Loading…
Angiogenesis Genotyping and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Sorafenib: The ALICE-2 Study
Background Sorafenib represents one of the therapeutic strongholds for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but unfortunately, predictive factors are lacking. We previously reported that the VEGF single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs2010963 and rs4604006 might correlate with clinical outcome...
Saved in:
Published in: | Targeted oncology 2020-02, Vol.15 (1), p.115-126 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Sorafenib represents one of the therapeutic strongholds for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but unfortunately, predictive factors are lacking. We previously reported that the
VEGF
single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs2010963 and rs4604006 might correlate with clinical outcomes in sorafenib-treated HCC patients.
Objective
The objective of the ALICE-2 study is to define a prognostic angiogenesis profile to better identify HCC patients who are more likely to benefit from sorafenib treatment.
Patients and methods
From 2008 to 2015, all consecutive HCC patients receiving sorafenib according to the Italian label were tested for specific
HIF
-
1α
,
VEGF
, and
VEGFR
SNPs. Results from angiogenesis genotyping were then correlated with clinical outcome parameters.
Results
Globally, a total of 210 patients were enrolled. At multivariate analysis rs12434438 of
HIF1α
, rs2010963 of
VEGF
-
A
, and rs4604006 of
VEGF
-
C
were confirmed as independent predictive factors. At the combined analysis of significant SNPs, the presence of two favourable alleles of rs2010963 and rs4604006 of
VEGF
compared to only one or to none favourable alleles, was able to identify three separate patients populations with different time-to-progression (TTP) (10.8 vs. 5.6 vs. 3.7 months, respectively;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1776-2596 1776-260X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11523-020-00698-x |