Loading…

Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis

Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biomass conversion and biorefinery 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.4061-4068
Main Authors: Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves, Medeiros, Nilson, da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira, Torres, Aldo, Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano, de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares, Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar, Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973
container_end_page 4068
container_issue 9
container_start_page 4061
container_title Biomass conversion and biorefinery
container_volume 12
creator Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves
Medeiros, Nilson
da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira
Torres, Aldo
Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano
de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares
Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar
Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio
description Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage ( Nopalea cochenillifera and Opuntia stricta ); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v −1 solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L −1 . After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L -1 from N. cochenillifera and O. stricta biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2706754898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2706754898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxhdRULQv4Cng1dVJ0t003lT8B4IXPYc0mdhIN9EkFdY38K1NrejN0wzM75uZ72uaQwonFECcZsq5lC0waAFkDy3bavYYldD2M8a3f3va7TaTnF8AgHHBZxz2ms8LH7EsdIhL8pqiXZniYyAuxYEYbcoqE7PUNlokcx8HnfMZMTFkbzHpNZpJdGSh0zvm4sMzKX7AY2LTSAZdCqY1bTCUH_qY6GAJho-xjr0hi9GmuByzzwfNjtPLjJOfut88XV89Xt629w83d5fn963hVJbWubmgveskOsenyFAAl2CNRrDTDnswRsh5tQcVAomddcBFBc2UQi8F32-ONnur3bdV_Vq9xFUK9aRiAnrRTWdyVim2oUyKOSd06jX5QadRUVDr1NUmdVVTV9-pK1ZFfCPKFQ7PmP5W_6P6Ao6JiFQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2706754898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves ; Medeiros, Nilson ; da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira ; Torres, Aldo ; Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano ; de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares ; Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar ; Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creator><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves ; Medeiros, Nilson ; da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira ; Torres, Aldo ; Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano ; de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares ; Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar ; Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creatorcontrib><description>Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage ( Nopalea cochenillifera and Opuntia stricta ); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v −1 solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L −1 . After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L -1 from N. cochenillifera and O. stricta biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2190-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2190-6823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biofuels ; Biomass ; Biotechnology ; Diurnal variations ; Dry season ; Drying ; Energy ; Ethanol ; Fermentation ; Glucose ; Hydrolysis ; Original Article ; Rainy season ; Renewable and Green Energy</subject><ispartof>Biomass conversion and biorefinery, 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.4061-4068</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3245-2795</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Nilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creatorcontrib><title>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</title><title>Biomass conversion and biorefinery</title><addtitle>Biomass Conv. Bioref</addtitle><description>Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage ( Nopalea cochenillifera and Opuntia stricta ); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v −1 solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L −1 . After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L -1 from N. cochenillifera and O. stricta biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process.</description><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Diurnal variations</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Glucose</subject><subject>Hydrolysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Rainy season</subject><subject>Renewable and Green Energy</subject><issn>2190-6815</issn><issn>2190-6823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KAzEQxhdRULQv4Cng1dVJ0t003lT8B4IXPYc0mdhIN9EkFdY38K1NrejN0wzM75uZ72uaQwonFECcZsq5lC0waAFkDy3bavYYldD2M8a3f3va7TaTnF8AgHHBZxz2ms8LH7EsdIhL8pqiXZniYyAuxYEYbcoqE7PUNlokcx8HnfMZMTFkbzHpNZpJdGSh0zvm4sMzKX7AY2LTSAZdCqY1bTCUH_qY6GAJho-xjr0hi9GmuByzzwfNjtPLjJOfut88XV89Xt629w83d5fn963hVJbWubmgveskOsenyFAAl2CNRrDTDnswRsh5tQcVAomddcBFBc2UQi8F32-ONnur3bdV_Vq9xFUK9aRiAnrRTWdyVim2oUyKOSd06jX5QadRUVDr1NUmdVVTV9-pK1ZFfCPKFQ7PmP5W_6P6Ao6JiFQ</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</creator><creator>Medeiros, Nilson</creator><creator>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</creator><creator>Torres, Aldo</creator><creator>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</creator><creator>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</creator><creator>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</creator><creator>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-2795</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</title><author>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves ; Medeiros, Nilson ; da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira ; Torres, Aldo ; Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano ; de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares ; Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar ; Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Diurnal variations</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Glucose</topic><topic>Hydrolysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Rainy season</topic><topic>Renewable and Green Energy</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medeiros, Nilson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Torres, Aldo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Biomass conversion and biorefinery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alencar, Bárbara Ribeiro Alves</au><au>Medeiros, Nilson</au><au>da Silva, Carolaine Larissa Lira</au><au>Torres, Aldo</au><au>Dutra, Emmanuel Damilano</au><au>de Sá Barreto Sampaio, Everardo Valadares</au><au>Menezes, Rômulo Simões Cezar</au><au>Morais Júnior, Marcos Antônio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis</atitle><jtitle>Biomass conversion and biorefinery</jtitle><stitle>Biomass Conv. Bioref</stitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4061</spage><epage>4068</epage><pages>4061-4068</pages><issn>2190-6815</issn><eissn>2190-6823</eissn><abstract>Cactus pear biomass has the potential for bioethanol production in dry regions. However, its low solids concentration and pH variations may hinder the process of alcoholic fermentation. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to evaluate the effects of harvest time and season on biomass pH and dry matter concentration of cladodes of two cactus pear species commonly used as forage ( Nopalea cochenillifera and Opuntia stricta ); (2) to compare the hydrolysis of fresh and dried biomass (10% w v −1 solids); (3) to compare increasing periods of two temperatures (65 °C or 105 °C) to concentrate the biomass to 10% and 30% solids; and (4) to perform enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of biomass dried to 30% solids. Biomass pH ranged from 3.0 to 5.6, from early morning to late afternoon, with higher diurnal variation during the dry season, when their solids concentrations were higher than in the rainy season (12–16% × 7–10%). Hydrolyzed fresh and dried biomass had similar glucose, xylose, and galacturonic acid concentrations. Drying at 105 °C for 12 h was the best temperature and period to reach 30% of solids. The enzymatic hydrolysis of the biomass dried to 30% solids yielded 65.3 and 80.0 g of glucose L −1 . After fermentations (33 °C; 8 h; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ), ethanol was produced to 29.4 and 37.5 g L -1 from N. cochenillifera and O. stricta biomasses, respectively. Therefore, early morning during the dry season is the best moment to harvest the cladodes, whose biomass can be partially dried at 105 °C for 12 h to 30% solids load before being hydrolyzed and fermented for bioethanol production. This procedure reduces the time, energy, and inputs needed in the process.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3245-2795</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2190-6815
ispartof Biomass conversion and biorefinery, 2022-09, Vol.12 (9), p.4061-4068
issn 2190-6815
2190-6823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2706754898
source Springer Link
subjects Biofuels
Biomass
Biotechnology
Diurnal variations
Dry season
Drying
Energy
Ethanol
Fermentation
Glucose
Hydrolysis
Original Article
Rainy season
Renewable and Green Energy
title Bioethanol production from cactus cladode biomass: considerations of harvesting time, dry matter concentrations, and enzymatic hydrolysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T06%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bioethanol%20production%20from%20cactus%20cladode%20biomass:%20considerations%20of%20harvesting%20time,%20dry%20matter%20concentrations,%20and%20enzymatic%20hydrolysis&rft.jtitle=Biomass%20conversion%20and%20biorefinery&rft.au=Alencar,%20B%C3%A1rbara%20Ribeiro%20Alves&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4061&rft.epage=4068&rft.pages=4061-4068&rft.issn=2190-6815&rft.eissn=2190-6823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13399-020-00960-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2706754898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-ffb716f59eff34e2e70390dcae0d45e60cc79b37306f509e5df0374e2c4106973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2706754898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true