PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the FIGO’s novel classification system versus the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out between August 2015 and September 2019 in the Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ginekologia polska 2021-01, Vol.92 (4), p.257-261
Main Authors: Kahveci, Bekir, Budak, Mehmet Sukru, Ege, Serhat, Obut, Mehmet, Baglı, Ihsan, Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil, Vardar, Mehmet Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Age
Body mass index
Classification
Fibroids
Health sciences
Histopathology
Hyperplasia
Hysterectomy
Menstruation
Pathology
Patients
Polyps
Terminology
Womens health
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 261
container_issue 4
container_start_page 257
container_title Ginekologia polska
container_volume 92
creator Kahveci, Bekir
Budak, Mehmet Sukru
Ege, Serhat
Obut, Mehmet
Baglı, Ihsan
Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil
Vardar, Mehmet Ali
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the FIGO’s novel classification system versus the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out between August 2015 and September 2019 in the Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. The pathology reports of the patients were classified according to the PALM-COEIN method and were compared with classical terminology. The operated patients with fibroids reported in the pathology results were classified as subgroups of fibroids. RESULTS: Evaluation was made of a total of 515 women with abnormal uterine bleeding. According to the classical terminology, 137 (26.6%) patients were defined with hypermenorrhea, 74 (14.4%) with menorrhagia, 57 (11.1%) with metrorrhagia, and 246 (47.8%) with menometrorrhagia. In the PALM-COEIN classification system, polyps were determined in 84 (16.3%) cases, adenomyosis in 228 [diffuse adenomyosis: 196 (38.1%), local adenomyosis: 32 (6.2%)], leiomyoma in 386 [submu-cous: 161 (31.1%), other types: 225 (43.9%)], and malignancy and hyperplasia in 47 (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The classical terminology for abnormal uterine bleeding is insufficient in terms of etiological pathologies in non-pregnant women of reproductive age. The widespread use of this novel system for the abnormal uterine bleeding classification will provide a more useful communication between physicians and researchers.
doi_str_mv 10.5603/GP.a2021.0011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2692730725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2692730725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c9cd6859656c7f8acba035de2d001daade1dc70c65055360dc3b5ab66d596bfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEFvAiEQhUnTJjXWY-8kPa9loYB7NEa3JrZ6aM-EBVYxu2AB2_jvxepcJnn53kzeA-C5RGPKEHmtN2OJES7HCJXlHRhg-kYKxhm_B4Ms8eKiP4JRjHuUh2GOq2oA3Ga6-ihm6_nyE6pOxmhbq2Sy3sF4isn00LdwsazX8DfCtDM3SMFkQm-d7_z2BK2Dh-wxLkX4Z9MOysb50MsOHjNmnYFNZ4y2bvsEHlrZRTO67SH4Xsy_Zu_Fal0vZ9NVoUjJUqEqpdmEVowyxduJVI1EhGqDdU6hpdSm1IojxSiilDCkFWmobBjT2dO0hgzBy_XuIfifo4lJ7P0xuPxSYFZhThDHNFPFlVLBxxhMKw7B9jKcRInEpVVRb8R_q-LSHjkDrdJqzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2692730725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Kahveci, Bekir ; Budak, Mehmet Sukru ; Ege, Serhat ; Obut, Mehmet ; Baglı, Ihsan ; Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil ; Vardar, Mehmet Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Kahveci, Bekir ; Budak, Mehmet Sukru ; Ege, Serhat ; Obut, Mehmet ; Baglı, Ihsan ; Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil ; Vardar, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the FIGO’s novel classification system versus the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out between August 2015 and September 2019 in the Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. The pathology reports of the patients were classified according to the PALM-COEIN method and were compared with classical terminology. The operated patients with fibroids reported in the pathology results were classified as subgroups of fibroids. RESULTS: Evaluation was made of a total of 515 women with abnormal uterine bleeding. According to the classical terminology, 137 (26.6%) patients were defined with hypermenorrhea, 74 (14.4%) with menorrhagia, 57 (11.1%) with metrorrhagia, and 246 (47.8%) with menometrorrhagia. In the PALM-COEIN classification system, polyps were determined in 84 (16.3%) cases, adenomyosis in 228 [diffuse adenomyosis: 196 (38.1%), local adenomyosis: 32 (6.2%)], leiomyoma in 386 [submu-cous: 161 (31.1%), other types: 225 (43.9%)], and malignancy and hyperplasia in 47 (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The classical terminology for abnormal uterine bleeding is insufficient in terms of etiological pathologies in non-pregnant women of reproductive age. The widespread use of this novel system for the abnormal uterine bleeding classification will provide a more useful communication between physicians and researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-0011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2543-6767</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2021.0011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Gdansk: Wydawnictwo Via Medica</publisher><subject>Age ; Body mass index ; Classification ; Fibroids ; Health sciences ; Histopathology ; Hyperplasia ; Hysterectomy ; Menstruation ; Pathology ; Patients ; Polyps ; Terminology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Ginekologia polska, 2021-01, Vol.92 (4), p.257-261</ispartof><rights>2021. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2692730725?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kahveci, Bekir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budak, Mehmet Sukru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ege, Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obut, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglı, Ihsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardar, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><title>PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding</title><title>Ginekologia polska</title><description>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the FIGO’s novel classification system versus the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out between August 2015 and September 2019 in the Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. The pathology reports of the patients were classified according to the PALM-COEIN method and were compared with classical terminology. The operated patients with fibroids reported in the pathology results were classified as subgroups of fibroids. RESULTS: Evaluation was made of a total of 515 women with abnormal uterine bleeding. According to the classical terminology, 137 (26.6%) patients were defined with hypermenorrhea, 74 (14.4%) with menorrhagia, 57 (11.1%) with metrorrhagia, and 246 (47.8%) with menometrorrhagia. In the PALM-COEIN classification system, polyps were determined in 84 (16.3%) cases, adenomyosis in 228 [diffuse adenomyosis: 196 (38.1%), local adenomyosis: 32 (6.2%)], leiomyoma in 386 [submu-cous: 161 (31.1%), other types: 225 (43.9%)], and malignancy and hyperplasia in 47 (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The classical terminology for abnormal uterine bleeding is insufficient in terms of etiological pathologies in non-pregnant women of reproductive age. The widespread use of this novel system for the abnormal uterine bleeding classification will provide a more useful communication between physicians and researchers.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Fibroids</subject><subject>Health sciences</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Hyperplasia</subject><subject>Hysterectomy</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyps</subject><subject>Terminology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0017-0011</issn><issn>2543-6767</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNotkEFvAiEQhUnTJjXWY-8kPa9loYB7NEa3JrZ6aM-EBVYxu2AB2_jvxepcJnn53kzeA-C5RGPKEHmtN2OJES7HCJXlHRhg-kYKxhm_B4Ms8eKiP4JRjHuUh2GOq2oA3Ga6-ihm6_nyE6pOxmhbq2Sy3sF4isn00LdwsazX8DfCtDM3SMFkQm-d7_z2BK2Dh-wxLkX4Z9MOysb50MsOHjNmnYFNZ4y2bvsEHlrZRTO67SH4Xsy_Zu_Fal0vZ9NVoUjJUqEqpdmEVowyxduJVI1EhGqDdU6hpdSm1IojxSiilDCkFWmobBjT2dO0hgzBy_XuIfifo4lJ7P0xuPxSYFZhThDHNFPFlVLBxxhMKw7B9jKcRInEpVVRb8R_q-LSHjkDrdJqzQ</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Kahveci, Bekir</creator><creator>Budak, Mehmet Sukru</creator><creator>Ege, Serhat</creator><creator>Obut, Mehmet</creator><creator>Baglı, Ihsan</creator><creator>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</creator><creator>Vardar, Mehmet Ali</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding</title><author>Kahveci, Bekir ; Budak, Mehmet Sukru ; Ege, Serhat ; Obut, Mehmet ; Baglı, Ihsan ; Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil ; Vardar, Mehmet Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c9cd6859656c7f8acba035de2d001daade1dc70c65055360dc3b5ab66d596bfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Fibroids</topic><topic>Health sciences</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Hyperplasia</topic><topic>Hysterectomy</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyps</topic><topic>Terminology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kahveci, Bekir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budak, Mehmet Sukru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ege, Serhat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Obut, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baglı, Ihsan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vardar, Mehmet Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Ginekologia polska</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kahveci, Bekir</au><au>Budak, Mehmet Sukru</au><au>Ege, Serhat</au><au>Obut, Mehmet</au><au>Baglı, Ihsan</au><au>Oğlak, Süleyman Cemil</au><au>Vardar, Mehmet Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding</atitle><jtitle>Ginekologia polska</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>257</spage><epage>261</epage><pages>257-261</pages><issn>0017-0011</issn><eissn>2543-6767</eissn><abstract>OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the FIGO’s novel classification system versus the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out between August 2015 and September 2019 in the Health Sciences University Gazi Yaşargil Training and Research Hospital. The pathology reports of the patients were classified according to the PALM-COEIN method and were compared with classical terminology. The operated patients with fibroids reported in the pathology results were classified as subgroups of fibroids. RESULTS: Evaluation was made of a total of 515 women with abnormal uterine bleeding. According to the classical terminology, 137 (26.6%) patients were defined with hypermenorrhea, 74 (14.4%) with menorrhagia, 57 (11.1%) with metrorrhagia, and 246 (47.8%) with menometrorrhagia. In the PALM-COEIN classification system, polyps were determined in 84 (16.3%) cases, adenomyosis in 228 [diffuse adenomyosis: 196 (38.1%), local adenomyosis: 32 (6.2%)], leiomyoma in 386 [submu-cous: 161 (31.1%), other types: 225 (43.9%)], and malignancy and hyperplasia in 47 (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The classical terminology for abnormal uterine bleeding is insufficient in terms of etiological pathologies in non-pregnant women of reproductive age. The widespread use of this novel system for the abnormal uterine bleeding classification will provide a more useful communication between physicians and researchers.</abstract><cop>Gdansk</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Via Medica</pub><doi>10.5603/GP.a2021.0011</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-0011
ispartof Ginekologia polska, 2021-01, Vol.92 (4), p.257-261
issn 0017-0011
2543-6767
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2692730725
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Age
Body mass index
Classification
Fibroids
Health sciences
Histopathology
Hyperplasia
Hysterectomy
Menstruation
Pathology
Patients
Polyps
Terminology
Womens health
title PALM-COEIN classification system of FIGO vs the classic terminology in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A07%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PALM-COEIN%20classification%20system%20of%20FIGO%20vs%20the%20classic%20terminology%20in%20patients%20with%20abnormal%20uterine%20bleeding&rft.jtitle=Ginekologia%20polska&rft.au=Kahveci,%20Bekir&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=261&rft.pages=257-261&rft.issn=0017-0011&rft.eissn=2543-6767&rft_id=info:doi/10.5603/GP.a2021.0011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2692730725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c9cd6859656c7f8acba035de2d001daade1dc70c65055360dc3b5ab66d596bfe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2692730725&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true