Loading…

Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice

The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist crit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Sociological review (Keele) 2022-09, Vol.70 (5), p.1044-1061
Main Authors: Sauerborn, Elgen, Sökefeld, Nina, Neckel, Sighard
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223
container_end_page 1061
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1044
container_title The Sociological review (Keele)
container_volume 70
creator Sauerborn, Elgen
Sökefeld, Nina
Neckel, Sighard
description The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/00380261221108570
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2714848120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00380261221108570</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2714848120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuC6465aV51J4NPBnQxgruS5qEdpk1NWtB_b4YKLsTVXZzvnHs4CJ0DXgIIcYlxKTHhQAgAlkzgA5QB5aKoGH09RNleL_bAMTqJcYsxBsJFhh6fVVDGf9qYe5d3bW_ctOttjFf55t3mcbC69VPMh-C7Ns6UyrXvR9sNPqjwlSSlx1bbU3Tk1C7as5-7QC-3N5vVfbF-untYXa8LTSQbC244l7ppnMGVoxUI3hiDqSsdY5Srhllb8bKxRCoQjLvGEUMFJFmKihNSLtDFnJs6fUw2jvXWT6FPL2sigEoqgeBEwUzp4GMM1tVDaLvUtwZc7yer_0yWPMvZE9Wb_U393_ANKOhrIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714848120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Sauerborn, Elgen ; Sökefeld, Nina ; Neckel, Sighard</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauerborn, Elgen ; Sökefeld, Nina ; Neckel, Sighard</creatorcontrib><description>The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-954X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00380261221108570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access ; Ethnography ; Fieldwork ; Mindfulness ; Neoliberalism ; Optimization ; Popularity ; Social change ; Social problems ; Teachers ; Technology</subject><ispartof>The Sociological review (Keele), 2022-09, Vol.70 (5), p.1044-1061</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauerborn, Elgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sökefeld, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neckel, Sighard</creatorcontrib><title>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</title><title>The Sociological review (Keele)</title><description>The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Mindfulness</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0038-0261</issn><issn>1467-954X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuC6465aV51J4NPBnQxgruS5qEdpk1NWtB_b4YKLsTVXZzvnHs4CJ0DXgIIcYlxKTHhQAgAlkzgA5QB5aKoGH09RNleL_bAMTqJcYsxBsJFhh6fVVDGf9qYe5d3bW_ctOttjFf55t3mcbC69VPMh-C7Ns6UyrXvR9sNPqjwlSSlx1bbU3Tk1C7as5-7QC-3N5vVfbF-untYXa8LTSQbC244l7ppnMGVoxUI3hiDqSsdY5Srhllb8bKxRCoQjLvGEUMFJFmKihNSLtDFnJs6fUw2jvXWT6FPL2sigEoqgeBEwUzp4GMM1tVDaLvUtwZc7yer_0yWPMvZE9Wb_U393_ANKOhrIg</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Sauerborn, Elgen</creator><creator>Sökefeld, Nina</creator><creator>Neckel, Sighard</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</title><author>Sauerborn, Elgen ; Sökefeld, Nina ; Neckel, Sighard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Mindfulness</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauerborn, Elgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sökefeld, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neckel, Sighard</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Sociological review (Keele)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauerborn, Elgen</au><au>Sökefeld, Nina</au><au>Neckel, Sighard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</atitle><jtitle>The Sociological review (Keele)</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1044</spage><epage>1061</epage><pages>1044-1061</pages><issn>0038-0261</issn><eissn>1467-954X</eissn><abstract>The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00380261221108570</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0261
ispartof The Sociological review (Keele), 2022-09, Vol.70 (5), p.1044-1061
issn 0038-0261
1467-954X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2714848120
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Access
Ethnography
Fieldwork
Mindfulness
Neoliberalism
Optimization
Popularity
Social change
Social problems
Teachers
Technology
title Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A37%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paradoxes%20of%20mindfulness:%20The%20specious%20promises%20of%20a%20contemporary%20practice&rft.jtitle=The%20Sociological%20review%20(Keele)&rft.au=Sauerborn,%20Elgen&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1044&rft.epage=1061&rft.pages=1044-1061&rft.issn=0038-0261&rft.eissn=1467-954X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00380261221108570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714848120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714848120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00380261221108570&rfr_iscdi=true