“Agreement Builds and Disagreement Destroys:” How Polish Undergraduates and Graduates Understand Interpersonal Arguing

• Published in: Argumentation 2022-09, Vol.36 (3), p.365-392
• Main Authors: Dębowska-Kozłowska, Kamila, Hample, Dale
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: College students; Communication Studies; Education; Gender differences; Legal History; Logic; Original Research; Philosophy; Philosophy of Law; Political Communication; Theories of Law
• ISSN: 0920-427X; 1572-8374
• DOI: 10.1007/s10503-022-09570-w

This is a descriptive study ( N  = 243) of how Polish undergraduates and graduates perceive face to face arguing. We had some reasons to suppose that they would not be especially aggressive. The Polish culture has a number of proverbs warning against combative arguing, with “agreement builds and disagreement destroys” being illustrative. In addition, up until 1989 public dissent and open disagreements were suppressed by the government, and older generations often found it prudent to avoid arguing. We compared Polish results with previously reported data from the U.S. and Ukraine. We did, in fact, find that Polish orientations were less aggressive and more other-oriented than the two comparison nations. We also discovered Poland was more wary of engaging in interpersonal conflicts. Distinct sex differences appeared when we compared Polish men and women, with men being more forceful. Correlational patterns, especially concerning argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness, were largely consistent with those originally found in the U.S. Power distance continues to have important connections with the standard argument orientation measures, but its patterns of correlation are not entirely consistent across the relatively small number of nations where the variable has been studied.