Welfare gains in the Armington, Krugman and Melitz models: Comparisons grounded on gravity

Under a wide range of model features, we show that in response to a reduction in global trade costs, the global welfare gains are largest in the Melitz model, followed by the Krugman model, and smallest in Armington. Labor‐leisure choice and intermediate goods are the most important features for dif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economic inquiry 2022-10, Vol.60 (4), p.1681-1703
Main Authors: Balistreri, Edward J., Tarr, David G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Gravity
heterogeneous firms
Leisure
monopolistic competition
multi‐sector Feenstra ratio
optimal tariff
Protectionism
structural gravity
Welfare
welfare comparisons
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Under a wide range of model features, we show that in response to a reduction in global trade costs, the global welfare gains are largest in the Melitz model, followed by the Krugman model, and smallest in Armington. Labor‐leisure choice and intermediate goods are the most important features for differentiating results. We show that the optimal tariff is significantly lower in the monopolistic competition models, thereby moving policy away from protectionism. We are the first to consider multi‐sector comparative‐static welfare impacts of these market structures, while maintaining equal trade responses across the models consistent with a shared structural‐gravity elasticity.
ISSN:0095-2583
1465-7295
DOI:10.1111/ecin.13082