Loading…

School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains

Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of positive behavior interventions 2022-10, Vol.24 (4), p.266-277
Main Authors: Briesch, Amy M., Chafouleas, Sandra M., Dineen, Jennifer N., McCoach, D. Betsy, Donaldson, Aberdine
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753
container_end_page 277
container_issue 4
container_start_page 266
container_title Journal of positive behavior interventions
container_volume 24
creator Briesch, Amy M.
Chafouleas, Sandra M.
Dineen, Jennifer N.
McCoach, D. Betsy
Donaldson, Aberdine
description Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10983007211003335
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2715206566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1350214</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_10983007211003335</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2715206566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAdhwaupu9l_ybGt1SoFxeo5bDeTdkuSrbup4Lc3MaIH8fQG3u_NMA-hc0pGlCp1TUmaMEJUTCkhjDFxgAZUsCTiSsWH7dz6UQcco5MQtoQQKSUdoHJpNs6VeLK3ZW7rNR7nla1taLxunMfPsHO-CdgVeGk8QN0hT16bxhoIeGy8C53oHCprrvAENvrdOq_LK6zrHM9Bl80G37hK2zqcoqNClwHOvnWIXm9nL9N5tHi8u5-OF5FhjDeRTAiVuUphxUHRVKeSJQzyQhNhQILgq6L9TMiCSSaU0MAEpybmXBQJZ0qwIbrs9-68e9tDaLKt2_u6PZnFioqYSCFlS9Ge-nrCQ5HtvK20_8goybpSsz-ltpmLPgPemh9-9kCZIDHlrT_q_aDX8Hv1_4Wf2RN-8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715206566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Briesch, Amy M. ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Dineen, Jennifer N. ; McCoach, D. Betsy ; Donaldson, Aberdine</creator><creatorcontrib>Briesch, Amy M. ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Dineen, Jennifer N. ; McCoach, D. Betsy ; Donaldson, Aberdine</creatorcontrib><description>Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10983007211003335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Administrator Evaluation ; Administrator Role ; Assistant Principals ; At Risk Students ; Best Practices ; Data Use ; Disability Identification ; Educational Practices ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Emotional Problems ; Health ; Incidence ; Interpersonal Competence ; Intervention ; Measurement Techniques ; Online Surveys ; Principals ; School Buildings ; School Districts ; Screening Tests ; Special Education ; Students with Disabilities</subject><ispartof>Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2022-10, Vol.24 (4), p.266-277</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,79113</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1350214$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Briesch, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dineen, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoach, D. Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, Aberdine</creatorcontrib><title>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</title><title>Journal of positive behavior interventions</title><description>Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Administrator Evaluation</subject><subject>Administrator Role</subject><subject>Assistant Principals</subject><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Data Use</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Emotional Problems</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>School Buildings</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Students with Disabilities</subject><issn>1098-3007</issn><issn>1538-4772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAdhwaupu9l_ybGt1SoFxeo5bDeTdkuSrbup4Lc3MaIH8fQG3u_NMA-hc0pGlCp1TUmaMEJUTCkhjDFxgAZUsCTiSsWH7dz6UQcco5MQtoQQKSUdoHJpNs6VeLK3ZW7rNR7nla1taLxunMfPsHO-CdgVeGk8QN0hT16bxhoIeGy8C53oHCprrvAENvrdOq_LK6zrHM9Bl80G37hK2zqcoqNClwHOvnWIXm9nL9N5tHi8u5-OF5FhjDeRTAiVuUphxUHRVKeSJQzyQhNhQILgq6L9TMiCSSaU0MAEpybmXBQJZ0qwIbrs9-68e9tDaLKt2_u6PZnFioqYSCFlS9Ge-nrCQ5HtvK20_8goybpSsz-ltpmLPgPemh9-9kCZIDHlrT_q_aDX8Hv1_4Wf2RN-8A</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Briesch, Amy M.</creator><creator>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</creator><creator>Dineen, Jennifer N.</creator><creator>McCoach, D. Betsy</creator><creator>Donaldson, Aberdine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</title><author>Briesch, Amy M. ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Dineen, Jennifer N. ; McCoach, D. Betsy ; Donaldson, Aberdine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Administrator Evaluation</topic><topic>Administrator Role</topic><topic>Assistant Principals</topic><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Data Use</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Emotional Problems</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>School Buildings</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Students with Disabilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briesch, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dineen, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoach, D. Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, Aberdine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briesch, Amy M.</au><au>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</au><au>Dineen, Jennifer N.</au><au>McCoach, D. Betsy</au><au>Donaldson, Aberdine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1350214</ericid><atitle>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>266-277</pages><issn>1098-3007</issn><eissn>1538-4772</eissn><abstract>Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10983007211003335</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3007
ispartof Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2022-10, Vol.24 (4), p.266-277
issn 1098-3007
1538-4772
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2715206566
source ERIC; Sage Journals Online
subjects Academic Achievement
Administrator Evaluation
Administrator Role
Assistant Principals
At Risk Students
Best Practices
Data Use
Disability Identification
Educational Practices
Elementary Secondary Education
Emotional Problems
Health
Incidence
Interpersonal Competence
Intervention
Measurement Techniques
Online Surveys
Principals
School Buildings
School Districts
Screening Tests
Special Education
Students with Disabilities
title School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A34%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=School%20Building%20Administrator%20Reports%20of%20Screening%20Practices%20Across%20Academic,%20Behavioral,%20and%20Health%20Domains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20positive%20behavior%20interventions&rft.au=Briesch,%20Amy%20M.&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=266-277&rft.issn=1098-3007&rft.eissn=1538-4772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10983007211003335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715206566%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715206566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1350214&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10983007211003335&rfr_iscdi=true