Food supply and individual quality influence seabird energy expenditure and reproductive success

• Published in: Oecologia 2022-06, Vol.199 (2), p.367-376
• Main Authors: Kahane-Rapport, Shirel R., Whelan, Shannon, Ammendolia, Justine, Hatch, Scott A., Elliott, Kyle H., Jacobs, Shoshanah
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal breeding; Aquatic birds; Availability; Behavioral Ecology–Original Research; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Birds; Breeding; Breeding success; Colonies; Ecology; Energy; Energy conservation; Energy expenditure; Energy intake; Energy output; Environmental factors; Food; Food availability; Food quality; Food supply; Foraging; Foraging behavior; Hydrology/Water Resources; Individual rearing; Life Sciences; Marine environment; Offspring; Physiological effects; Physiological factors; Plant Sciences; Reproduction; Seabirds; Survival
• ISSN: 0029-8549; 1432-1939
• DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05191-y

Breeding animals trade off maximizing energy output to increase their number of offspring with conserving energy to ensure their own survival, leading to an energetic ceiling influenced by external, environmental factors or by internal, physiological factors. We examined whether internal or external factors limited energy expenditure by supplementally feeding breeding black-legged kittiwakes varying in individual quality, based on earlier work that defined late breeders as low-quality and early breeders as high-quality individuals. We tested whether energy expenditure increased when food availability decreased in both low- and high-quality birds; we predicted this would only occur in high-quality individuals capable of sustaining high levels of energy expenditure. Here, we find that food-supplemented birds expended less energy than control birds because they spent more time at the colony. However, foraging trips of food-supplemented birds were only slightly shorter than control birds, implying that food-supplemented birds were limited by food availability at sea similarly to control birds. Late breeders expended less energy, suggesting that low-quality individuals may not intake the energy necessary for sustaining high-energy output. Food-supplemented birds had more offspring than control birds, but offspring number did not influence energy expenditure, supporting the idea that the birds reached an energy ceiling. Males and lighter birds expended more energy, possibly compensating for relatively higher energy intake. Chick-rearing birds were working near their maximum, with highest levels of expenditure for early-laying (high-quality) individuals foraging at sea. Due to fluctuating marine environments, kittiwakes may be forced to change their foraging behaviors to maintain the balance between reproduction and survival.