Loading…

Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments

Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of supply chain management 2022-07, Vol.58 (3), p.3-22
Main Authors: Paraskevas, John‐Patrick, Eckerd, Stephanie, Grimm, Curtis M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293
container_end_page 22
container_issue 3
container_start_page 3
container_title The journal of supply chain management
container_volume 58
creator Paraskevas, John‐Patrick
Eckerd, Stephanie
Grimm, Curtis M.
description Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jscm.12273
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2689464162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2689464162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0LXfDVtvC3rNyseVPAW2iR1s7RNTdKV_fe21rNzmWHmed-BF4BzjBZ4qKttUM0CE5LRAzDDGUsTJujH4TCnhCaEIXEMTkLYIoTyjKIZUDfe7mz7CZVznfFFtDsDCxWta8M1XMKmr6NtTNw4DUPs9R66CsaNgdE0nfNFDXU_qlw7HvrW1kU041q5prGxMW0Mp-CoKupgzv76HLzf3b6tHpL1y_3jarlOFE1zmrCSk8ygVCFWGE5TUVVFSTWnVKOSC1yqssx5KrRi2GgkSkZJrgVnFS2rlAg6BxeTb-fdV29ClFvX-3Z4KQnPBeMMczJQlxOlvAvBm0p23jaF30uM5BiiHEOUvyEOMJ7gb1ub_T-kfHpdPU-aH2tkdi4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689464162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick ; Eckerd, Stephanie ; Grimm, Curtis M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick ; Eckerd, Stephanie ; Grimm, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wheat Ridge: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>behavioral supply management ; buyer–supplier relationships ; Cooperation ; multimethod study ; Operations management ; reciprocity ; Supply chain management ; unilateral commitments</subject><ispartof>The journal of supply chain management, 2022-07, Vol.58 (3), p.3-22</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9996-4752 ; 0000-0003-0804-0368</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerd, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><title>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</title><title>The journal of supply chain management</title><description>Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments.</description><subject>behavioral supply management</subject><subject>buyer–supplier relationships</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>multimethod study</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>reciprocity</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>unilateral commitments</subject><issn>1523-2409</issn><issn>1745-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0LXfDVtvC3rNyseVPAW2iR1s7RNTdKV_fe21rNzmWHmed-BF4BzjBZ4qKttUM0CE5LRAzDDGUsTJujH4TCnhCaEIXEMTkLYIoTyjKIZUDfe7mz7CZVznfFFtDsDCxWta8M1XMKmr6NtTNw4DUPs9R66CsaNgdE0nfNFDXU_qlw7HvrW1kU041q5prGxMW0Mp-CoKupgzv76HLzf3b6tHpL1y_3jarlOFE1zmrCSk8ygVCFWGE5TUVVFSTWnVKOSC1yqssx5KrRi2GgkSkZJrgVnFS2rlAg6BxeTb-fdV29ClFvX-3Z4KQnPBeMMczJQlxOlvAvBm0p23jaF30uM5BiiHEOUvyEOMJ7gb1ub_T-kfHpdPU-aH2tkdi4</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</creator><creator>Eckerd, Stephanie</creator><creator>Grimm, Curtis M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-4752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-0368</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</title><author>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick ; Eckerd, Stephanie ; Grimm, Curtis M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>behavioral supply management</topic><topic>buyer–supplier relationships</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>multimethod study</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>reciprocity</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>unilateral commitments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerd, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of supply chain management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</au><au>Eckerd, Stephanie</au><au>Grimm, Curtis M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</atitle><jtitle>The journal of supply chain management</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>3-22</pages><issn>1523-2409</issn><eissn>1745-493X</eissn><abstract>Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments.</abstract><cop>Wheat Ridge</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jscm.12273</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-4752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-0368</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-2409
ispartof The journal of supply chain management, 2022-07, Vol.58 (3), p.3-22
issn 1523-2409
1745-493X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2689464162
source Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects behavioral supply management
buyer–supplier relationships
Cooperation
multimethod study
Operations management
reciprocity
Supply chain management
unilateral commitments
title Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A47%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Driving%20cooperative%20actions:%20A%20multimethod%20study%20of%20the%20temporal%20duration%20of%20unilateral%20commitments&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20supply%20chain%20management&rft.au=Paraskevas,%20John%E2%80%90Patrick&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=3-22&rft.issn=1523-2409&rft.eissn=1745-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jscm.12273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689464162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689464162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true