Loading…
Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication
Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invas...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2022-08, Vol.59 (8), p.2059-2070 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3 |
container_end_page | 2070 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2059 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Oppel, Steffen Clark, Bethany L. Risi, Michelle M. Horswill, Catharine Converse, Sarah J. Jones, Christopher W. Osborne, Alexis M. Stevens, Kim Perold, Vonica Bond, Alexander L. Wanless, Ross M. Cuthbert, Richard Cooper, John Ryan, Peter G. |
description | Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments.
Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species.
We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island.
The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is nec |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1365-2664.14218 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2696991389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2696991389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKtrtwHX0yaTSZospdQbBV3oOqS5SMo4iclMpTsfwWf0SZzpiFvP5ofD950DPwCXGM1wP3NMGC1KxqoZrkrMj8Dkb3MMJgiVuOAC4VNwlvMWISQoIRPQLdM-tl7DGGJXq9aHBhqrk1XZQtNZ2Abom53KfmdhjlZ7m2FM1oyob6CCdWhevz-_6h4xMFu18anPLsaQ2gwb229dSNAmZbw-eOfgxKk624vfnIKXm9Xz8q5YP97eL6_XhSaU8YIzxq2jC7ogRjnniGGEVrRiFeOMO6dKJlipFcfcYCr0whjMhWYbZ3S5YY5MwdV4N6bw3tncym3oUtO_lIMqBCZc9NR8pHQKOSfrZEz-TaW9xEgO3cqhSTk0KQ_d9gYdjQ9f2_1_uHx4Wo3eD16nfhM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696991389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Oppel, Steffen ; Clark, Bethany L. ; Risi, Michelle M. ; Horswill, Catharine ; Converse, Sarah J. ; Jones, Christopher W. ; Osborne, Alexis M. ; Stevens, Kim ; Perold, Vonica ; Bond, Alexander L. ; Wanless, Ross M. ; Cuthbert, Richard ; Cooper, John ; Ryan, Peter G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oppel, Steffen ; Clark, Bethany L. ; Risi, Michelle M. ; Horswill, Catharine ; Converse, Sarah J. ; Jones, Christopher W. ; Osborne, Alexis M. ; Stevens, Kim ; Perold, Vonica ; Bond, Alexander L. ; Wanless, Ross M. ; Cuthbert, Richard ; Cooper, John ; Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments.
Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species.
We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island.
The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>albatross ; Aquatic birds ; Assessments ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; Birds ; Breeding sites ; Breeding success ; conservation management ; demography ; Endangered species ; Eradication ; Fisheries ; integrated population model ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; invasive species eradication ; life‐history ; mark‐recapture ; Nonnative species ; Population ; Population number ; Population status ; Population structure ; population viability analysis ; Predation ; Threatened species ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2022-08, Vol.59 (8), p.2059-2070</ispartof><rights>2022 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2022 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2125-7238 ; 0000-0002-3719-5441 ; 0000-0003-3696-1412 ; 0000-0001-5803-7744 ; 0000-0002-4112-1912 ; 0000-0002-1795-0753 ; 0000-0003-2130-281X ; 0000-0002-5885-1559 ; 0000-0002-8220-3789</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oppel, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Bethany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risi, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horswill, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Converse, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perold, Vonica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alexander L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanless, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><title>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments.
Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species.
We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island.
The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.</description><subject>albatross</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>conservation management</subject><subject>demography</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Eradication</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>integrated population model</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>invasive species eradication</subject><subject>life‐history</subject><subject>mark‐recapture</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Population status</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>population viability analysis</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKtrtwHX0yaTSZospdQbBV3oOqS5SMo4iclMpTsfwWf0SZzpiFvP5ofD950DPwCXGM1wP3NMGC1KxqoZrkrMj8Dkb3MMJgiVuOAC4VNwlvMWISQoIRPQLdM-tl7DGGJXq9aHBhqrk1XZQtNZ2Abom53KfmdhjlZ7m2FM1oyob6CCdWhevz-_6h4xMFu18anPLsaQ2gwb229dSNAmZbw-eOfgxKk624vfnIKXm9Xz8q5YP97eL6_XhSaU8YIzxq2jC7ogRjnniGGEVrRiFeOMO6dKJlipFcfcYCr0whjMhWYbZ3S5YY5MwdV4N6bw3tncym3oUtO_lIMqBCZc9NR8pHQKOSfrZEz-TaW9xEgO3cqhSTk0KQ_d9gYdjQ9f2_1_uHx4Wo3eD16nfhM</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Oppel, Steffen</creator><creator>Clark, Bethany L.</creator><creator>Risi, Michelle M.</creator><creator>Horswill, Catharine</creator><creator>Converse, Sarah J.</creator><creator>Jones, Christopher W.</creator><creator>Osborne, Alexis M.</creator><creator>Stevens, Kim</creator><creator>Perold, Vonica</creator><creator>Bond, Alexander L.</creator><creator>Wanless, Ross M.</creator><creator>Cuthbert, Richard</creator><creator>Cooper, John</creator><creator>Ryan, Peter G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-7238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-5441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-1412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4112-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-0753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-281X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-1559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-3789</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</title><author>Oppel, Steffen ; Clark, Bethany L. ; Risi, Michelle M. ; Horswill, Catharine ; Converse, Sarah J. ; Jones, Christopher W. ; Osborne, Alexis M. ; Stevens, Kim ; Perold, Vonica ; Bond, Alexander L. ; Wanless, Ross M. ; Cuthbert, Richard ; Cooper, John ; Ryan, Peter G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>albatross</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>conservation management</topic><topic>demography</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Eradication</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>integrated population model</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>invasive species eradication</topic><topic>life‐history</topic><topic>mark‐recapture</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Population status</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>population viability analysis</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oppel, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Bethany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risi, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horswill, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Converse, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perold, Vonica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alexander L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanless, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oppel, Steffen</au><au>Clark, Bethany L.</au><au>Risi, Michelle M.</au><au>Horswill, Catharine</au><au>Converse, Sarah J.</au><au>Jones, Christopher W.</au><au>Osborne, Alexis M.</au><au>Stevens, Kim</au><au>Perold, Vonica</au><au>Bond, Alexander L.</au><au>Wanless, Ross M.</au><au>Cuthbert, Richard</au><au>Cooper, John</au><au>Ryan, Peter G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2059</spage><epage>2070</epage><pages>2059-2070</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments.
Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species.
We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island.
The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.
Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.14218</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-7238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-5441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-1412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4112-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-0753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-281X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-1559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-3789</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2022-08, Vol.59 (8), p.2059-2070 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2696991389 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | albatross Aquatic birds Assessments Biodiversity Biodiversity loss Birds Breeding sites Breeding success conservation management demography Endangered species Eradication Fisheries integrated population model Introduced species Invasive species invasive species eradication life‐history mark‐recapture Nonnative species Population Population number Population status Population structure population viability analysis Predation Threatened species Uncertainty |
title | Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T07%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cryptic%20population%20decrease%20due%20to%20invasive%20species%20predation%20in%20a%20long%E2%80%90lived%20seabird%20supports%20need%20for%20eradication&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Oppel,%20Steffen&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2059&rft.epage=2070&rft.pages=2059-2070&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14218&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2696991389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696991389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |