Loading…

Flocculation of Riverine Sediment Draining to the Great Barrier Reef, Implications for Monitoring and Modeling of Sediment Dispersal Across Continental Shelves

Sediment transport models, utilized to guide land management in the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), assume settling velocities for individual silt and clay particles on the order of 0.01 mm/s; however, silts and clays once flocculated exhibit settling velocities on the order of 1 mm/s. In this study, in‐s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2022-07, Vol.127 (7), p.n/a
Main Authors: Livsey, D. N., Crosswell, J. R., Turner, R. D. R., Steven, A. D. L., Grace, P. R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Sediment transport models, utilized to guide land management in the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), assume settling velocities for individual silt and clay particles on the order of 0.01 mm/s; however, silts and clays once flocculated exhibit settling velocities on the order of 1 mm/s. In this study, in‐situ (n = 144,912) and laboratory‐dispersed (n = 64) particle size measurements collected using laser diffractometry were compared from nine rivers discharging along 800 km of GBR coastline to determine the extent of in‐situ flocculation. Environmental controls on in‐situ particle size were investigated using decision tree algorithms trained on coeval measurements of salinity, shear rate, and turbidity. Comparison of in‐situ and dispersed particle size measurements demonstrate that suspended‐sediment across all catchments flocculated into larger aggregates with an order‐of‐magnitude difference in median particle size between in‐situ (D50v = 132 μm, σ = 60 μm for all data) and dispersed (D50v = 15 μm, σ = 11 μm for all data) particles. Machine learning algorithms showed excellent promise predicting various measures of in‐situ particle size. Model validation R2 ranged from 0.72 to 0.99, inclusion of catchment as a categorical variable only marginally (
ISSN:2169-9275
2169-9291
DOI:10.1029/2021JC017988