Loading…
Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage
This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sect...
Saved in:
Published in: | The journal of international trade & economic development 2022-07, Vol.31 (5), p.725-741 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583 |
container_end_page | 741 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 725 |
container_title | The journal of international trade & economic development |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Yang, Lei Dong, Qianli Tong, Ziqiang Wang, Qiuling Wu, Jiani |
description | This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2691146170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2691146170</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhw69SbZB7JTim2CgU3ug5pHiVlmoxJWum_d4bWrZtzufCdc7kHoXsMMwwMnoA3lGHOZwQIHgRjyuACTXDV8JLXNb9Ek5EpR-ga3aS0BYCqApig5SpsXMpOpcL5fp8HzcYnl4-PRY5Sm8JK5TqXZXbBF9LrQoVdL-OwH0wh9UH6LDfmFl1Z2SVzd55T9LV4_Zy_lauP5fv8ZVUqyptctkC41rVi6zXTiijGa9oqoJhSy7DGrTTaGrCgpCbGQF01BhPNCG9AtTWjU_Rwyu1j-N6blMU27KMfTgrScDy8jFsYqPpEqRhSisaKPrqdjEeBQYydib_OxNiZOHc2-J5PPudtiDv5E2KnRZbHLkQbpVcuCfp_xC8VJnNM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2691146170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Yang, Lei ; Dong, Qianli ; Tong, Ziqiang ; Wang, Qiuling ; Wu, Jiani</creator><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lei ; Dong, Qianli ; Tong, Ziqiang ; Wang, Qiuling ; Wu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><description>This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0963-8199</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-9559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>Advantages ; comparative advantage ; Comparative studies ; Developing countries ; LDCs ; logistics input intensity ; logistics performance index ; Manufacturing ; Policy making ; Trade facilitation</subject><ispartof>The journal of international trade & economic development, 2022-07, Vol.31 (5), p.725-741</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2762-0114</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27900,27901,33199</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Qianli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Ziqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><title>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</title><title>The journal of international trade & economic development</title><description>This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>comparative advantage</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>logistics input intensity</subject><subject>logistics performance index</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Trade facilitation</subject><issn>0963-8199</issn><issn>1469-9559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_QRhw69SbZB7JTim2CgU3ug5pHiVlmoxJWum_d4bWrZtzufCdc7kHoXsMMwwMnoA3lGHOZwQIHgRjyuACTXDV8JLXNb9Ek5EpR-ga3aS0BYCqApig5SpsXMpOpcL5fp8HzcYnl4-PRY5Sm8JK5TqXZXbBF9LrQoVdL-OwH0wh9UH6LDfmFl1Z2SVzd55T9LV4_Zy_lauP5fv8ZVUqyptctkC41rVi6zXTiijGa9oqoJhSy7DGrTTaGrCgpCbGQF01BhPNCG9AtTWjU_Rwyu1j-N6blMU27KMfTgrScDy8jFsYqPpEqRhSisaKPrqdjEeBQYydib_OxNiZOHc2-J5PPudtiDv5E2KnRZbHLkQbpVcuCfp_xC8VJnNM</recordid><startdate>20220704</startdate><enddate>20220704</enddate><creator>Yang, Lei</creator><creator>Dong, Qianli</creator><creator>Tong, Ziqiang</creator><creator>Wang, Qiuling</creator><creator>Wu, Jiani</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-0114</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220704</creationdate><title>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</title><author>Yang, Lei ; Dong, Qianli ; Tong, Ziqiang ; Wang, Qiuling ; Wu, Jiani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>comparative advantage</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>logistics input intensity</topic><topic>logistics performance index</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Trade facilitation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Qianli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Ziqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qiuling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jiani</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The journal of international trade & economic development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yang, Lei</au><au>Dong, Qianli</au><au>Tong, Ziqiang</au><au>Wang, Qiuling</au><au>Wu, Jiani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage</atitle><jtitle>The journal of international trade & economic development</jtitle><date>2022-07-04</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>741</epage><pages>725-741</pages><issn>0963-8199</issn><eissn>1469-9559</eissn><abstract>This paper investigates the impact of trade facilitation on comparative advantage in logistics-intensive manufacturing industries. To capture the industry-level heterogeneity, we introduce logistics input intensity (LII) to measure the degree of logistics service used by different manufacturing sectors. The results show that country-level trade facilitation measured by Logistics Performance Index (LPI) can promote the comparative advantage more in manufacturing sectors with higher usage intensity of logistics, especially in developing countries. Furthermore, after dividing the logistics input intensity into two parts of foreign and domestic, we find that foreign logistics input can enhance manufacturing comparative advantage in countries with low LPI. It is suggested that policymakers in developing countries should formulate specific policies to guide logistics resources toward manufacturing sectors that are more dependent on logistics and open up the logistics services market to take full advantage of foreign logistics services.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2762-0114</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0963-8199 |
ispartof | The journal of international trade & economic development, 2022-07, Vol.31 (5), p.725-741 |
issn | 0963-8199 1469-9559 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2691146170 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate (EBSCOHost); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Advantages comparative advantage Comparative studies Developing countries LDCs logistics input intensity logistics performance index Manufacturing Policy making Trade facilitation |
title | Logistics input intensity, trade facilitation and comparative advantage |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T10%3A07%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Logistics%20input%20intensity,%20trade%20facilitation%20and%20comparative%20advantage&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20international%20trade%20&%20economic%20development&rft.au=Yang,%20Lei&rft.date=2022-07-04&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=741&rft.pages=725-741&rft.issn=0963-8199&rft.eissn=1469-9559&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09638199.2021.2011380&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2691146170%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-7029dd5c8bb8dc2c89537c03133f81d17aedfe0f0cad2ee0546e12d82960c7583%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2691146170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |