Loading…
Salicylic Acid as a Tolerance Inducer of Drought Stress on Sunflower Grown in Sandy Soil
Agricultural water rationalization expressed in irrigating the plants below their requirements became a significant strategy in crop water management. However, reduction in crop productivity under low water supply is realized. Therefore, the current study aimed to diminish sunflower yield losses ass...
Saved in:
Published in: | Gesunde Pflanzen 2022-09, Vol.74 (3), p.603-613 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c35f4dce08e11bdd04add7a5d31fa624266fc1cf7bed10b528398ae5715ba4f13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c35f4dce08e11bdd04add7a5d31fa624266fc1cf7bed10b528398ae5715ba4f13 |
container_end_page | 613 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 603 |
container_title | Gesunde Pflanzen |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | El–Bially, Mohamed E. Saudy, Hani S. Hashem, Fadl A. El–Gabry, Yasser A. Shahin, Mostafa G. |
description | Agricultural water rationalization expressed in irrigating the plants below their requirements became a significant strategy in crop water management. However, reduction in crop productivity under low water supply is realized. Therefore, the current study aimed to diminish sunflower yield losses associated with deficit irrigation using salicylic acid (SA). During two seasons of 2019 and 2020 at El Nubaria region, El Behaira Governorate, Egypt, combinations of three irrigation regimes (100, 85 and 70% of crop evapotranspiration, denoted WR
100%
, WR
85%
, and WR
70%
, respectively), and three levels of SA (0.0, 0.5, and 1 mM. abbreviated as SA
0.0
, SA
0.5
, and SA
1.0
, respectively) on sunflower plants performance were evaluated. Treatments were arranged in a strip–plot design with three replicates. Findings revealed that treated sunflower plants with WR
100%
× SA
1.0
contained the highest amounts of total chlorophyll and carotenoids as well as the lowest proline content. Seed yield of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
treatment was higher than that of WR
70%
× SA
0.0
by 109.7% in the first season and 125.9% in the second one. As averages of the two seasons, SA
0.5
and SA
1.0
lowered the reductions in seed yield from 21.0% to 15.8 and 14.4% as well as 46.2% to 40.8 and 40.1% under WR
85%
and WR
70%
, respectively, compared to the farmer common practice (WR
100%
× SA
0.0
). WR
100%
× SA
1.0
for iodine value as well as WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
for seed oil % were recorded the highest. Application of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
were the effective combinations for ameliorating water use efficiency. In conclusion, involving salicylic acid in irrigation programs of sunflower became a decisive action to save water and alleviate the yield losses resulting from drought stress. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10343-022-00635-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2702349214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2702349214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c35f4dce08e11bdd04add7a5d31fa624266fc1cf7bed10b528398ae5715ba4f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFZfwNOC5-jsvyQ9lqq1UPCQevC0bPZPTYnZupsgfRufxSdzNYI3DzMD38z3DfwQuiRwTQCKm0iAcZYBpRlAzkQGR2hCOJtlSRfHaAIsLzJOKTtFZzHuAEjBSjFBz5VqG31Ihee6MVhFrD4_Nr61QXXa4lVnBm0D9g7fBj9sX3pc9cHGiH2Hq6FzrX9P62Xw7x1ukqQ6c8CVb9pzdOJUG-3F75yip_u7zeIhWz8uV4v5OtMsZ33qwnGjLZSWkNoY4MqYQgnDiFM55TTPnSbaFbU1BGpBSzYrlRUFEbXijrApuhpz98G_DTb2cueH0KWXkhZAGZ_RBGKK6Hilg48xWCf3oXlV4SAJyG-EckQoE0L5g1BCMrHRFNNxt7XhL_of1xcTRHSU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702349214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Salicylic Acid as a Tolerance Inducer of Drought Stress on Sunflower Grown in Sandy Soil</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>El–Bially, Mohamed E. ; Saudy, Hani S. ; Hashem, Fadl A. ; El–Gabry, Yasser A. ; Shahin, Mostafa G.</creator><creatorcontrib>El–Bially, Mohamed E. ; Saudy, Hani S. ; Hashem, Fadl A. ; El–Gabry, Yasser A. ; Shahin, Mostafa G.</creatorcontrib><description>Agricultural water rationalization expressed in irrigating the plants below their requirements became a significant strategy in crop water management. However, reduction in crop productivity under low water supply is realized. Therefore, the current study aimed to diminish sunflower yield losses associated with deficit irrigation using salicylic acid (SA). During two seasons of 2019 and 2020 at El Nubaria region, El Behaira Governorate, Egypt, combinations of three irrigation regimes (100, 85 and 70% of crop evapotranspiration, denoted WR
100%
, WR
85%
, and WR
70%
, respectively), and three levels of SA (0.0, 0.5, and 1 mM. abbreviated as SA
0.0
, SA
0.5
, and SA
1.0
, respectively) on sunflower plants performance were evaluated. Treatments were arranged in a strip–plot design with three replicates. Findings revealed that treated sunflower plants with WR
100%
× SA
1.0
contained the highest amounts of total chlorophyll and carotenoids as well as the lowest proline content. Seed yield of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
treatment was higher than that of WR
70%
× SA
0.0
by 109.7% in the first season and 125.9% in the second one. As averages of the two seasons, SA
0.5
and SA
1.0
lowered the reductions in seed yield from 21.0% to 15.8 and 14.4% as well as 46.2% to 40.8 and 40.1% under WR
85%
and WR
70%
, respectively, compared to the farmer common practice (WR
100%
× SA
0.0
). WR
100%
× SA
1.0
for iodine value as well as WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
for seed oil % were recorded the highest. Application of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
were the effective combinations for ameliorating water use efficiency. In conclusion, involving salicylic acid in irrigation programs of sunflower became a decisive action to save water and alleviate the yield losses resulting from drought stress.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0367-4223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0345</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10343-022-00635-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carotenoids ; Chlorophyll ; Crop management ; Crop production ; Crop yield ; Crops ; Drought ; Evapotranspiration ; Helianthus ; Iodine ; Irrigation ; Irrigation programs ; Life Sciences ; Oils & fats ; Original Article ; Originalbeitrag ; Plant Pathology ; Salicylic acid ; Sandy soils ; Seasons ; Seeds ; Soil water ; Sunflowers ; Water management ; Water shortages ; Water supply ; Water use ; Water use efficiency</subject><ispartof>Gesunde Pflanzen, 2022-09, Vol.74 (3), p.603-613</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c35f4dce08e11bdd04add7a5d31fa624266fc1cf7bed10b528398ae5715ba4f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c35f4dce08e11bdd04add7a5d31fa624266fc1cf7bed10b528398ae5715ba4f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6341-6156</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>El–Bially, Mohamed E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saudy, Hani S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashem, Fadl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El–Gabry, Yasser A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahin, Mostafa G.</creatorcontrib><title>Salicylic Acid as a Tolerance Inducer of Drought Stress on Sunflower Grown in Sandy Soil</title><title>Gesunde Pflanzen</title><addtitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</addtitle><description>Agricultural water rationalization expressed in irrigating the plants below their requirements became a significant strategy in crop water management. However, reduction in crop productivity under low water supply is realized. Therefore, the current study aimed to diminish sunflower yield losses associated with deficit irrigation using salicylic acid (SA). During two seasons of 2019 and 2020 at El Nubaria region, El Behaira Governorate, Egypt, combinations of three irrigation regimes (100, 85 and 70% of crop evapotranspiration, denoted WR
100%
, WR
85%
, and WR
70%
, respectively), and three levels of SA (0.0, 0.5, and 1 mM. abbreviated as SA
0.0
, SA
0.5
, and SA
1.0
, respectively) on sunflower plants performance were evaluated. Treatments were arranged in a strip–plot design with three replicates. Findings revealed that treated sunflower plants with WR
100%
× SA
1.0
contained the highest amounts of total chlorophyll and carotenoids as well as the lowest proline content. Seed yield of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
treatment was higher than that of WR
70%
× SA
0.0
by 109.7% in the first season and 125.9% in the second one. As averages of the two seasons, SA
0.5
and SA
1.0
lowered the reductions in seed yield from 21.0% to 15.8 and 14.4% as well as 46.2% to 40.8 and 40.1% under WR
85%
and WR
70%
, respectively, compared to the farmer common practice (WR
100%
× SA
0.0
). WR
100%
× SA
1.0
for iodine value as well as WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
for seed oil % were recorded the highest. Application of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
were the effective combinations for ameliorating water use efficiency. In conclusion, involving salicylic acid in irrigation programs of sunflower became a decisive action to save water and alleviate the yield losses resulting from drought stress.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carotenoids</subject><subject>Chlorophyll</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Helianthus</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation programs</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Oils & fats</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Originalbeitrag</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Salicylic acid</subject><subject>Sandy soils</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Sunflowers</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water shortages</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><subject>Water use</subject><subject>Water use efficiency</subject><issn>0367-4223</issn><issn>1439-0345</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQxhdRsFZfwNOC5-jsvyQ9lqq1UPCQevC0bPZPTYnZupsgfRufxSdzNYI3DzMD38z3DfwQuiRwTQCKm0iAcZYBpRlAzkQGR2hCOJtlSRfHaAIsLzJOKTtFZzHuAEjBSjFBz5VqG31Ihee6MVhFrD4_Nr61QXXa4lVnBm0D9g7fBj9sX3pc9cHGiH2Hq6FzrX9P62Xw7x1ukqQ6c8CVb9pzdOJUG-3F75yip_u7zeIhWz8uV4v5OtMsZ33qwnGjLZSWkNoY4MqYQgnDiFM55TTPnSbaFbU1BGpBSzYrlRUFEbXijrApuhpz98G_DTb2cueH0KWXkhZAGZ_RBGKK6Hilg48xWCf3oXlV4SAJyG-EckQoE0L5g1BCMrHRFNNxt7XhL_of1xcTRHSU</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>El–Bially, Mohamed E.</creator><creator>Saudy, Hani S.</creator><creator>Hashem, Fadl A.</creator><creator>El–Gabry, Yasser A.</creator><creator>Shahin, Mostafa G.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-6156</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Salicylic Acid as a Tolerance Inducer of Drought Stress on Sunflower Grown in Sandy Soil</title><author>El–Bially, Mohamed E. ; Saudy, Hani S. ; Hashem, Fadl A. ; El–Gabry, Yasser A. ; Shahin, Mostafa G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c35f4dce08e11bdd04add7a5d31fa624266fc1cf7bed10b528398ae5715ba4f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carotenoids</topic><topic>Chlorophyll</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Helianthus</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation programs</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Oils & fats</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Originalbeitrag</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Salicylic acid</topic><topic>Sandy soils</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Sunflowers</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water shortages</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><topic>Water use</topic><topic>Water use efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El–Bially, Mohamed E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saudy, Hani S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashem, Fadl A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El–Gabry, Yasser A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shahin, Mostafa G.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El–Bially, Mohamed E.</au><au>Saudy, Hani S.</au><au>Hashem, Fadl A.</au><au>El–Gabry, Yasser A.</au><au>Shahin, Mostafa G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Salicylic Acid as a Tolerance Inducer of Drought Stress on Sunflower Grown in Sandy Soil</atitle><jtitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</jtitle><stitle>Gesunde Pflanzen</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>603</spage><epage>613</epage><pages>603-613</pages><issn>0367-4223</issn><eissn>1439-0345</eissn><abstract>Agricultural water rationalization expressed in irrigating the plants below their requirements became a significant strategy in crop water management. However, reduction in crop productivity under low water supply is realized. Therefore, the current study aimed to diminish sunflower yield losses associated with deficit irrigation using salicylic acid (SA). During two seasons of 2019 and 2020 at El Nubaria region, El Behaira Governorate, Egypt, combinations of three irrigation regimes (100, 85 and 70% of crop evapotranspiration, denoted WR
100%
, WR
85%
, and WR
70%
, respectively), and three levels of SA (0.0, 0.5, and 1 mM. abbreviated as SA
0.0
, SA
0.5
, and SA
1.0
, respectively) on sunflower plants performance were evaluated. Treatments were arranged in a strip–plot design with three replicates. Findings revealed that treated sunflower plants with WR
100%
× SA
1.0
contained the highest amounts of total chlorophyll and carotenoids as well as the lowest proline content. Seed yield of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
treatment was higher than that of WR
70%
× SA
0.0
by 109.7% in the first season and 125.9% in the second one. As averages of the two seasons, SA
0.5
and SA
1.0
lowered the reductions in seed yield from 21.0% to 15.8 and 14.4% as well as 46.2% to 40.8 and 40.1% under WR
85%
and WR
70%
, respectively, compared to the farmer common practice (WR
100%
× SA
0.0
). WR
100%
× SA
1.0
for iodine value as well as WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
for seed oil % were recorded the highest. Application of WR
100%
× SA
1.0
and WR
100%
× SA
0.5
were the effective combinations for ameliorating water use efficiency. In conclusion, involving salicylic acid in irrigation programs of sunflower became a decisive action to save water and alleviate the yield losses resulting from drought stress.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10343-022-00635-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-6156</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0367-4223 |
ispartof | Gesunde Pflanzen, 2022-09, Vol.74 (3), p.603-613 |
issn | 0367-4223 1439-0345 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2702349214 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Agricultural production Agriculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Carotenoids Chlorophyll Crop management Crop production Crop yield Crops Drought Evapotranspiration Helianthus Iodine Irrigation Irrigation programs Life Sciences Oils & fats Original Article Originalbeitrag Plant Pathology Salicylic acid Sandy soils Seasons Seeds Soil water Sunflowers Water management Water shortages Water supply Water use Water use efficiency |
title | Salicylic Acid as a Tolerance Inducer of Drought Stress on Sunflower Grown in Sandy Soil |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T16%3A56%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Salicylic%20Acid%20as%20a%C2%A0Tolerance%20Inducer%20of%20Drought%20Stress%20on%20Sunflower%20Grown%20in%20Sandy%20Soil&rft.jtitle=Gesunde%20Pflanzen&rft.au=El%E2%80%93Bially,%20Mohamed%20E.&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=603&rft.epage=613&rft.pages=603-613&rft.issn=0367-4223&rft.eissn=1439-0345&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10343-022-00635-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2702349214%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-c35f4dce08e11bdd04add7a5d31fa624266fc1cf7bed10b528398ae5715ba4f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702349214&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |