The Two Sides of Cognitive Masking: A Three-Level Bayesian Meta-Analysis on Twice-Exceptionality

We compared the Wechsler scores of individuals with twice-exceptionality (2e) and giftedness using a three-level Bayesian meta-analysis. Ninety-five effect sizes were calculated from 15 studies (n = 2,106). Results show that individuals with 2e who have learning disabilities perform lower than indiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Gifted child quarterly 2022-10, Vol.66 (4), p.277-295
Main Authors: Atmaca, Furkan, Baloğlu, Mustafa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adults
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian Statistics
Children
Cognitive Processes
Comparative Analysis
Dyslexia
Effect Size
Exceptional children
Gifted
Gifted Disabled
Gifted education
Identification
Intelligence Quotient
Intelligence Tests
Learning Disabilities
Meta Analysis
Scores
Short Term Memory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9c6752facccf3536fadf36f0fd9d1f58802de1ace2c040db6c4b4f92fc3404833
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9c6752facccf3536fadf36f0fd9d1f58802de1ace2c040db6c4b4f92fc3404833
container_end_page 295
container_issue 4
container_start_page 277
container_title The Gifted child quarterly
container_volume 66
creator Atmaca, Furkan
Baloğlu, Mustafa
description We compared the Wechsler scores of individuals with twice-exceptionality (2e) and giftedness using a three-level Bayesian meta-analysis. Ninety-five effect sizes were calculated from 15 studies (n = 2,106). Results show that individuals with 2e who have learning disabilities perform lower than individuals with giftedness in Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ; g = −0.62), working memory (g = −0.79), and processing speed (g = −0.75). Individuals with 2e who have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have a distinct profile in which only processing speed differs from individuals with giftedness (g = −0.55). Results suggest that using a single Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score in the identification process will be misleading. Moreover, IQ may mask the strengths or weaknesses of individuals with 2e.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00169862221110875
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2711757310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1350310</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_00169862221110875</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2711757310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9c6752facccf3536fadf36f0fd9d1f58802de1ace2c040db6c4b4f92fc3404833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-ABcmTVwX-5qXOyTgIxAXjuuxdG6hiDPYDuj8e0vG6MK4uc3N-c65zUHonNEBY0lyRSmLszTmnDPGaJpEB6jHMiFJRiU7RL29TvbAMTrxfhXWNOO0h17yJeD8o8ZPtgSPa4NH9aKyjd0Bnin_aqvFNR7ifOkAyBR2sMY3qgVvVYVn0CgyrNS69TZYq5BjNZDxp4ZNY-sg2KY9RUdGrT2cfb999DwZ56M7Mn28vR8Np0TzWDYk03EScaO01kZEIjaqNGFSU2YlM1GaUl4CUxq4ppKW81jLuTQZN1pIKlMh-uiyy924-n0LvilW9daFP_iCJ6GiKBGMBop1lHa19w5MsXH2Tbm2YLTYF1n8KTJ4LjoPOKt_-PEDExHtMged7tUCfq_-H_gFJot7uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2711757310</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Two Sides of Cognitive Masking: A Three-Level Bayesian Meta-Analysis on Twice-Exceptionality</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Atmaca, Furkan ; Baloğlu, Mustafa</creator><creatorcontrib>Atmaca, Furkan ; Baloğlu, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the Wechsler scores of individuals with twice-exceptionality (2e) and giftedness using a three-level Bayesian meta-analysis. Ninety-five effect sizes were calculated from 15 studies (n = 2,106). Results show that individuals with 2e who have learning disabilities perform lower than individuals with giftedness in Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ; g = −0.62), working memory (g = −0.79), and processing speed (g = −0.75). Individuals with 2e who have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have a distinct profile in which only processing speed differs from individuals with giftedness (g = −0.55). Results suggest that using a single Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score in the identification process will be misleading. Moreover, IQ may mask the strengths or weaknesses of individuals with 2e.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-9862</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-9041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00169862221110875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adults ; Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian Statistics ; Children ; Cognitive Processes ; Comparative Analysis ; Dyslexia ; Effect Size ; Exceptional children ; Gifted ; Gifted Disabled ; Gifted education ; Identification ; Intelligence Quotient ; Intelligence Tests ; Learning Disabilities ; Meta Analysis ; Scores ; Short Term Memory</subject><ispartof>The Gifted child quarterly, 2022-10, Vol.66 (4), p.277-295</ispartof><rights>2022 National Association for Gifted Children</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9c6752facccf3536fadf36f0fd9d1f58802de1ace2c040db6c4b4f92fc3404833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9c6752facccf3536fadf36f0fd9d1f58802de1ace2c040db6c4b4f92fc3404833</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0937-1839</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1350310$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atmaca, Furkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baloğlu, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><title>The Two Sides of Cognitive Masking: A Three-Level Bayesian Meta-Analysis on Twice-Exceptionality</title><title>The Gifted child quarterly</title><description>We compared the Wechsler scores of individuals with twice-exceptionality (2e) and giftedness using a three-level Bayesian meta-analysis. Ninety-five effect sizes were calculated from 15 studies (n = 2,106). Results show that individuals with 2e who have learning disabilities perform lower than individuals with giftedness in Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ; g = −0.62), working memory (g = −0.79), and processing speed (g = −0.75). Individuals with 2e who have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have a distinct profile in which only processing speed differs from individuals with giftedness (g = −0.55). Results suggest that using a single Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score in the identification process will be misleading. Moreover, IQ may mask the strengths or weaknesses of individuals with 2e.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian Statistics</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Dyslexia</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Exceptional children</subject><subject>Gifted</subject><subject>Gifted Disabled</subject><subject>Gifted education</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Intelligence Quotient</subject><subject>Intelligence Tests</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Short Term Memory</subject><issn>0016-9862</issn><issn>1934-9041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPAjEUhRujiYj-ABcmTVwX-5qXOyTgIxAXjuuxdG6hiDPYDuj8e0vG6MK4uc3N-c65zUHonNEBY0lyRSmLszTmnDPGaJpEB6jHMiFJRiU7RL29TvbAMTrxfhXWNOO0h17yJeD8o8ZPtgSPa4NH9aKyjd0Bnin_aqvFNR7ifOkAyBR2sMY3qgVvVYVn0CgyrNS69TZYq5BjNZDxp4ZNY-sg2KY9RUdGrT2cfb999DwZ56M7Mn28vR8Np0TzWDYk03EScaO01kZEIjaqNGFSU2YlM1GaUl4CUxq4ppKW81jLuTQZN1pIKlMh-uiyy924-n0LvilW9daFP_iCJ6GiKBGMBop1lHa19w5MsXH2Tbm2YLTYF1n8KTJ4LjoPOKt_-PEDExHtMged7tUCfq_-H_gFJot7uw</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Atmaca, Furkan</creator><creator>Baloğlu, Mustafa</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4T-</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-1839</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>The Two Sides of Cognitive Masking: A Three-Level Bayesian Meta-Analysis on Twice-Exceptionality</title><author>Atmaca, Furkan ; Baloğlu, Mustafa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9c6752facccf3536fadf36f0fd9d1f58802de1ace2c040db6c4b4f92fc3404833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian Statistics</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Dyslexia</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Exceptional children</topic><topic>Gifted</topic><topic>Gifted Disabled</topic><topic>Gifted education</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Intelligence Quotient</topic><topic>Intelligence Tests</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Short Term Memory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atmaca, Furkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baloğlu, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><jtitle>The Gifted child quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atmaca, Furkan</au><au>Baloğlu, Mustafa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1350310</ericid><atitle>The Two Sides of Cognitive Masking: A Three-Level Bayesian Meta-Analysis on Twice-Exceptionality</atitle><jtitle>The Gifted child quarterly</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>277-295</pages><issn>0016-9862</issn><eissn>1934-9041</eissn><abstract>We compared the Wechsler scores of individuals with twice-exceptionality (2e) and giftedness using a three-level Bayesian meta-analysis. Ninety-five effect sizes were calculated from 15 studies (n = 2,106). Results show that individuals with 2e who have learning disabilities perform lower than individuals with giftedness in Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient (FSIQ; g = −0.62), working memory (g = −0.79), and processing speed (g = −0.75). Individuals with 2e who have attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder have a distinct profile in which only processing speed differs from individuals with giftedness (g = −0.55). Results suggest that using a single Intelligence Quotient (IQ) score in the identification process will be misleading. Moreover, IQ may mask the strengths or weaknesses of individuals with 2e.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00169862221110875</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0937-1839</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-9862
ispartof The Gifted child quarterly, 2022-10, Vol.66 (4), p.277-295
issn 0016-9862
1934-9041
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2711757310
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list); ERIC
subjects Adults
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian Statistics
Children
Cognitive Processes
Comparative Analysis
Dyslexia
Effect Size
Exceptional children
Gifted
Gifted Disabled
Gifted education
Identification
Intelligence Quotient
Intelligence Tests
Learning Disabilities
Meta Analysis
Scores
Short Term Memory
title The Two Sides of Cognitive Masking: A Three-Level Bayesian Meta-Analysis on Twice-Exceptionality
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T15%3A38%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Two%20Sides%20of%20Cognitive%20Masking:%20A%20Three-Level%20Bayesian%20Meta-Analysis%20on%20Twice-Exceptionality&rft.jtitle=The%20Gifted%20child%20quarterly&rft.au=Atmaca,%20Furkan&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=277-295&rft.issn=0016-9862&rft.eissn=1934-9041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00169862221110875&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2711757310%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-9c6752facccf3536fadf36f0fd9d1f58802de1ace2c040db6c4b4f92fc3404833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2711757310&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1350310&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00169862221110875&rfr_iscdi=true