Loading…

Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas

Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of phytoremediation 2022, Vol.24 (8), p.787-795
Main Authors: Das, Madhumita, Bramhanand, P. S., Laxminarayana, K., Roy Chowdhury, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853
container_end_page 795
container_issue 8
container_start_page 787
container_title International journal of phytoremediation
container_volume 24
creator Das, Madhumita
Bramhanand, P. S.
Laxminarayana, K.
Roy Chowdhury, S.
description Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI). Novelty statement Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2691115769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2691115769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v3CAQhlGVqvlof0IrpJy9ZTBjzK3RKm0jReqlPSPMQpfIhi14k-y_L9ZucsxpZqRnZvQ-hHwGtgLWs6-AnHcIYsUZhxUoiZ2Ad-QCUKhG9lKdLT3nzQKdk8tSHhgDKTr4QM5bgShYCxdkvPXe2Tk8uuhKoclTm6YpRToZm9Nue5hdoT5lurQpu8ltgplDBSq6dc_m0YwuznRdiexOQ4jUbnOawuzoFGKIf6nJzpSP5L03Y3GfTvWK_Pl--3v9s7n_9eNufXPf2FaJuZHGGyd7QON7JdA7ZQfJ0HPfI5oBbLvxKLp-UJ1kTNWw3CK2OPSetazH9opcH-_ucvq3d2XWD2mfY32peacAAGWnKoVHqgYtJTuvdzlMJh80ML041i-O9eJYnxzXvS-n6_uh6njdepFagW9HIMRqbjJPKY8bPZvDmLLPJtpQdPv2j_-djYxB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691115769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Das, Madhumita ; Bramhanand, P. S. ; Laxminarayana, K. ; Roy Chowdhury, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Madhumita ; Bramhanand, P. S. ; Laxminarayana, K. ; Roy Chowdhury, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI). Novelty statement Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-6514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-7879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34554031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Araceae ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biomass ; Carcinogens ; Chromite ; chromite mining areas ; Chromium ; Common macrophytes ; Experimentation ; Floating plants ; Hexavalent chromium ; Macrophytes ; Metal concentrations ; Metals ; Minima ; Mining ; Phytoremediation ; Pistia stratiotes ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>International journal of phytoremediation, 2022, Vol.24 (8), p.787-795</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2021</rights><rights>2021 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Madhumita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramhanand, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laxminarayana, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy Chowdhury, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</title><title>International journal of phytoremediation</title><addtitle>Int J Phytoremediation</addtitle><description>Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI). Novelty statement Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Araceae</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Chromite</subject><subject>chromite mining areas</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Common macrophytes</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Floating plants</subject><subject>Hexavalent chromium</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Minima</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Phytoremediation</subject><subject>Pistia stratiotes</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>1522-6514</issn><issn>1549-7879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v3CAQhlGVqvlof0IrpJy9ZTBjzK3RKm0jReqlPSPMQpfIhi14k-y_L9ZucsxpZqRnZvQ-hHwGtgLWs6-AnHcIYsUZhxUoiZ2Ad-QCUKhG9lKdLT3nzQKdk8tSHhgDKTr4QM5bgShYCxdkvPXe2Tk8uuhKoclTm6YpRToZm9Nue5hdoT5lurQpu8ltgplDBSq6dc_m0YwuznRdiexOQ4jUbnOawuzoFGKIf6nJzpSP5L03Y3GfTvWK_Pl--3v9s7n_9eNufXPf2FaJuZHGGyd7QON7JdA7ZQfJ0HPfI5oBbLvxKLp-UJ1kTNWw3CK2OPSetazH9opcH-_ucvq3d2XWD2mfY32peacAAGWnKoVHqgYtJTuvdzlMJh80ML041i-O9eJYnxzXvS-n6_uh6njdepFagW9HIMRqbjJPKY8bPZvDmLLPJtpQdPv2j_-djYxB</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Das, Madhumita</creator><creator>Bramhanand, P. S.</creator><creator>Laxminarayana, K.</creator><creator>Roy Chowdhury, S.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</title><author>Das, Madhumita ; Bramhanand, P. S. ; Laxminarayana, K. ; Roy Chowdhury, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Araceae</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Chromite</topic><topic>chromite mining areas</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Common macrophytes</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Floating plants</topic><topic>Hexavalent chromium</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Minima</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Phytoremediation</topic><topic>Pistia stratiotes</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Madhumita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramhanand, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laxminarayana, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy Chowdhury, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of phytoremediation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Madhumita</au><au>Bramhanand, P. S.</au><au>Laxminarayana, K.</au><au>Roy Chowdhury, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</atitle><jtitle>International journal of phytoremediation</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Phytoremediation</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>795</epage><pages>787-795</pages><issn>1522-6514</issn><eissn>1549-7879</eissn><abstract>Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI). Novelty statement Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>34554031</pmid><doi>10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-6514
ispartof International journal of phytoremediation, 2022, Vol.24 (8), p.787-795
issn 1522-6514
1549-7879
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2691115769
source Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection
subjects Aquatic plants
Araceae
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biomass
Carcinogens
Chromite
chromite mining areas
Chromium
Common macrophytes
Experimentation
Floating plants
Hexavalent chromium
Macrophytes
Metal concentrations
Metals
Minima
Mining
Phytoremediation
Pistia stratiotes
Toxicity
title Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20common%20macrophytes%20for%20phytoremediation%20of%20hexavalent%20Cr%20prevalent%20in%20chromite%20mining%20areas&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20phytoremediation&rft.au=Das,%20Madhumita&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=795&rft.pages=787-795&rft.issn=1522-6514&rft.eissn=1549-7879&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2691115769%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691115769&rft_id=info:pmid/34554031&rfr_iscdi=true