Loading…
Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas
Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 an...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of phytoremediation 2022, Vol.24 (8), p.787-795 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853 |
container_end_page | 795 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 787 |
container_title | International journal of phytoremediation |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Das, Madhumita Bramhanand, P. S. Laxminarayana, K. Roy Chowdhury, S. |
description | Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI).
Novelty statement
Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2691115769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2691115769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v3CAQhlGVqvlof0IrpJy9ZTBjzK3RKm0jReqlPSPMQpfIhi14k-y_L9ZucsxpZqRnZvQ-hHwGtgLWs6-AnHcIYsUZhxUoiZ2Ad-QCUKhG9lKdLT3nzQKdk8tSHhgDKTr4QM5bgShYCxdkvPXe2Tk8uuhKoclTm6YpRToZm9Nue5hdoT5lurQpu8ltgplDBSq6dc_m0YwuznRdiexOQ4jUbnOawuzoFGKIf6nJzpSP5L03Y3GfTvWK_Pl--3v9s7n_9eNufXPf2FaJuZHGGyd7QON7JdA7ZQfJ0HPfI5oBbLvxKLp-UJ1kTNWw3CK2OPSetazH9opcH-_ucvq3d2XWD2mfY32peacAAGWnKoVHqgYtJTuvdzlMJh80ML041i-O9eJYnxzXvS-n6_uh6njdepFagW9HIMRqbjJPKY8bPZvDmLLPJtpQdPv2j_-djYxB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691115769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</title><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Das, Madhumita ; Bramhanand, P. S. ; Laxminarayana, K. ; Roy Chowdhury, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Madhumita ; Bramhanand, P. S. ; Laxminarayana, K. ; Roy Chowdhury, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI).
Novelty statement
Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-6514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1549-7879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34554031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Aquatic plants ; Araceae ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biomass ; Carcinogens ; Chromite ; chromite mining areas ; Chromium ; Common macrophytes ; Experimentation ; Floating plants ; Hexavalent chromium ; Macrophytes ; Metal concentrations ; Metals ; Minima ; Mining ; Phytoremediation ; Pistia stratiotes ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>International journal of phytoremediation, 2022, Vol.24 (8), p.787-795</ispartof><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2021</rights><rights>2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34554031$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Madhumita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramhanand, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laxminarayana, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy Chowdhury, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</title><title>International journal of phytoremediation</title><addtitle>Int J Phytoremediation</addtitle><description>Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI).
Novelty statement
Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources.</description><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Araceae</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Chromite</subject><subject>chromite mining areas</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Common macrophytes</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Floating plants</subject><subject>Hexavalent chromium</subject><subject>Macrophytes</subject><subject>Metal concentrations</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Minima</subject><subject>Mining</subject><subject>Phytoremediation</subject><subject>Pistia stratiotes</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>1522-6514</issn><issn>1549-7879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v3CAQhlGVqvlof0IrpJy9ZTBjzK3RKm0jReqlPSPMQpfIhi14k-y_L9ZucsxpZqRnZvQ-hHwGtgLWs6-AnHcIYsUZhxUoiZ2Ad-QCUKhG9lKdLT3nzQKdk8tSHhgDKTr4QM5bgShYCxdkvPXe2Tk8uuhKoclTm6YpRToZm9Nue5hdoT5lurQpu8ltgplDBSq6dc_m0YwuznRdiexOQ4jUbnOawuzoFGKIf6nJzpSP5L03Y3GfTvWK_Pl--3v9s7n_9eNufXPf2FaJuZHGGyd7QON7JdA7ZQfJ0HPfI5oBbLvxKLp-UJ1kTNWw3CK2OPSetazH9opcH-_ucvq3d2XWD2mfY32peacAAGWnKoVHqgYtJTuvdzlMJh80ML041i-O9eJYnxzXvS-n6_uh6njdepFagW9HIMRqbjJPKY8bPZvDmLLPJtpQdPv2j_-djYxB</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Das, Madhumita</creator><creator>Bramhanand, P. S.</creator><creator>Laxminarayana, K.</creator><creator>Roy Chowdhury, S.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</title><author>Das, Madhumita ; Bramhanand, P. S. ; Laxminarayana, K. ; Roy Chowdhury, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Araceae</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Chromite</topic><topic>chromite mining areas</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Common macrophytes</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Floating plants</topic><topic>Hexavalent chromium</topic><topic>Macrophytes</topic><topic>Metal concentrations</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Minima</topic><topic>Mining</topic><topic>Phytoremediation</topic><topic>Pistia stratiotes</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Madhumita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bramhanand, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laxminarayana, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy Chowdhury, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of phytoremediation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Madhumita</au><au>Bramhanand, P. S.</au><au>Laxminarayana, K.</au><au>Roy Chowdhury, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas</atitle><jtitle>International journal of phytoremediation</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Phytoremediation</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>787</spage><epage>795</epage><pages>787-795</pages><issn>1522-6514</issn><eissn>1549-7879</eissn><abstract>Hexavalent chromium Cr(VI) is carcinogenic. To reduce Cr(VI) toxicity, a study was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of common macrophytes in the range of Cr concentration prevalent in chromite mining areas at Sukinda, Odisha, India. The metal varied from 0.09 to 2.14 mg/L during 2016 − 2019 and indicated that ≅70% waterbodies are contaminated with Cr(VI). Phytoremediation experimentation using five common macrophytes resulted in Pistia stratiotes, Salvinia minima and Ipomoea aquatica as suitable species by remediating 57 to 100% Cr(VI) from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/L within 54 days. S. minima had then found to remove 1 to 1.8 and 1.6 to 2.8 times more Cr (total) than P. stratiotes and I. aquatica respectively from a level of 0.5 to 2.5 mg/L Cr(VI) within 49 days. Irrespective of plant-duration, P. stratiotes excelled over S. minima by 59 to 68% and I. aquatica by 55 to 89% in BCF value. S. minima thus proved best by removing maximum Cr per unit time while the combination of S. minima and P. stratiotes would have promise in respect of generating low volume of remediated biomass in phytoremediation of Cr(VI).
Novelty statement
Macrophytes differ in their response to remove metal, screening against a given metal concentration suggests the suitable species and testing signifies their effectiveness of remediating metal from contaminated sources.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>34554031</pmid><doi>10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-6514 |
ispartof | International journal of phytoremediation, 2022, Vol.24 (8), p.787-795 |
issn | 1522-6514 1549-7879 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2691115769 |
source | Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Aquatic plants Araceae Biodegradation, Environmental Biomass Carcinogens Chromite chromite mining areas Chromium Common macrophytes Experimentation Floating plants Hexavalent chromium Macrophytes Metal concentrations Metals Minima Mining Phytoremediation Pistia stratiotes Toxicity |
title | Effectiveness of common macrophytes for phytoremediation of hexavalent Cr prevalent in chromite mining areas |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A55%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20common%20macrophytes%20for%20phytoremediation%20of%20hexavalent%20Cr%20prevalent%20in%20chromite%20mining%20areas&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20phytoremediation&rft.au=Das,%20Madhumita&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=787&rft.epage=795&rft.pages=787-795&rft.issn=1522-6514&rft.eissn=1549-7879&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15226514.2021.1975641&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2691115769%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-7afae7815af8945fe9cb705f2f855ab1c3df5468b9670097872c5535b8f030853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691115769&rft_id=info:pmid/34554031&rfr_iscdi=true |