Loading…
Does CEO–Audit Committee/Board Interlocking Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility?
This study examines the impact of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)’s interlocking, created through serving on other companies’ audit committees and/or boards, on corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of the focal company (interlocked CEO’s company) and that of its linked companies. We f...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of business ethics 2022-09, Vol.179 (3), p.819-847 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | This study examines the impact of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)’s interlocking, created through serving on other companies’ audit committees and/or boards, on corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance of the focal company (interlocked CEO’s company) and that of its linked companies. We find that CEO interlocking positively affects CSR performance of both the focal company and its linked companies. Further analysis shows that interlocks created by the CEO enhance CSR performance and in turn the financial performance of both the focal company and its linked companies. Our findings are robust to a battery of analyses, including Heckman’s (1979) selection bias correction, propensity score matching (PSM), alternative measures of CSR performance, and CEO interlocks. These findings are important to regulators, company management teams, and other stakeholders with an interest in how the social ties of CEOs influence companies’ CSR performance and in the CSR–financial performance nexus. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10551-021-04871-8 |