Loading…

Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication

Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of applied ecology 2022-08, Vol.59 (8), p.2059-2070
Main Authors: Oppel, Steffen, Clark, Bethany L., Risi, Michelle M., Horswill, Catharine, Converse, Sarah J., Jones, Christopher W., Osborne, Alexis M., Stevens, Kim, Perold, Vonica, Bond, Alexander L., Wanless, Ross M., Cuthbert, Richard, Cooper, John, Ryan, Peter G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3
container_end_page 2070
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2059
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 59
creator Oppel, Steffen
Clark, Bethany L.
Risi, Michelle M.
Horswill, Catharine
Converse, Sarah J.
Jones, Christopher W.
Osborne, Alexis M.
Stevens, Kim
Perold, Vonica
Bond, Alexander L.
Wanless, Ross M.
Cuthbert, Richard
Cooper, John
Ryan, Peter G.
description Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments. Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species. We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island. The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is nec
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.14218
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2696991389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2696991389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKtrtwHX0yaTSZospdQbBV3oOqS5SMo4iclMpTsfwWf0SZzpiFvP5ofD950DPwCXGM1wP3NMGC1KxqoZrkrMj8Dkb3MMJgiVuOAC4VNwlvMWISQoIRPQLdM-tl7DGGJXq9aHBhqrk1XZQtNZ2Abom53KfmdhjlZ7m2FM1oyob6CCdWhevz-_6h4xMFu18anPLsaQ2gwb229dSNAmZbw-eOfgxKk624vfnIKXm9Xz8q5YP97eL6_XhSaU8YIzxq2jC7ogRjnniGGEVrRiFeOMO6dKJlipFcfcYCr0whjMhWYbZ3S5YY5MwdV4N6bw3tncym3oUtO_lIMqBCZc9NR8pHQKOSfrZEz-TaW9xEgO3cqhSTk0KQ_d9gYdjQ9f2_1_uHx4Wo3eD16nfhM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2696991389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Oppel, Steffen ; Clark, Bethany L. ; Risi, Michelle M. ; Horswill, Catharine ; Converse, Sarah J. ; Jones, Christopher W. ; Osborne, Alexis M. ; Stevens, Kim ; Perold, Vonica ; Bond, Alexander L. ; Wanless, Ross M. ; Cuthbert, Richard ; Cooper, John ; Ryan, Peter G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oppel, Steffen ; Clark, Bethany L. ; Risi, Michelle M. ; Horswill, Catharine ; Converse, Sarah J. ; Jones, Christopher W. ; Osborne, Alexis M. ; Stevens, Kim ; Perold, Vonica ; Bond, Alexander L. ; Wanless, Ross M. ; Cuthbert, Richard ; Cooper, John ; Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments. Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species. We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island. The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14218</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>albatross ; Aquatic birds ; Assessments ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; Birds ; Breeding sites ; Breeding success ; conservation management ; demography ; Endangered species ; Eradication ; Fisheries ; integrated population model ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; invasive species eradication ; life‐history ; mark‐recapture ; Nonnative species ; Population ; Population number ; Population status ; Population structure ; population viability analysis ; Predation ; Threatened species ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2022-08, Vol.59 (8), p.2059-2070</ispartof><rights>2022 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2022 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2125-7238 ; 0000-0002-3719-5441 ; 0000-0003-3696-1412 ; 0000-0001-5803-7744 ; 0000-0002-4112-1912 ; 0000-0002-1795-0753 ; 0000-0003-2130-281X ; 0000-0002-5885-1559 ; 0000-0002-8220-3789</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oppel, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Bethany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risi, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horswill, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Converse, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perold, Vonica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alexander L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanless, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><title>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments. Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species. We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island. The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.</description><subject>albatross</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>conservation management</subject><subject>demography</subject><subject>Endangered species</subject><subject>Eradication</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>integrated population model</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>invasive species eradication</subject><subject>life‐history</subject><subject>mark‐recapture</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population number</subject><subject>Population status</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>population viability analysis</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtKAzEUhoMoWKtrtwHX0yaTSZospdQbBV3oOqS5SMo4iclMpTsfwWf0SZzpiFvP5ofD950DPwCXGM1wP3NMGC1KxqoZrkrMj8Dkb3MMJgiVuOAC4VNwlvMWISQoIRPQLdM-tl7DGGJXq9aHBhqrk1XZQtNZ2Abom53KfmdhjlZ7m2FM1oyob6CCdWhevz-_6h4xMFu18anPLsaQ2gwb229dSNAmZbw-eOfgxKk624vfnIKXm9Xz8q5YP97eL6_XhSaU8YIzxq2jC7ogRjnniGGEVrRiFeOMO6dKJlipFcfcYCr0whjMhWYbZ3S5YY5MwdV4N6bw3tncym3oUtO_lIMqBCZc9NR8pHQKOSfrZEz-TaW9xEgO3cqhSTk0KQ_d9gYdjQ9f2_1_uHx4Wo3eD16nfhM</recordid><startdate>202208</startdate><enddate>202208</enddate><creator>Oppel, Steffen</creator><creator>Clark, Bethany L.</creator><creator>Risi, Michelle M.</creator><creator>Horswill, Catharine</creator><creator>Converse, Sarah J.</creator><creator>Jones, Christopher W.</creator><creator>Osborne, Alexis M.</creator><creator>Stevens, Kim</creator><creator>Perold, Vonica</creator><creator>Bond, Alexander L.</creator><creator>Wanless, Ross M.</creator><creator>Cuthbert, Richard</creator><creator>Cooper, John</creator><creator>Ryan, Peter G.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-7238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-5441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-1412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4112-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-0753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-281X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-1559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-3789</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202208</creationdate><title>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</title><author>Oppel, Steffen ; Clark, Bethany L. ; Risi, Michelle M. ; Horswill, Catharine ; Converse, Sarah J. ; Jones, Christopher W. ; Osborne, Alexis M. ; Stevens, Kim ; Perold, Vonica ; Bond, Alexander L. ; Wanless, Ross M. ; Cuthbert, Richard ; Cooper, John ; Ryan, Peter G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>albatross</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>conservation management</topic><topic>demography</topic><topic>Endangered species</topic><topic>Eradication</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>integrated population model</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>invasive species eradication</topic><topic>life‐history</topic><topic>mark‐recapture</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population number</topic><topic>Population status</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>population viability analysis</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oppel, Steffen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Bethany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Risi, Michelle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horswill, Catharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Converse, Sarah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osborne, Alexis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perold, Vonica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bond, Alexander L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wanless, Ross M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oppel, Steffen</au><au>Clark, Bethany L.</au><au>Risi, Michelle M.</au><au>Horswill, Catharine</au><au>Converse, Sarah J.</au><au>Jones, Christopher W.</au><au>Osborne, Alexis M.</au><au>Stevens, Kim</au><au>Perold, Vonica</au><au>Bond, Alexander L.</au><au>Wanless, Ross M.</au><au>Cuthbert, Richard</au><au>Cooper, John</au><au>Ryan, Peter G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2022-08</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2059</spage><epage>2070</epage><pages>2059-2070</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>Invasive species are one of the greatest drivers of biodiversity loss worldwide, and the eradication of invasive species from islands is a highly efficient management strategy. Because eradication operations require large financial investments, uncertainty over the magnitude of impacts of both invasive species and their removal can impede the willingness of decision makers to invest in eradication. Such uncertainty is prevalent for long‐lived species that display an inherent lag between life stages affected by invasive species and those used for population status assessments. Albatrosses are amongst the longest‐living bird species and are threatened on land by invasive species and at sea by industrial fisheries. As in many seabird species, usually only a segment of the population (breeding adults) is used for status assessments, making it difficult to assess albatross population trends and the potential benefit of conservation action, such as the management of predatory invasive species. We used population monitoring and mark‐recapture data to estimate the past population trajectory of the critically endangered Tristan albatross Diomedea dabbenena by accounting for unobservable birds at sea in an integrated population model. We then projected the future population trajectory of Tristan albatrosses for scenarios with or without predation by invasive house mice Mus musculus on their main breeding site, Gough Island. The adult breeding population remained stable between 2004 and 2021, but breeding success was low (31%) and our model indicated that the total population (including unobservable immature birds) decreased from a median estimate of 9,795 to 7,752 birds. Eradicating invasive mice leading to a two‐fold increase in breeding success would result in a 1.8–7.6 times higher albatross population by 2050 (median estimate 10,352 individuals) than without this intervention. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size. Low reproductive output for long‐lived species may lead to a cryptic population decrease, which can be obscured from readily available counts of breeding pairs by changes in the population structure. Mouse eradication is necessary to halt the ongoing population decrease of the Tristan albatross, even if this decrease is not yet apparent in the breeding population size.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.14218</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-7238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-5441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3696-1412</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5803-7744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4112-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-0753</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2130-281X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5885-1559</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8220-3789</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2022-08, Vol.59 (8), p.2059-2070
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2696991389
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects albatross
Aquatic birds
Assessments
Biodiversity
Biodiversity loss
Birds
Breeding sites
Breeding success
conservation management
demography
Endangered species
Eradication
Fisheries
integrated population model
Introduced species
Invasive species
invasive species eradication
life‐history
mark‐recapture
Nonnative species
Population
Population number
Population status
Population structure
population viability analysis
Predation
Threatened species
Uncertainty
title Cryptic population decrease due to invasive species predation in a long‐lived seabird supports need for eradication
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T07%3A55%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cryptic%20population%20decrease%20due%20to%20invasive%20species%20predation%20in%20a%20long%E2%80%90lived%20seabird%20supports%20need%20for%20eradication&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Oppel,%20Steffen&rft.date=2022-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2059&rft.epage=2070&rft.pages=2059-2070&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14218&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2696991389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3568-8668ef57573dafff3d635454646868ffa26962ca818d159c7dd189c6bfdc2b6f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2696991389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true