Loading…
High sensitivity and low detection limit of acetone sensor based on Ru-doped Co3O4 flower-like hollow microspheres
In this paper, we successfully prepared Ru-doped Co3O4 flower-like hollow microspheres by a simple hydrothermal method. The microstructure characterization results indicated the formation of well-organized microflowers with a size of 0.5–1 µm, which were composed of nanosheets. The gas sensing perfo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sensors and actuators. B, Chemical Chemical, 2022-07, Vol.363, p.131839, Article 131839 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In this paper, we successfully prepared Ru-doped Co3O4 flower-like hollow microspheres by a simple hydrothermal method. The microstructure characterization results indicated the formation of well-organized microflowers with a size of 0.5–1 µm, which were composed of nanosheets. The gas sensing performances of sensors by using the synthesized Ru-doped Co3O4 hollow microflowers as sensing material were investigated. The 1 at% Ru-doped Co3O4 sensor showed the best acetone sensing performance and had a response 18.8–10 ppm acetone, which was almost 5.4 times that of pure Co3O4. Significantly, the sensor had an ultra-low detection limit, with a response value of 1.5–50 ppb acetone at 137.5 °C (30%RH). We propose a plausible mechanism for sensing performance improvement. Namely, the substitution of Ru4+ regulated the carrier concentration and induced the change of Co3O4 defect oxygen and chemisorbed oxygen.
•Ru-doped Co3O4 flower-like hollow microspheres were synthesized via a facile one-step hydrothermal method.•1 at% Ru-doped Co3O4 flower-like hollow microspheres exhibited better acetone gas sensing performance.•1 at% Ru-doped Co3O4 sensor had a response 18.8–10 ppm acetone at 137.5 ℃.•1 at% Ru-doped Co3O4 sensor had a low detection limit (50 ppb-1.5). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0925-4005 1873-3077 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.snb.2022.131839 |