Loading…
Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice
The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist crit...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Sociological review (Keele) 2022-09, Vol.70 (5), p.1044-1061 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223 |
container_end_page | 1061 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1044 |
container_title | The Sociological review (Keele) |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Sauerborn, Elgen Sökefeld, Nina Neckel, Sighard |
description | The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00380261221108570 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2714848120</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00380261221108570</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2714848120</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuC6465aV51J4NPBnQxgruS5qEdpk1NWtB_b4YKLsTVXZzvnHs4CJ0DXgIIcYlxKTHhQAgAlkzgA5QB5aKoGH09RNleL_bAMTqJcYsxBsJFhh6fVVDGf9qYe5d3bW_ctOttjFf55t3mcbC69VPMh-C7Ns6UyrXvR9sNPqjwlSSlx1bbU3Tk1C7as5-7QC-3N5vVfbF-untYXa8LTSQbC244l7ppnMGVoxUI3hiDqSsdY5Srhllb8bKxRCoQjLvGEUMFJFmKihNSLtDFnJs6fUw2jvXWT6FPL2sigEoqgeBEwUzp4GMM1tVDaLvUtwZc7yer_0yWPMvZE9Wb_U393_ANKOhrIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2714848120</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Sauerborn, Elgen ; Sökefeld, Nina ; Neckel, Sighard</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauerborn, Elgen ; Sökefeld, Nina ; Neckel, Sighard</creatorcontrib><description>The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-954X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00380261221108570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access ; Ethnography ; Fieldwork ; Mindfulness ; Neoliberalism ; Optimization ; Popularity ; Social change ; Social problems ; Teachers ; Technology</subject><ispartof>The Sociological review (Keele), 2022-09, Vol.70 (5), p.1044-1061</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauerborn, Elgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sökefeld, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neckel, Sighard</creatorcontrib><title>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</title><title>The Sociological review (Keele)</title><description>The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Fieldwork</subject><subject>Mindfulness</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Social change</subject><subject>Social problems</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0038-0261</issn><issn>1467-954X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLxDAUhYMoWEd_gLuC6465aV51J4NPBnQxgruS5qEdpk1NWtB_b4YKLsTVXZzvnHs4CJ0DXgIIcYlxKTHhQAgAlkzgA5QB5aKoGH09RNleL_bAMTqJcYsxBsJFhh6fVVDGf9qYe5d3bW_ctOttjFf55t3mcbC69VPMh-C7Ns6UyrXvR9sNPqjwlSSlx1bbU3Tk1C7as5-7QC-3N5vVfbF-untYXa8LTSQbC244l7ppnMGVoxUI3hiDqSsdY5Srhllb8bKxRCoQjLvGEUMFJFmKihNSLtDFnJs6fUw2jvXWT6FPL2sigEoqgeBEwUzp4GMM1tVDaLvUtwZc7yer_0yWPMvZE9Wb_U393_ANKOhrIg</recordid><startdate>202209</startdate><enddate>202209</enddate><creator>Sauerborn, Elgen</creator><creator>Sökefeld, Nina</creator><creator>Neckel, Sighard</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202209</creationdate><title>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</title><author>Sauerborn, Elgen ; Sökefeld, Nina ; Neckel, Sighard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Fieldwork</topic><topic>Mindfulness</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Social change</topic><topic>Social problems</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauerborn, Elgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sökefeld, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neckel, Sighard</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Sociological review (Keele)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauerborn, Elgen</au><au>Sökefeld, Nina</au><au>Neckel, Sighard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice</atitle><jtitle>The Sociological review (Keele)</jtitle><date>2022-09</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1044</spage><epage>1061</epage><pages>1044-1061</pages><issn>0038-0261</issn><eissn>1467-954X</eissn><abstract>The growing popularity of Western secular mindfulness programs in recent decades has frequently been criticized by sociologists. Mindfulness in this line of argument is viewed as the quintessential neoliberal and capitalist technology of the self. However, this – quite justified – functionalist critique does not account for how mindfulness is increasingly being used to escape growth driven-based optimization pressure. We therefore show, on the basis of our extensive empirical field research, how mindfulness is negotiated as a response to contemporary crises and social change, how this phenomenon can be understood as a symptomatic, contemporary cultural phenomenon. From our ethnographic data from 121 hours of participant observation in mindfulness courses in Germany and six interviews with mindfulness teachers, as well as analysis of relevant literature, we reconstruct four paradoxes of mindfulness. With reference to this, we show to what extent mindfulness is a program of specious promises. For in the final analysis, the broad accessibility and popularity of the program are based on the fact that its application is just as paradoxical as the social problems to which it promises to be a solution.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00380261221108570</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0038-0261 |
ispartof | The Sociological review (Keele), 2022-09, Vol.70 (5), p.1044-1061 |
issn | 0038-0261 1467-954X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2714848120 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Access Ethnography Fieldwork Mindfulness Neoliberalism Optimization Popularity Social change Social problems Teachers Technology |
title | Paradoxes of mindfulness: The specious promises of a contemporary practice |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A37%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paradoxes%20of%20mindfulness:%20The%20specious%20promises%20of%20a%20contemporary%20practice&rft.jtitle=The%20Sociological%20review%20(Keele)&rft.au=Sauerborn,%20Elgen&rft.date=2022-09&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1044&rft.epage=1061&rft.pages=1044-1061&rft.issn=0038-0261&rft.eissn=1467-954X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00380261221108570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2714848120%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c285t-6d668cbbfd09f49176bdd04f3f5546ab5ee963be28a1756fbf2d4713f58796223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2714848120&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00380261221108570&rfr_iscdi=true |