Loading…
Comparative efficacy of few disinfectants against bacterial load in pig facilities at livestock farm complex, Chennai
Disinfection of animal shed means making them free from disease producing organisms. An attempt has been made to assess the efficacy of disinfectants. The study was carried out in three different seasons of the year during 2017-18 in pig fattener facilities and farrowing pen at Livestock Farm Comple...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of applied and natural science 2020, Vol.12 (2), p.79-83 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c136t-8ec413500dede228d574bcde70631186b45f28ac8f6ef434c5f8ffe540f2c2113 |
container_end_page | 83 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Journal of applied and natural science |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Divyalakshmi, D. Kumaravelu, N. Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B. Thamil Vanan, Thanga Tensingh Gnanaraj, P. |
description | Disinfection of animal shed means making them free from disease producing organisms. An attempt has been made to assess the efficacy of disinfectants. The study was carried out in three different seasons of the year during 2017-18 in pig fattener facilities and farrowing pen at Livestock Farm Complex, Madhavaram, Chennai. Four disinfectants namely, chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite and cow urine based disinfectant were used. The efficacy of the disinfectants was found out by dilution method. In pig fattener sty the efficacy of disinfectants in descending order were chlorine dioxide (1.77x108 ±1.10), sodium hypochlorite (2.57x1011±1.15), cow urine based disinfectant (1.68x1011±1.12) and calcium hypochlorite (7.73x1011±1.06) in all the seasons of the year. In farrowing pen the order of efficacy of disinfectants were chlorine dioxide (1.82x108±1.17), sodium hypochlorite (2.71x1011±1.15), calcium hypochlorite (2.66x1011±1.17) and cow urine based disinfectant (3.15x1011 ±1.07) in all the seasons of the year. Hence, spraying with chlorine dioxide in pig facilities was found to be effective in all seasons of the year. |
doi_str_mv | 10.31018/jans.vi.2248 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2681076509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2681076509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c136t-8ec413500dede228d574bcde70631186b45f28ac8f6ef434c5f8ffe540f2c2113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGqX7gNunXrzmJnMUoovKLjRdUgzNzV1mhmTtNp_79S6unD4OOfyEXLNYC4YMHW3MSHN937OuVRnZMK5YEXJoTknE2hqWTSSsUsyS2kDALypJHCYkN2i3w4mmuz3SNE5b4090N5Rh9-09ckHhzabkBM1a-NDynRlbMboTUe73rTUBzr4NXXG-s5njyOYaTfWpdzbzzGPW2rHkQ5_buniA0Mw_opcONMlnP3fKXl_fHhbPBfL16eXxf2ysExUuVBoJRMlQIstcq7aspYr22INlWBMVStZOq6MVa5CJ4W0pVPOYSnBccsZE1Nyc-odYv-1Gz_Sm34XwzipeaUY1FUJzUgVJ8rGPqWITg_Rb008aAb6T64-ytV7r49yxS9w1W-m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2681076509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative efficacy of few disinfectants against bacterial load in pig facilities at livestock farm complex, Chennai</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Divyalakshmi, D. ; Kumaravelu, N. ; Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B. ; Thamil Vanan, Thanga ; Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Divyalakshmi, D. ; Kumaravelu, N. ; Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B. ; Thamil Vanan, Thanga ; Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Disinfection of animal shed means making them free from disease producing organisms. An attempt has been made to assess the efficacy of disinfectants. The study was carried out in three different seasons of the year during 2017-18 in pig fattener facilities and farrowing pen at Livestock Farm Complex, Madhavaram, Chennai. Four disinfectants namely, chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite and cow urine based disinfectant were used. The efficacy of the disinfectants was found out by dilution method. In pig fattener sty the efficacy of disinfectants in descending order were chlorine dioxide (1.77x108 ±1.10), sodium hypochlorite (2.57x1011±1.15), cow urine based disinfectant (1.68x1011±1.12) and calcium hypochlorite (7.73x1011±1.06) in all the seasons of the year. In farrowing pen the order of efficacy of disinfectants were chlorine dioxide (1.82x108±1.17), sodium hypochlorite (2.71x1011±1.15), calcium hypochlorite (2.66x1011±1.17) and cow urine based disinfectant (3.15x1011 ±1.07) in all the seasons of the year. Hence, spraying with chlorine dioxide in pig facilities was found to be effective in all seasons of the year.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-9411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2231-5209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31018/jans.vi.2248</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Haridwar: Applied and Natural Science Foundation</publisher><subject>Antiseptics ; Calcium ; Calcium hypochlorite ; Chlorine ; Chlorine dioxide ; Dilution ; Disinfectants ; Disinfection ; Disinfection & disinfectants ; Intensive farming ; Livestock ; Livestock farming ; Odors ; Seasons ; Sodium ; Sodium hypochlorite ; Spraying ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied and natural science, 2020, Vol.12 (2), p.79-83</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c136t-8ec413500dede228d574bcde70631186b45f28ac8f6ef434c5f8ffe540f2c2113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2681076509?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,4010,25734,27904,27905,27906,36993,44571</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Divyalakshmi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaravelu, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thamil Vanan, Thanga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative efficacy of few disinfectants against bacterial load in pig facilities at livestock farm complex, Chennai</title><title>Journal of applied and natural science</title><description>Disinfection of animal shed means making them free from disease producing organisms. An attempt has been made to assess the efficacy of disinfectants. The study was carried out in three different seasons of the year during 2017-18 in pig fattener facilities and farrowing pen at Livestock Farm Complex, Madhavaram, Chennai. Four disinfectants namely, chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite and cow urine based disinfectant were used. The efficacy of the disinfectants was found out by dilution method. In pig fattener sty the efficacy of disinfectants in descending order were chlorine dioxide (1.77x108 ±1.10), sodium hypochlorite (2.57x1011±1.15), cow urine based disinfectant (1.68x1011±1.12) and calcium hypochlorite (7.73x1011±1.06) in all the seasons of the year. In farrowing pen the order of efficacy of disinfectants were chlorine dioxide (1.82x108±1.17), sodium hypochlorite (2.71x1011±1.15), calcium hypochlorite (2.66x1011±1.17) and cow urine based disinfectant (3.15x1011 ±1.07) in all the seasons of the year. Hence, spraying with chlorine dioxide in pig facilities was found to be effective in all seasons of the year.</description><subject>Antiseptics</subject><subject>Calcium</subject><subject>Calcium hypochlorite</subject><subject>Chlorine</subject><subject>Chlorine dioxide</subject><subject>Dilution</subject><subject>Disinfectants</subject><subject>Disinfection</subject><subject>Disinfection & disinfectants</subject><subject>Intensive farming</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock farming</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium hypochlorite</subject><subject>Spraying</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0974-9411</issn><issn>2231-5209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEtLAzEUhYMoWGqX7gNunXrzmJnMUoovKLjRdUgzNzV1mhmTtNp_79S6unD4OOfyEXLNYC4YMHW3MSHN937OuVRnZMK5YEXJoTknE2hqWTSSsUsyS2kDALypJHCYkN2i3w4mmuz3SNE5b4090N5Rh9-09ckHhzabkBM1a-NDynRlbMboTUe73rTUBzr4NXXG-s5njyOYaTfWpdzbzzGPW2rHkQ5_buniA0Mw_opcONMlnP3fKXl_fHhbPBfL16eXxf2ysExUuVBoJRMlQIstcq7aspYr22INlWBMVStZOq6MVa5CJ4W0pVPOYSnBccsZE1Nyc-odYv-1Gz_Sm34XwzipeaUY1FUJzUgVJ8rGPqWITg_Rb008aAb6T64-ytV7r49yxS9w1W-m</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Divyalakshmi, D.</creator><creator>Kumaravelu, N.</creator><creator>Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B.</creator><creator>Thamil Vanan, Thanga</creator><creator>Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.</creator><general>Applied and Natural Science Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Comparative efficacy of few disinfectants against bacterial load in pig facilities at livestock farm complex, Chennai</title><author>Divyalakshmi, D. ; Kumaravelu, N. ; Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B. ; Thamil Vanan, Thanga ; Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c136t-8ec413500dede228d574bcde70631186b45f28ac8f6ef434c5f8ffe540f2c2113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Antiseptics</topic><topic>Calcium</topic><topic>Calcium hypochlorite</topic><topic>Chlorine</topic><topic>Chlorine dioxide</topic><topic>Dilution</topic><topic>Disinfectants</topic><topic>Disinfection</topic><topic>Disinfection & disinfectants</topic><topic>Intensive farming</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock farming</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium hypochlorite</topic><topic>Spraying</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Divyalakshmi, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumaravelu, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thamil Vanan, Thanga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied and natural science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Divyalakshmi, D.</au><au>Kumaravelu, N.</au><au>Samuel Masilamoni Ronald, B.</au><au>Thamil Vanan, Thanga</au><au>Tensingh Gnanaraj, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative efficacy of few disinfectants against bacterial load in pig facilities at livestock farm complex, Chennai</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied and natural science</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>83</epage><pages>79-83</pages><issn>0974-9411</issn><eissn>2231-5209</eissn><abstract>Disinfection of animal shed means making them free from disease producing organisms. An attempt has been made to assess the efficacy of disinfectants. The study was carried out in three different seasons of the year during 2017-18 in pig fattener facilities and farrowing pen at Livestock Farm Complex, Madhavaram, Chennai. Four disinfectants namely, chlorine dioxide, sodium hypochlorite, calcium hypochlorite and cow urine based disinfectant were used. The efficacy of the disinfectants was found out by dilution method. In pig fattener sty the efficacy of disinfectants in descending order were chlorine dioxide (1.77x108 ±1.10), sodium hypochlorite (2.57x1011±1.15), cow urine based disinfectant (1.68x1011±1.12) and calcium hypochlorite (7.73x1011±1.06) in all the seasons of the year. In farrowing pen the order of efficacy of disinfectants were chlorine dioxide (1.82x108±1.17), sodium hypochlorite (2.71x1011±1.15), calcium hypochlorite (2.66x1011±1.17) and cow urine based disinfectant (3.15x1011 ±1.07) in all the seasons of the year. Hence, spraying with chlorine dioxide in pig facilities was found to be effective in all seasons of the year.</abstract><cop>Haridwar</cop><pub>Applied and Natural Science Foundation</pub><doi>10.31018/jans.vi.2248</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0974-9411 |
ispartof | Journal of applied and natural science, 2020, Vol.12 (2), p.79-83 |
issn | 0974-9411 2231-5209 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2681076509 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Antiseptics Calcium Calcium hypochlorite Chlorine Chlorine dioxide Dilution Disinfectants Disinfection Disinfection & disinfectants Intensive farming Livestock Livestock farming Odors Seasons Sodium Sodium hypochlorite Spraying Urine |
title | Comparative efficacy of few disinfectants against bacterial load in pig facilities at livestock farm complex, Chennai |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T12%3A14%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20efficacy%20of%20few%20disinfectants%20against%20bacterial%20load%20in%20pig%20facilities%20at%20livestock%20farm%20complex,%20Chennai&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20and%20natural%20science&rft.au=Divyalakshmi,%20D.&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=83&rft.pages=79-83&rft.issn=0974-9411&rft.eissn=2231-5209&rft_id=info:doi/10.31018/jans.vi.2248&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2681076509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c136t-8ec413500dede228d574bcde70631186b45f28ac8f6ef434c5f8ffe540f2c2113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2681076509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |