Loading…

Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower

The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of vibration and control 2022-09, Vol.28 (17-18), p.2240-2253
Main Authors: Chen, Junling, Li, Jinwei, Wang, Dawei, Feng, Youquan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3
container_end_page 2253
container_issue 17-18
container_start_page 2240
container_title Journal of vibration and control
container_volume 28
creator Chen, Junling
Li, Jinwei
Wang, Dawei
Feng, Youquan
description The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10775463211007592
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2703910186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10775463211007592</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2703910186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geetMkt00RylahYIHe1-yuxNNaTc12VL25jv4hj6JWyp4EE8zzHz_z8_P2DXCBFHrWwStc1VIgQigcyNO2Ai1wkyYaXE67MM_OwDn7CKlFQAohTBi8xfyaeNrHiltQ5uI29au--QTD46njmj99fFZh7aO1BF_66voG773bcO7Xax8S7wLe4qX7MzZdaKrnzlmy4f75ewxWzzPn2Z3i6yWKLrMyEIYchLA5iInKXWOttIid-ZwrqghARUIa1WhEZ1TRhVNo51tpNWVHLObo-02hvcdpa5chV0cEqdSaJAGAafFQOGRqmNIKZIrt9FvbOxLhPJQV_mnrkEzOWqSfaVf1_8F313TaxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703910186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Chen, Junling ; Li, Jinwei ; Wang, Dawei ; Feng, Youquan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junling ; Li, Jinwei ; Wang, Dawei ; Feng, Youquan</creatorcontrib><description>The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10775463211007592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Dynamic response ; Finite element method ; Ground motion ; Mathematical models ; Segments ; Seismic design ; Seismic response ; Steel ; Steel tubes ; Stiffness ; Turbines ; Wind power ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Journal of vibration and control, 2022-09, Vol.28 (17-18), p.2240-2253</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0062-6292 ; 0000-0001-5745-4060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,79134</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Youquan</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</title><title>Journal of vibration and control</title><description>The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower.</description><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steel tubes</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>1077-5463</issn><issn>1741-2986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geetMkt00RylahYIHe1-yuxNNaTc12VL25jv4hj6JWyp4EE8zzHz_z8_P2DXCBFHrWwStc1VIgQigcyNO2Ai1wkyYaXE67MM_OwDn7CKlFQAohTBi8xfyaeNrHiltQ5uI29au--QTD46njmj99fFZh7aO1BF_66voG773bcO7Xax8S7wLe4qX7MzZdaKrnzlmy4f75ewxWzzPn2Z3i6yWKLrMyEIYchLA5iInKXWOttIid-ZwrqghARUIa1WhEZ1TRhVNo51tpNWVHLObo-02hvcdpa5chV0cEqdSaJAGAafFQOGRqmNIKZIrt9FvbOxLhPJQV_mnrkEzOWqSfaVf1_8F313TaxA</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Chen, Junling</creator><creator>Li, Jinwei</creator><creator>Wang, Dawei</creator><creator>Feng, Youquan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-6292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-4060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</title><author>Chen, Junling ; Li, Jinwei ; Wang, Dawei ; Feng, Youquan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steel tubes</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Youquan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of vibration and control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Junling</au><au>Li, Jinwei</au><au>Wang, Dawei</au><au>Feng, Youquan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vibration and control</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>17-18</issue><spage>2240</spage><epage>2253</epage><pages>2240-2253</pages><issn>1077-5463</issn><eissn>1741-2986</eissn><abstract>The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10775463211007592</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-6292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-4060</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1077-5463
ispartof Journal of vibration and control, 2022-09, Vol.28 (17-18), p.2240-2253
issn 1077-5463
1741-2986
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2703910186
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Dynamic response
Finite element method
Ground motion
Mathematical models
Segments
Seismic design
Seismic response
Steel
Steel tubes
Stiffness
Turbines
Wind power
Wind turbines
title Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20response%20analysis%20of%20steel%E2%80%93concrete%20hybrid%20wind%20turbine%20tower&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vibration%20and%20control&rft.au=Chen,%20Junling&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=17-18&rft.spage=2240&rft.epage=2253&rft.pages=2240-2253&rft.issn=1077-5463&rft.eissn=1741-2986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10775463211007592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2703910186%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703910186&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10775463211007592&rfr_iscdi=true