Loading…

Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation

Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Polymers for advanced technologies 2022-09, Vol.33 (9), p.3002-3012
Main Authors: Kitayama, Satoshi, Matsubayashi, Akihiro, Takano, Masahiro, Yamazaki, Yusuke, Kubo, Yoshikazu, Aiba, Shuji
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3
container_end_page 3012
container_issue 9
container_start_page 3002
container_title Polymers for advanced technologies
container_volume 33
creator Kitayama, Satoshi
Matsubayashi, Akihiro
Takano, Masahiro
Yamazaki, Yusuke
Kubo, Yoshikazu
Aiba, Shuji
description Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pat.5735
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2697209458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2697209458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtOAzEMRSMEEqUg8QmR2LCZkmQemVlWFS-pAhZlHRlPUqXMiyQDlK8nbdmysmUfX9uXkEvOZpwxcTNAmOUyzY_IhLOqSnhe8uNdnolE8kyekjPvN4zFXiUn5PNpbLWzCA3th2Bb-wPB9h3tDW3HJlgfYK3pAPhuuzUdnPZ-dLHgemMbTW1HhwZ8sBjTjcb9bNs39Y6Grqb6e4jyre5C3PAJja33-ufkxEDj9cVfnJLXu9vV4iFZPt8_LubLBEVZ5QkUyFDqVBRCloLXrJASDBRa5FiiKLIiA40CckQwpmRcSG5MVmMq8A0rTKfk6qAbD_4YtQ9q04-uiyuVKCopWJXlZaSuDxS63nunjRrizeC2ijO1c1VFV9XO1YgmB_Qrvr_9l1Mv89We_wUj6nw_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2697209458</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Kitayama, Satoshi ; Matsubayashi, Akihiro ; Takano, Masahiro ; Yamazaki, Yusuke ; Kubo, Yoshikazu ; Aiba, Shuji</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitayama, Satoshi ; Matsubayashi, Akihiro ; Takano, Masahiro ; Yamazaki, Yusuke ; Kubo, Yoshikazu ; Aiba, Shuji</creatorcontrib><description>Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1042-7147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1581</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pat.5735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Clamping ; Cycle time ; Design optimization ; Injection molding ; Melt temperature ; multiobjective optimization ; multistage packing pressure profile ; numerical simulation ; plastic injection molding ; Powder injection molding ; Process parameters ; sequential approximate optimization ; Servocontrol ; Tool life ; Warpage</subject><ispartof>Polymers for advanced technologies, 2022-09, Vol.33 (9), p.3002-3012</ispartof><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2022 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitayama, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiba, Shuji</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</title><title>Polymers for advanced technologies</title><description>Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Clamping</subject><subject>Cycle time</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Injection molding</subject><subject>Melt temperature</subject><subject>multiobjective optimization</subject><subject>multistage packing pressure profile</subject><subject>numerical simulation</subject><subject>plastic injection molding</subject><subject>Powder injection molding</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>sequential approximate optimization</subject><subject>Servocontrol</subject><subject>Tool life</subject><subject>Warpage</subject><issn>1042-7147</issn><issn>1099-1581</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtOAzEMRSMEEqUg8QmR2LCZkmQemVlWFS-pAhZlHRlPUqXMiyQDlK8nbdmysmUfX9uXkEvOZpwxcTNAmOUyzY_IhLOqSnhe8uNdnolE8kyekjPvN4zFXiUn5PNpbLWzCA3th2Bb-wPB9h3tDW3HJlgfYK3pAPhuuzUdnPZ-dLHgemMbTW1HhwZ8sBjTjcb9bNs39Y6Grqb6e4jyre5C3PAJja33-ufkxEDj9cVfnJLXu9vV4iFZPt8_LubLBEVZ5QkUyFDqVBRCloLXrJASDBRa5FiiKLIiA40CckQwpmRcSG5MVmMq8A0rTKfk6qAbD_4YtQ9q04-uiyuVKCopWJXlZaSuDxS63nunjRrizeC2ijO1c1VFV9XO1YgmB_Qrvr_9l1Mv89We_wUj6nw_</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Kitayama, Satoshi</creator><creator>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</creator><creator>Takano, Masahiro</creator><creator>Yamazaki, Yusuke</creator><creator>Kubo, Yoshikazu</creator><creator>Aiba, Shuji</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</title><author>Kitayama, Satoshi ; Matsubayashi, Akihiro ; Takano, Masahiro ; Yamazaki, Yusuke ; Kubo, Yoshikazu ; Aiba, Shuji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Clamping</topic><topic>Cycle time</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Injection molding</topic><topic>Melt temperature</topic><topic>multiobjective optimization</topic><topic>multistage packing pressure profile</topic><topic>numerical simulation</topic><topic>plastic injection molding</topic><topic>Powder injection molding</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>sequential approximate optimization</topic><topic>Servocontrol</topic><topic>Tool life</topic><topic>Warpage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitayama, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takano, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubo, Yoshikazu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aiba, Shuji</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Polymers for advanced technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitayama, Satoshi</au><au>Matsubayashi, Akihiro</au><au>Takano, Masahiro</au><au>Yamazaki, Yusuke</au><au>Kubo, Yoshikazu</au><au>Aiba, Shuji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation</atitle><jtitle>Polymers for advanced technologies</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3002</spage><epage>3012</epage><pages>3002-3012</pages><issn>1042-7147</issn><eissn>1099-1581</eissn><abstract>Plastic injection molding (PIM) is a crucial processing technology for producing lightweight products. Process parameters such as melt temperature, packing pressure, and cooling time directly affect not only the product quality but also the productivity, and they are conventionally adjusted by the trial‐and‐error method. A constant packing pressure is conventionally used, but the multistage packing pressure profile recently attracts attention. However, the packing pressure profile is unknown in advance, and it is difficult to determine it through the trial‐and‐error method. In this paper, the multistage packing pressure profile as well as other process parameters so as to minimize the warpage and cycle time are determined by using computational intelligence and design optimization. It is found from the numerical result that 27% warpage and 50% cycle time reduction can be achieved, compared with ones using reference process parameters. In addition, it is clarified that clamping force can be reduced. This indicates that PIM using the optimal multi‐stage packing pressure profile can produce plastic product with small clamping force that makes the tool life long. Finally, the experiment using PIM machine equipped with servo controller (MS100, Sodick) is carried out to examine the effectiveness of the multistage packing pressure profile.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/pat.5735</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1042-7147
ispartof Polymers for advanced technologies, 2022-09, Vol.33 (9), p.3002-3012
issn 1042-7147
1099-1581
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2697209458
source Wiley
subjects Artificial intelligence
Clamping
Cycle time
Design optimization
Injection molding
Melt temperature
multiobjective optimization
multistage packing pressure profile
numerical simulation
plastic injection molding
Powder injection molding
Process parameters
sequential approximate optimization
Servocontrol
Tool life
Warpage
title Numerical optimization of multistage packing pressure profile in plastic injection molding and experimental validation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A22%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20optimization%20of%20multistage%20packing%20pressure%20profile%20in%20plastic%20injection%20molding%20and%20experimental%20validation&rft.jtitle=Polymers%20for%20advanced%20technologies&rft.au=Kitayama,%20Satoshi&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3002&rft.epage=3012&rft.pages=3002-3012&rft.issn=1042-7147&rft.eissn=1099-1581&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pat.5735&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2697209458%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2895-a6c0c7e32627821d0677afa6e25c8c26464aec2a5ccaff801271ff4dc32cbc9c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2697209458&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true