Loading…
Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments
Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of supply chain management 2022-07, Vol.58 (3), p.3-22 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293 |
container_end_page | 22 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | The journal of supply chain management |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Paraskevas, John‐Patrick Eckerd, Stephanie Grimm, Curtis M. |
description | Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jscm.12273 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2689464162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2689464162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0LXfDVtvC3rNyseVPAW2iR1s7RNTdKV_fe21rNzmWHmed-BF4BzjBZ4qKttUM0CE5LRAzDDGUsTJujH4TCnhCaEIXEMTkLYIoTyjKIZUDfe7mz7CZVznfFFtDsDCxWta8M1XMKmr6NtTNw4DUPs9R66CsaNgdE0nfNFDXU_qlw7HvrW1kU041q5prGxMW0Mp-CoKupgzv76HLzf3b6tHpL1y_3jarlOFE1zmrCSk8ygVCFWGE5TUVVFSTWnVKOSC1yqssx5KrRi2GgkSkZJrgVnFS2rlAg6BxeTb-fdV29ClFvX-3Z4KQnPBeMMczJQlxOlvAvBm0p23jaF30uM5BiiHEOUvyEOMJ7gb1ub_T-kfHpdPU-aH2tkdi4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2689464162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</title><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick ; Eckerd, Stephanie ; Grimm, Curtis M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick ; Eckerd, Stephanie ; Grimm, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-2409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-493X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jscm.12273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wheat Ridge: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>behavioral supply management ; buyer–supplier relationships ; Cooperation ; multimethod study ; Operations management ; reciprocity ; Supply chain management ; unilateral commitments</subject><ispartof>The journal of supply chain management, 2022-07, Vol.58 (3), p.3-22</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2022 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9996-4752 ; 0000-0003-0804-0368</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerd, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><title>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</title><title>The journal of supply chain management</title><description>Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments.</description><subject>behavioral supply management</subject><subject>buyer–supplier relationships</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>multimethod study</subject><subject>Operations management</subject><subject>reciprocity</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><subject>unilateral commitments</subject><issn>1523-2409</issn><issn>1745-493X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AUBb0LXfDVtvC3rNyseVPAW2iR1s7RNTdKV_fe21rNzmWHmed-BF4BzjBZ4qKttUM0CE5LRAzDDGUsTJujH4TCnhCaEIXEMTkLYIoTyjKIZUDfe7mz7CZVznfFFtDsDCxWta8M1XMKmr6NtTNw4DUPs9R66CsaNgdE0nfNFDXU_qlw7HvrW1kU041q5prGxMW0Mp-CoKupgzv76HLzf3b6tHpL1y_3jarlOFE1zmrCSk8ygVCFWGE5TUVVFSTWnVKOSC1yqssx5KrRi2GgkSkZJrgVnFS2rlAg6BxeTb-fdV29ClFvX-3Z4KQnPBeMMczJQlxOlvAvBm0p23jaF30uM5BiiHEOUvyEOMJ7gb1ub_T-kfHpdPU-aH2tkdi4</recordid><startdate>202207</startdate><enddate>202207</enddate><creator>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</creator><creator>Eckerd, Stephanie</creator><creator>Grimm, Curtis M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-4752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-0368</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202207</creationdate><title>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</title><author>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick ; Eckerd, Stephanie ; Grimm, Curtis M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>behavioral supply management</topic><topic>buyer–supplier relationships</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>multimethod study</topic><topic>Operations management</topic><topic>reciprocity</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><topic>unilateral commitments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckerd, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grimm, Curtis M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of supply chain management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paraskevas, John‐Patrick</au><au>Eckerd, Stephanie</au><au>Grimm, Curtis M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments</atitle><jtitle>The journal of supply chain management</jtitle><date>2022-07</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>3-22</pages><issn>1523-2409</issn><eissn>1745-493X</eissn><abstract>Previous research demonstrates numerous benefits of mutual commitments between parties. However, less is understood about the effect of unilateral commitments, when one party (the committer) makes a relationship‐specific investment without an established current or forthcoming reciprocal commitment by the other party (the recipient). This problem is particularly relevant in the supply chain management domain, where organizations often make investments in their supply chain partners, and frequently assume great risks in doing so. To help organizations understand how they can initiate unilateral commitments to their benefit, we develop theory regarding the outcomes of unilateral commitments based on their temporal duration. We evaluate our hypothesis using data collected from three distinct studies, each using different methodologies and samples: a laboratory experiment of graduate students, a vignette experiment of operations management practitioners, and a secondary data analysis of baseball contracts. We find compelling support that unilateral commitments of shorter duration successfully drive recipient cooperative behavior; however, a significant decrease in recipient cooperation results from longer term unilateral commitments. Our research contributes broadly to the literature on unilateral commitments, and in particular its manifestation within supply chain management, where this research stands to make substantial impact due to the prevalence of unilateral commitments.</abstract><cop>Wheat Ridge</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jscm.12273</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9996-4752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0804-0368</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-2409 |
ispartof | The journal of supply chain management, 2022-07, Vol.58 (3), p.3-22 |
issn | 1523-2409 1745-493X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2689464162 |
source | Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | behavioral supply management buyer–supplier relationships Cooperation multimethod study Operations management reciprocity Supply chain management unilateral commitments |
title | Driving cooperative actions: A multimethod study of the temporal duration of unilateral commitments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A47%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Driving%20cooperative%20actions:%20A%20multimethod%20study%20of%20the%20temporal%20duration%20of%20unilateral%20commitments&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20supply%20chain%20management&rft.au=Paraskevas,%20John%E2%80%90Patrick&rft.date=2022-07&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=3-22&rft.issn=1523-2409&rft.eissn=1745-493X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jscm.12273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2689464162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-4b627e05c04ae6359ffab3d633d0b691bcbb8659dc41ed09b4328d964f3bf5293%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2689464162&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |