Loading…
Bias amplification in experimental social networks is reduced by resampling
Large-scale social networks are thought to contribute to polarization by amplifying people's biases. However, the complexity of these technologies makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms responsible and to evaluate mitigation strategies. Here we show under controlled laboratory conditions...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2022-10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Hardy, Mathew D Thompson, Bill D Krafft, P M Griffiths, Thomas L |
description | Large-scale social networks are thought to contribute to polarization by amplifying people's biases. However, the complexity of these technologies makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms responsible and to evaluate mitigation strategies. Here we show under controlled laboratory conditions that information transmission through social networks amplifies motivational biases on a simple perceptual decision-making task. Participants in a large behavioral experiment showed increased rates of biased decision-making when part of a social network relative to asocial participants, across 40 independently evolving populations. Drawing on techniques from machine learning and Bayesian statistics, we identify a simple adjustment to content-selection algorithms that is predicted to mitigate bias amplification. This algorithm generates a sample of perspectives from within an individual's network that is more representative of the population as a whole. In a second large experiment, this strategy reduced bias amplification while maintaining the benefits of information sharing. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2702669171</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2702669171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_27026691713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjsEKwjAQRIMgWLT_sOC50Ca21auiCF69S2y3srVNajZF_XuD-AGe3sC8gZmISCqVJeuVlDMRM7dpmsqilHmuInHakmbQ_dBRQ5X2ZA2QAXwN6KhH43UHbCsKMOif1t0ZiMFhPVZYw_UdIn_n5rYQ00Z3jPGPc7E87M-7YzI4-xiR_aW1ozOhusgyXCg2WZmp_6wPXII9ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2702669171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bias amplification in experimental social networks is reduced by resampling</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Hardy, Mathew D ; Thompson, Bill D ; Krafft, P M ; Griffiths, Thomas L</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mathew D ; Thompson, Bill D ; Krafft, P M ; Griffiths, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><description>Large-scale social networks are thought to contribute to polarization by amplifying people's biases. However, the complexity of these technologies makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms responsible and to evaluate mitigation strategies. Here we show under controlled laboratory conditions that information transmission through social networks amplifies motivational biases on a simple perceptual decision-making task. Participants in a large behavioral experiment showed increased rates of biased decision-making when part of a social network relative to asocial participants, across 40 independently evolving populations. Drawing on techniques from machine learning and Bayesian statistics, we identify a simple adjustment to content-selection algorithms that is predicted to mitigate bias amplification. This algorithm generates a sample of perspectives from within an individual's network that is more representative of the population as a whole. In a second large experiment, this strategy reduced bias amplification while maintaining the benefits of information sharing.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Amplification ; Decision making ; Human bias ; Machine learning ; Resampling ; Social networks</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2022-10</ispartof><rights>2022. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2702669171?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mathew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Bill D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krafft, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><title>Bias amplification in experimental social networks is reduced by resampling</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Large-scale social networks are thought to contribute to polarization by amplifying people's biases. However, the complexity of these technologies makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms responsible and to evaluate mitigation strategies. Here we show under controlled laboratory conditions that information transmission through social networks amplifies motivational biases on a simple perceptual decision-making task. Participants in a large behavioral experiment showed increased rates of biased decision-making when part of a social network relative to asocial participants, across 40 independently evolving populations. Drawing on techniques from machine learning and Bayesian statistics, we identify a simple adjustment to content-selection algorithms that is predicted to mitigate bias amplification. This algorithm generates a sample of perspectives from within an individual's network that is more representative of the population as a whole. In a second large experiment, this strategy reduced bias amplification while maintaining the benefits of information sharing.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Human bias</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Resampling</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjsEKwjAQRIMgWLT_sOC50Ca21auiCF69S2y3srVNajZF_XuD-AGe3sC8gZmISCqVJeuVlDMRM7dpmsqilHmuInHakmbQ_dBRQ5X2ZA2QAXwN6KhH43UHbCsKMOif1t0ZiMFhPVZYw_UdIn_n5rYQ00Z3jPGPc7E87M-7YzI4-xiR_aW1ozOhusgyXCg2WZmp_6wPXII9ww</recordid><startdate>20221005</startdate><enddate>20221005</enddate><creator>Hardy, Mathew D</creator><creator>Thompson, Bill D</creator><creator>Krafft, P M</creator><creator>Griffiths, Thomas L</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221005</creationdate><title>Bias amplification in experimental social networks is reduced by resampling</title><author>Hardy, Mathew D ; Thompson, Bill D ; Krafft, P M ; Griffiths, Thomas L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27026691713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Human bias</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Resampling</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardy, Mathew D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Bill D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krafft, P M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffiths, Thomas L</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardy, Mathew D</au><au>Thompson, Bill D</au><au>Krafft, P M</au><au>Griffiths, Thomas L</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Bias amplification in experimental social networks is reduced by resampling</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2022-10-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Large-scale social networks are thought to contribute to polarization by amplifying people's biases. However, the complexity of these technologies makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms responsible and to evaluate mitigation strategies. Here we show under controlled laboratory conditions that information transmission through social networks amplifies motivational biases on a simple perceptual decision-making task. Participants in a large behavioral experiment showed increased rates of biased decision-making when part of a social network relative to asocial participants, across 40 independently evolving populations. Drawing on techniques from machine learning and Bayesian statistics, we identify a simple adjustment to content-selection algorithms that is predicted to mitigate bias amplification. This algorithm generates a sample of perspectives from within an individual's network that is more representative of the population as a whole. In a second large experiment, this strategy reduced bias amplification while maintaining the benefits of information sharing.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2022-10 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2702669171 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Algorithms Amplification Decision making Human bias Machine learning Resampling Social networks |
title | Bias amplification in experimental social networks is reduced by resampling |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A54%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Bias%20amplification%20in%20experimental%20social%20networks%20is%20reduced%20by%20resampling&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Hardy,%20Mathew%20D&rft.date=2022-10-05&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2702669171%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_27026691713%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2702669171&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |