Loading…
Safety of Quinolones in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background The results of animal experiments show that quinolone antibacterial drugs may permanently damage the soft tissues of the weight-bearing joints of young animals. Out of safety concerns, using quinolones in children has always been controversial. Objective The aim of this study was to asses...
Saved in:
Published in: | Paediatric drugs 2022-09, Vol.24 (5), p.447-464 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
The results of animal experiments show that quinolone antibacterial drugs may permanently damage the soft tissues of the weight-bearing joints of young animals. Out of safety concerns, using quinolones in children has always been controversial.
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the risk of using quinolones in children and provide evidence for clinicians to support decision making.
Data Sources
The MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (Ovid), CINAHL, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data databases were searched from inception to 8 September 2021.
Study Selection
All types of studies that reported the safety data of quinolones in children, including clinical trials and observational studies.
Data Extraction
Data extraction and cross-checking were completed by two independent reviewers using a pilot-tested standardized data extraction form.
Results
The overall incidence rate of adverse drug events (ADEs) in children using systemic quinolones was 5.39% and the most common ADEs were gastrointestinal reactions (incidence rate, 2.02%). Quinolone-induced musculoskeletal ADEs in children were uncommon (0.76%). Meta-analysis results showed that the risk of musculoskeletal ADEs in children using quinolones was higher than children in the control group (51 studies; rate ratio [RR] 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82–2.26;
p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1174-5878 1179-2019 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s40272-022-00513-2 |