.</description><subject>Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Racial Disparities</subject><subject>Rating</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>2169-4842</issn><issn>2169-4850</issn><isbn>1433896923</isbn><isbn>9781433896934</isbn><isbn>9781433896927</isbn><isbn>1433896931</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkFtLw0AQhRcvYK198Rcs-CZE95LL7mMtXikotfomYZudLalpEncSpP_eDRWdl2GY7xxmDiHnnF1xJrPrzmxZKK6SAzISPNVRrBJ2SE55LKXSqRby6G8RixMyQdwMiizTPGMj8jFFbIrSdGVTI72B7hugpgtTADW1pe9lU0EdhkWJn3Tatt6UaCqkb1jWa_ra-b7oeg-WvvjGAWKwMRV96u16C3V3Ro5doGHy28dkeXe7nD1E8-f7x9l0HhmtWMQdd8DjUDK2YIUD5RKuNBNcMSVVKgq20gxWKWMgwIJK3EpYZ6WTabISckwu9ratb756wC7fNL0Ph2Au0kwrrhPNAnW5pwrfIHpweevLrfG7nLN8SDP_T_MfNq3JW9wVxndlUQEWvffhs4EddCLXWv4Ah4105g</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Hogan, Neil R.</creator><creator>Corabian, Gabriela</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-5901</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Associations Between Race and Violence Risk Appraisals Using Structured Professional Judgment</title><author>Hogan, Neil R. ; Corabian, Gabriela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a980-1f1fe1444434ded2fe8f51890218083862c0b90eb600e2ede85fb2dfd3f365b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Racial Disparities</topic><topic>Rating</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hogan, Neil R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corabian, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycARTICLES</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Journal of threat assessment and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hogan, Neil R.</au><au>Corabian, Gabriela</au><au>Wachsmuth, Wendi</au><au>Bailey, Tyson D</au><au>Bolante, Rebecca</au><au>Benincasa, Charles A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associations Between Race and Violence Risk Appraisals Using Structured Professional Judgment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of threat assessment and management</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>99-111</pages><issn>2169-4842</issn><eissn>2169-4850</eissn><isbn>1433896923</isbn><isbn>9781433896934</isbn><isbn>9781433896927</isbn><isbn>1433896931</isbn><abstract>Racial disparities in criminal justice processes and outcomes have garnered considerable attention. Whether and how risk assessment instruments might contribute to such discrepancies are critical questions. However, tools based on the widely applied structured professional judgment (SPJ) model have received little attention in this regard. This study investigated relationships between race and violence risk appraisals derived from two commonly used SPJ tools, the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management 20 (HCR-20V3) and the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA-V3), using a database of 337 diverse individuals' information. Results were mixed with respect to racial disparity. Race was not clearly associated with summary ratings on the HCR-20V3. However, being Indigenous predicted high-risk ratings on the SARA-V3 after controlling for risk factors and criminal history, but not after controlling for actuarial risk scores. While the results were promising in many respects, they nonetheless suggest that associations between race and SPJ risk appraisals warrant further empirical study. Public Significance Statement This study demonstrates that racial disparities may be observed among risk appraisals derived from structured professional judgment tools, based on a sample of Canadian Indigenous and non-Indigenous persons. The results were mixed and do not identify causes of the disparities, but they provide an impetus and clear directions for further study to further the aim of racial justice in risk assessment.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/tam0000185</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1109-5901</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-4842
ispartof Journal of threat assessment and management, 2023-06, Vol.10 (2), p.99-111
issn 2169-4842
2169-4850
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2679819590
source PsycArticles (EBSCO)
subjects Criminal Justice
Female
Human
Judgment
Male
Racial Disparities
Rating
Risk Assessment
Violence
title Associations Between Race and Violence Risk Appraisals Using Structured Professional Judgment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A40%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associations%20Between%20Race%20and%20Violence%20Risk%20Appraisals%20Using%20Structured%20Professional%20Judgment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20threat%20assessment%20and%20management&rft.au=Hogan,%20Neil%20R.&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=99-111&rft.issn=2169-4842&rft.eissn=2169-4850&rft.isbn=1433896923&rft.isbn_list=9781433896934&rft.isbn_list=9781433896927&rft.isbn_list=1433896931&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/tam0000185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2679819590%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a980-1f1fe1444434ded2fe8f51890218083862c0b90eb600e2ede85fb2dfd3f365b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2679819590&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true