Loading…
Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower
The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of vibration and control 2022-09, Vol.28 (17-18), p.2240-2253 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3 |
container_end_page | 2253 |
container_issue | 17-18 |
container_start_page | 2240 |
container_title | Journal of vibration and control |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Chen, Junling Li, Jinwei Wang, Dawei Feng, Youquan |
description | The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10775463211007592 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2703910186</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10775463211007592</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2703910186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geetMkt00RylahYIHe1-yuxNNaTc12VL25jv4hj6JWyp4EE8zzHz_z8_P2DXCBFHrWwStc1VIgQigcyNO2Ai1wkyYaXE67MM_OwDn7CKlFQAohTBi8xfyaeNrHiltQ5uI29au--QTD46njmj99fFZh7aO1BF_66voG773bcO7Xax8S7wLe4qX7MzZdaKrnzlmy4f75ewxWzzPn2Z3i6yWKLrMyEIYchLA5iInKXWOttIid-ZwrqghARUIa1WhEZ1TRhVNo51tpNWVHLObo-02hvcdpa5chV0cEqdSaJAGAafFQOGRqmNIKZIrt9FvbOxLhPJQV_mnrkEzOWqSfaVf1_8F313TaxA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2703910186</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Chen, Junling ; Li, Jinwei ; Wang, Dawei ; Feng, Youquan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junling ; Li, Jinwei ; Wang, Dawei ; Feng, Youquan</creatorcontrib><description>The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1077-5463</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10775463211007592</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Dynamic response ; Finite element method ; Ground motion ; Mathematical models ; Segments ; Seismic design ; Seismic response ; Steel ; Steel tubes ; Stiffness ; Turbines ; Wind power ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Journal of vibration and control, 2022-09, Vol.28 (17-18), p.2240-2253</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0062-6292 ; 0000-0001-5745-4060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,79134</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Youquan</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</title><title>Journal of vibration and control</title><description>The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower.</description><subject>Dynamic response</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Seismic design</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Steel</subject><subject>Steel tubes</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>1077-5463</issn><issn>1741-2986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsP4C3geetMkt00RylahYIHe1-yuxNNaTc12VL25jv4hj6JWyp4EE8zzHz_z8_P2DXCBFHrWwStc1VIgQigcyNO2Ai1wkyYaXE67MM_OwDn7CKlFQAohTBi8xfyaeNrHiltQ5uI29au--QTD46njmj99fFZh7aO1BF_66voG773bcO7Xax8S7wLe4qX7MzZdaKrnzlmy4f75ewxWzzPn2Z3i6yWKLrMyEIYchLA5iInKXWOttIid-ZwrqghARUIa1WhEZ1TRhVNo51tpNWVHLObo-02hvcdpa5chV0cEqdSaJAGAafFQOGRqmNIKZIrt9FvbOxLhPJQV_mnrkEzOWqSfaVf1_8F313TaxA</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Chen, Junling</creator><creator>Li, Jinwei</creator><creator>Wang, Dawei</creator><creator>Feng, Youquan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-6292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-4060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</title><author>Chen, Junling ; Li, Jinwei ; Wang, Dawei ; Feng, Youquan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Dynamic response</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Seismic design</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Steel</topic><topic>Steel tubes</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Junling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jinwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Dawei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Youquan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of vibration and control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Junling</au><au>Li, Jinwei</au><au>Wang, Dawei</au><au>Feng, Youquan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vibration and control</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>17-18</issue><spage>2240</spage><epage>2253</epage><pages>2240-2253</pages><issn>1077-5463</issn><eissn>1741-2986</eissn><abstract>The steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower is characterized by the concrete tubular segment at the lower part and the traditional steel tubular segment at the upper part. Because of the great change of mass and stiffness along the height of the tower at the connection of steel segment and concrete segment, its dynamic responses under seismic ground motions are significantly different from those of the traditional steel tubular wind turbine tower. Two detailed finite element models of a full steel tubular tower and a steel–concrete hybrid tower for 2.0 MW wind turbine built in the same wind farm are, respectively, developed by using the finite element software ABAQUS. The response spectrum method is applied to analyze the seismic action effects of these two towers under three different ground types. Three groups of ground motions corresponding to three ground types are used to analyze the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower by the nonlinear time history method. The numerical results show that the seismic action effect by the response spectrum method is lower than those by the nonlinear time history method. And then it can be concluded that the response spectrum method is not suitable for calculating the seismic action effects of the steel–concrete hybrid tower directly and the time history analyses should be a necessary supplement for its seismic design. The first three modes have obvious contributions on the dynamic response of the steel–concrete hybrid tower.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10775463211007592</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0062-6292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-4060</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1077-5463 |
ispartof | Journal of vibration and control, 2022-09, Vol.28 (17-18), p.2240-2253 |
issn | 1077-5463 1741-2986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2703910186 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Dynamic response Finite element method Ground motion Mathematical models Segments Seismic design Seismic response Steel Steel tubes Stiffness Turbines Wind power Wind turbines |
title | Seismic response analysis of steel–concrete hybrid wind turbine tower |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20response%20analysis%20of%20steel%E2%80%93concrete%20hybrid%20wind%20turbine%20tower&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vibration%20and%20control&rft.au=Chen,%20Junling&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=17-18&rft.spage=2240&rft.epage=2253&rft.pages=2240-2253&rft.issn=1077-5463&rft.eissn=1741-2986&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10775463211007592&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2703910186%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-93629ef300a525e33751ab725f99ef3bede20b02aa46711ff4946dd7fad3a7b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2703910186&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10775463211007592&rfr_iscdi=true |