Worth the Effort? Comparing Different YouTube Vlog Production Styles in Terms of Viewers' Identification, Parasocial Response, Immersion, and Enjoyment

In recent years, online video blogs (vlogs) have become a highly popular form of media content, especially among younger audiences. While public interest has invoked a strong commercialization of vlog culture, research suggests that the concurrent loss of performer authenticity might pose a problem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts creativity, and the arts, 2022-08, Vol.16 (3), p.426-436
Main Authors: Stein, Jan-Philipp, Koban, Kevin, Joos, Sarah, Ohler, Peter
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Blog
Blogs
Commercialization
Comparative analysis
Digital Video
Female
Human
Identification
Male
Parasocial Interaction
Pleasure
Responses
Test Construction
User experience
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In recent years, online video blogs (vlogs) have become a highly popular form of media content, especially among younger audiences. While public interest has invoked a strong commercialization of vlog culture, research suggests that the concurrent loss of performer authenticity might pose a problem for the genre's appeal. Preparing the same vlog content in unedited ("amateur") and heavily produced ("professional") versions for an online experiment, we compare the viewing experience of 154 participants in terms of identification, parasocial responses, immersion, and enjoyment. Regarding most of these variables, we observe that the evaluations for the professionally produced vlog turn out much more favorable. Interestingly, the uncovered effects remain independent of the vlog's thematic focus, which is explored as an additional factor in our experiment. Concluding our statistical analyses, we report the results of an exploratory mediation analysis connecting the measured media psychological constructs.
ISSN:1931-3896
1931-390X
DOI:10.1037/aca0000374