Loading…

Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage

This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of international trade & economic development 2022-07, Vol.31 (5), p.725-741
Main Authors: Yang, Lei, Dong, Qianli, Tong, Ziqiang, Wang, Qiuling, Wu, Jiani
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583
container_end_page 741
container_issue 5
container_start_page 725
container_title The journal of international trade & economic development
container_volume 31
creator Yang, Lei
Dong, Qianli
Tong, Ziqiang
Wang, Qiuling
Wu, Jiani
description This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2691146170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2691146170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhw69SbZB7JTim2CgU3ug5pHiVlmoxJWum_d4bWrZtzufCdc7kHoXsMMwwMnoA3lGHOZwQIHgRjyuACTXDV8JLXNb9Ek5EpR-ga3aS0BYCqApig5SpsXMpOpcL5fp8HzcYnl4-PRY5Sm8JK5TqXZXbBF9LrQoVdL-OwH0wh9UH6LDfmFl1Z2SVzd55T9LV4_Zy_lauP5fv8ZVUqyptctkC41rVi6zXTiijGa9oqoJhSy7DGrTTaGrCgpCbGQF01BhPNCG9AtTWjU_Rwyu1j-N6blMU27KMfTgrScDy8jFsYqPpEqRhSisaKPrqdjEeBQYydib_OxNiZOHc2-J5PPudtiDv5E2KnRZbHLkQbpVcuCfp_xC8VJnNM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691146170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Yang, Lei ; Dong, Qianli ; Tong, Ziqiang ; Wang, Qiuling ; Wu, Jiani</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lei ; Dong, Qianli ; Tong, Ziqiang ; Wang, Qiuling ; Wu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Advantages ; comparative advantage ; Comparative studies ; Developing countries ; LDCs ; logistics input intensity ; logistics performance index ; Manufacturing ; Policy making ; Trade facilitation</subject><ispartof>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development, 2022-07, Vol.31 (5), p.725-741</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2762-0114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901,33199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Qianli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Ziqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><title>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</title><title>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development</title><description>This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>comparative advantage</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>logistics input intensity</subject><subject>logistics performance index</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Trade facilitation</subject><issn>0963-8199</issn><issn>1469-9559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhw69SbZB7JTim2CgU3ug5pHiVlmoxJWum_d4bWrZtzufCdc7kHoXsMMwwMnoA3lGHOZwQIHgRjyuACTXDV8JLXNb9Ek5EpR-ga3aS0BYCqApig5SpsXMpOpcL5fp8HzcYnl4-PRY5Sm8JK5TqXZXbBF9LrQoVdL-OwH0wh9UH6LDfmFl1Z2SVzd55T9LV4_Zy_lauP5fv8ZVUqyptctkC41rVi6zXTiijGa9oqoJhSy7DGrTTaGrCgpCbGQF01BhPNCG9AtTWjU_Rwyu1j-N6blMU27KMfTgrScDy8jFsYqPpEqRhSisaKPrqdjEeBQYydib_OxNiZOHc2-J5PPudtiDv5E2KnRZbHLkQbpVcuCfp_xC8VJnNM</recordid><startdate>20220704</startdate><enddate>20220704</enddate><creator>Yang, Lei</creator><creator>Dong, Qianli</creator><creator>Tong, Ziqiang</creator><creator>Wang, Qiuling</creator><creator>Wu, Jiani</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-0114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220704</creationdate><title>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</title><author>Yang, Lei ; Dong, Qianli ; Tong, Ziqiang ; Wang, Qiuling ; Wu, Jiani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>comparative advantage</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>logistics input intensity</topic><topic>logistics performance index</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Trade facilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Qianli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Ziqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Lei</au><au>Dong, Qianli</au><au>Tong, Ziqiang</au><au>Wang, Qiuling</au><au>Wu, Jiani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</atitle><jtitle>The journal of international trade &amp; economic development</jtitle><date>2022-07-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>741</epage><pages>725-741</pages><issn>0963-8199</issn><eissn>1469-9559</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-0114</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0963-8199
ispartof The journal of international trade & economic development, 2022-07, Vol.31 (5), p.725-741
issn 0963-8199
1469-9559
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2691146170
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Advantages
comparative advantage
Comparative studies
Developing countries
LDCs
logistics input intensity
logistics performance index
Manufacturing
Policy making
Trade facilitation
title Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T10%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Logistics%20input%20intensity,%20trade%20facilitation%20and%20comparative%20advantage&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20international%20trade%20&%20economic%20development&rft.au=Yang,%20Lei&rft.date=2022-07-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=741&rft.pages=725-741&rft.issn=0963-8199&rft.eissn=1469-9559&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2691146170%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691146170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true