Loading…
Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation
Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Polymers for advanced technologies 2022-09, Vol.33 (9), p.3002-3012 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3 |
container_end_page | 3012 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3002 |
container_title | Polymers for advanced technologies |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Kitayama, Satoshi Matsubayashi, Akihiro Takano, Masahiro Yamazaki, Yusuke Kubo, Yoshikazu Aiba, Shuji |
description | Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pat.5735 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2697209458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2697209458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOAzEMRSMEEqUg8QmR2LCZkmQemVlWFS-pAhZlHRlPUqXMiyQDlK8nbdmysmUfX9uXkEvOZpwxcTNAmOUyzY_IhLOqSnhe8uNdnolE8kyekjPvN4zFXiUn5PNpbLWzCA3th2Bb-wPB9h3tDW3HJlgfYK3pAPhuuzUdnPZ-dLHgemMbTW1HhwZ8sBjTjcb9bNs39Y6Grqb6e4jyre5C3PAJja33-ufkxEDj9cVfnJLXu9vV4iFZPt8_LubLBEVZ5QkUyFDqVBRCloLXrJASDBRa5FiiKLIiA40CckQwpmRcSG5MVmMq8A0rTKfk6qAbD_4YtQ9q04-uiyuVKCopWJXlZaSuDxS63nunjRrizeC2ijO1c1VFV9XO1YgmB_Qrvr_9l1Mv89We_wUj6nw_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697209458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kitayama, Satoshi ; Matsubayashi, Akihiro ; Takano, Masahiro ; Yamazaki, Yusuke ; Kubo, Yoshikazu ; Aiba, Shuji</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitayama, Satoshi ; Matsubayashi, Akihiro ; Takano, Masahiro ; Yamazaki, Yusuke ; Kubo, Yoshikazu ; Aiba, Shuji</creatorcontrib><description>Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-7147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pat.5735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Clamping ; Cycle time ; Design optimization ; Injection molding ; Melt temperature ; multiobjective optimization ; multistage packing pressure profile ; numerical simulation ; plastic injection molding ; Powder injection molding ; Process parameters ; sequential approximate optimization ; Servocontrol ; Tool life ; Warpage</subject><ispartof>Polymers for advanced technologies, 2022-09, Vol.33 (9), p.3002-3012</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitayama, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiba, Shuji</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</title><title>Polymers for advanced technologies</title><description>Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Clamping</subject><subject>Cycle time</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Injection molding</subject><subject>Melt temperature</subject><subject>multiobjective optimization</subject><subject>multistage packing pressure profile</subject><subject>numerical simulation</subject><subject>plastic injection molding</subject><subject>Powder injection molding</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>sequential approximate optimization</subject><subject>Servocontrol</subject><subject>Tool life</subject><subject>Warpage</subject><issn>1042-7147</issn><issn>1099-1581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOAzEMRSMEEqUg8QmR2LCZkmQemVlWFS-pAhZlHRlPUqXMiyQDlK8nbdmysmUfX9uXkEvOZpwxcTNAmOUyzY_IhLOqSnhe8uNdnolE8kyekjPvN4zFXiUn5PNpbLWzCA3th2Bb-wPB9h3tDW3HJlgfYK3pAPhuuzUdnPZ-dLHgemMbTW1HhwZ8sBjTjcb9bNs39Y6Grqb6e4jyre5C3PAJja33-ufkxEDj9cVfnJLXu9vV4iFZPt8_LubLBEVZ5QkUyFDqVBRCloLXrJASDBRa5FiiKLIiA40CckQwpmRcSG5MVmMq8A0rTKfk6qAbD_4YtQ9q04-uiyuVKCopWJXlZaSuDxS63nunjRrizeC2ijO1c1VFV9XO1YgmB_Qrvr_9l1Mv89We_wUj6nw_</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Kitayama, Satoshi</creator><creator>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</creator><creator>Takano, Masahiro</creator><creator>Yamazaki, Yusuke</creator><creator>Kubo, Yoshikazu</creator><creator>Aiba, Shuji</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</title><author>Kitayama, Satoshi ; Matsubayashi, Akihiro ; Takano, Masahiro ; Yamazaki, Yusuke ; Kubo, Yoshikazu ; Aiba, Shuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Clamping</topic><topic>Cycle time</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Injection molding</topic><topic>Melt temperature</topic><topic>multiobjective optimization</topic><topic>multistage packing pressure profile</topic><topic>numerical simulation</topic><topic>plastic injection molding</topic><topic>Powder injection molding</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>sequential approximate optimization</topic><topic>Servocontrol</topic><topic>Tool life</topic><topic>Warpage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitayama, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiba, Shuji</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymers for advanced technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitayama, Satoshi</au><au>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</au><au>Takano, Masahiro</au><au>Yamazaki, Yusuke</au><au>Kubo, Yoshikazu</au><au>Aiba, Shuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</atitle><jtitle>Polymers for advanced technologies</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3002</spage><epage>3012</epage><pages>3002-3012</pages><issn>1042-7147</issn><eissn>1099-1581</eissn><abstract>Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/pat.5735</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1042-7147 |
ispartof | Polymers for advanced technologies, 2022-09, Vol.33 (9), p.3002-3012 |
issn | 1042-7147 1099-1581 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2697209458 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Artificial intelligence Clamping Cycle time Design optimization Injection molding Melt temperature multiobjective optimization multistage packing pressure profile numerical simulation plastic injection molding Powder injection molding Process parameters sequential approximate optimization Servocontrol Tool life Warpage |
title | Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A22%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20optimization%20of%20multistage%20packing%20pressure%20profile%20in%20plastic%20injection%20molding%20and%20experimental%20validation&rft.jtitle=Polymers%20for%20advanced%20technologies&rft.au=Kitayama,%20Satoshi&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3002&rft.epage=3012&rft.pages=3002-3012&rft.issn=1042-7147&rft.eissn=1099-1581&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pat.5735&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2697209458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697209458&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |