Loading…
Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis
Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biomass conversion and biorefinery 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.4061-4068 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973 |
container_end_page | 4068 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 4061 |
container_title | Biomass conversion and biorefinery |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves Medeiros, Nilson da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira Torres, Aldo Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio |
description | Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage (
Nopalea cochenillifera
and
Opuntia stricta
); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v
−1
solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L
−1
. After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L
-1
from
N. cochenillifera
and
O. stricta
biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2706754898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2706754898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxhdRULQv4Cng1dVJ0t003lT8B4IXPYc0mdhIN9EkFdY38K1NrejN0wzM75uZ72uaQwonFECcZsq5lC0waAFkDy3bavYYldD2M8a3f3va7TaTnF8AgHHBZxz2ms8LH7EsdIhL8pqiXZniYyAuxYEYbcoqE7PUNlokcx8HnfMZMTFkbzHpNZpJdGSh0zvm4sMzKX7AY2LTSAZdCqY1bTCUH_qY6GAJho-xjr0hi9GmuByzzwfNjtPLjJOfut88XV89Xt629w83d5fn963hVJbWubmgveskOsenyFAAl2CNRrDTDnswRsh5tQcVAomddcBFBc2UQi8F32-ONnur3bdV_Vq9xFUK9aRiAnrRTWdyVim2oUyKOSd06jX5QadRUVDr1NUmdVVTV9-pK1ZFfCPKFQ7PmP5W_6P6Ao6JiFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2706754898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves ; Medeiros, Nilson ; da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira ; Torres, Aldo ; Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano ; de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares ; Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar ; Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creator><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves ; Medeiros, Nilson ; da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira ; Torres, Aldo ; Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano ; de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares ; Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar ; Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creatorcontrib><description>Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage (
Nopalea cochenillifera
and
Opuntia stricta
); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v
−1
solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L
−1
. After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L
-1
from
N. cochenillifera
and
O. stricta
biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-6823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biofuels ; Biomass ; Biotechnology ; Diurnal variations ; Dry season ; Drying ; Energy ; Ethanol ; Fermentation ; Glucose ; Hydrolysis ; Original Article ; Rainy season ; Renewable and Green Energy</subject><ispartof>Biomass conversion and biorefinery, 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.4061-4068</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3245-2795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Nilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creatorcontrib><title>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</title><title>Biomass conversion and biorefinery</title><addtitle>Biomass Conv. Bioref</addtitle><description>Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage (
Nopalea cochenillifera
and
Opuntia stricta
); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v
−1
solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L
−1
. After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L
-1
from
N. cochenillifera
and
O. stricta
biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process.</description><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Diurnal variations</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Renewable and Green Energy</subject><issn>2190-6815</issn><issn>2190-6823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxhdRULQv4Cng1dVJ0t003lT8B4IXPYc0mdhIN9EkFdY38K1NrejN0wzM75uZ72uaQwonFECcZsq5lC0waAFkDy3bavYYldD2M8a3f3va7TaTnF8AgHHBZxz2ms8LH7EsdIhL8pqiXZniYyAuxYEYbcoqE7PUNlokcx8HnfMZMTFkbzHpNZpJdGSh0zvm4sMzKX7AY2LTSAZdCqY1bTCUH_qY6GAJho-xjr0hi9GmuByzzwfNjtPLjJOfut88XV89Xt629w83d5fn963hVJbWubmgveskOsenyFAAl2CNRrDTDnswRsh5tQcVAomddcBFBc2UQi8F32-ONnur3bdV_Vq9xFUK9aRiAnrRTWdyVim2oUyKOSd06jX5QadRUVDr1NUmdVVTV9-pK1ZFfCPKFQ7PmP5W_6P6Ao6JiFQ</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</creator><creator>Medeiros, Nilson</creator><creator>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</creator><creator>Torres, Aldo</creator><creator>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</creator><creator>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</creator><creator>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</creator><creator>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-2795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</title><author>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves ; Medeiros, Nilson ; da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira ; Torres, Aldo ; Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano ; de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares ; Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar ; Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Diurnal variations</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Renewable and Green Energy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Nilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Biomass conversion and biorefinery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</au><au>Medeiros, Nilson</au><au>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</au><au>Torres, Aldo</au><au>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</au><au>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</au><au>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</au><au>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</atitle><jtitle>Biomass conversion and biorefinery</jtitle><stitle>Biomass Conv. Bioref</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4061</spage><epage>4068</epage><pages>4061-4068</pages><issn>2190-6815</issn><eissn>2190-6823</eissn><abstract>Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage (
Nopalea cochenillifera
and
Opuntia stricta
); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v
−1
solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L
−1
. After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h;
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L
-1
from
N. cochenillifera
and
O. stricta
biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-2795</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2190-6815 |
ispartof | Biomass conversion and biorefinery, 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.4061-4068 |
issn | 2190-6815 2190-6823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2706754898 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Biofuels Biomass Biotechnology Diurnal variations Dry season Drying Energy Ethanol Fermentation Glucose Hydrolysis Original Article Rainy season Renewable and Green Energy |
title | Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioethanol%20production%20from%20cactus%20cladode%20biomass:%20considerations%20of%20harvesting%20time,%20dry%20matter%20concentrations,%20and%20enzymatic%20hydrolysis&rft.jtitle=Biomass%20conversion%20and%20biorefinery&rft.au=Alencar,%20B%C3%A1rbara%20Ribeiro%20Alves&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4061&rft.epage=4068&rft.pages=4061-4068&rft.issn=2190-6815&rft.eissn=2190-6823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2706754898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2706754898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |