Remembering and forgetting: the state policy of memorializing Stalin's repression in post-Soviet Kazakhstan

• Published in: Nationalities papers 2016-07, Vol.44 (4), p.611-627
• Main Authors: Kundakbayeva, Zhanat, Kassymova, Didar
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Camps; Collective memory; Commemoration; commemorative narrative; Detention; Detention centers; Discourse; Ethnic groups; Ethnic identity; Exhibitions; Intellectuals; Kazakhstan; Letters (Correspondence); memorialization; Nation states; National identity; Nationalism; Oppression; Postcommunist societies; Presidents; Prioritizing; Public officials; Public spaces; Soviet repression; Speeches; Stalinism; Symbolism; the non-nationalistic discourse; Victims
• ISSN: 0090-5992; 1465-3923
• DOI: 10.1080/00905992.2016.1158157

The general perception of Western analysts and observers is that the nation-states created as a result of the breakup of the Soviet Union all treat the memory of the dark, repressive aspects of the Stalinist regime in public spaces as a symbolic element in the creation of a new post-Soviet identity [Denison, Michael. 2009. “The Art of the Impossible: Political Symbolism, and the Creation of National Identity and Collective Memory in Post-Soviet Turkmenistan.” Europe-Asia Studies 61 (7): 1167–1187]. We argue that the government of Kazakhstan employs non-nationalistic discourse in its treatment of Stalinist victims’ commemoration in a variety of forms, through the creation of modern memorial complexes at the sites of horrific Soviet activity (mass burial places, labor camps, and detention centers), purpose-built museum exhibitions, and the commemorative speeches of its president and other officials. Kazakhstan's strategy in commemorating its Soviet past is designed to highlight the inclusiveness of repression on all peoples living in its territory at that time, not just Kazakhs, thereby assisting in bringing together its multinational and multiethnic society. Thus, the official stance treats this discourse as an important symbolic source of shaping the collective memory of the nation, based on “a general civil identity without prioritizing one ethnic group over another — a national unity, founded on the recognition of a common system of values and principles for all citizens” [Shakirova, Svetlana. 2012. “Letters to Nazarbaev: Kazakhstan's Intellectuals Debate National Identity.” February 7. Accessed July 28, 2015. http://postsovietpost.stanford.edu/discussion/letters-nazarbaev-kazakhstans-intellectuals-debate-national-identity].