Loading…
School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains
Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique s...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of positive behavior interventions 2022-10, Vol.24 (4), p.266-277 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753 |
container_end_page | 277 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 266 |
container_title | Journal of positive behavior interventions |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Briesch, Amy M. Chafouleas, Sandra M. Dineen, Jennifer N. McCoach, D. Betsy Donaldson, Aberdine |
description | Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/10983007211003335 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2715206566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1350214</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_10983007211003335</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2715206566</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAdhwaupu9l_ybGt1SoFxeo5bDeTdkuSrbup4Lc3MaIH8fQG3u_NMA-hc0pGlCp1TUmaMEJUTCkhjDFxgAZUsCTiSsWH7dz6UQcco5MQtoQQKSUdoHJpNs6VeLK3ZW7rNR7nla1taLxunMfPsHO-CdgVeGk8QN0hT16bxhoIeGy8C53oHCprrvAENvrdOq_LK6zrHM9Bl80G37hK2zqcoqNClwHOvnWIXm9nL9N5tHi8u5-OF5FhjDeRTAiVuUphxUHRVKeSJQzyQhNhQILgq6L9TMiCSSaU0MAEpybmXBQJZ0qwIbrs9-68e9tDaLKt2_u6PZnFioqYSCFlS9Ge-nrCQ5HtvK20_8goybpSsz-ltpmLPgPemh9-9kCZIDHlrT_q_aDX8Hv1_4Wf2RN-8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2715206566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Briesch, Amy M. ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Dineen, Jennifer N. ; McCoach, D. Betsy ; Donaldson, Aberdine</creator><creatorcontrib>Briesch, Amy M. ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Dineen, Jennifer N. ; McCoach, D. Betsy ; Donaldson, Aberdine</creatorcontrib><description>Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10983007211003335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Administrator Evaluation ; Administrator Role ; Assistant Principals ; At Risk Students ; Best Practices ; Data Use ; Disability Identification ; Educational Practices ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Emotional Problems ; Health ; Incidence ; Interpersonal Competence ; Intervention ; Measurement Techniques ; Online Surveys ; Principals ; School Buildings ; School Districts ; Screening Tests ; Special Education ; Students with Disabilities</subject><ispartof>Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2022-10, Vol.24 (4), p.266-277</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,79113</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1350214$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Briesch, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dineen, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoach, D. Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, Aberdine</creatorcontrib><title>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</title><title>Journal of positive behavior interventions</title><description>Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Administrator Evaluation</subject><subject>Administrator Role</subject><subject>Assistant Principals</subject><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Data Use</subject><subject>Disability Identification</subject><subject>Educational Practices</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Emotional Problems</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Interpersonal Competence</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measurement Techniques</subject><subject>Online Surveys</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>School Buildings</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>Screening Tests</subject><subject>Special Education</subject><subject>Students with Disabilities</subject><issn>1098-3007</issn><issn>1538-4772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRsFY_gAdhwaupu9l_ybGt1SoFxeo5bDeTdkuSrbup4Lc3MaIH8fQG3u_NMA-hc0pGlCp1TUmaMEJUTCkhjDFxgAZUsCTiSsWH7dz6UQcco5MQtoQQKSUdoHJpNs6VeLK3ZW7rNR7nla1taLxunMfPsHO-CdgVeGk8QN0hT16bxhoIeGy8C53oHCprrvAENvrdOq_LK6zrHM9Bl80G37hK2zqcoqNClwHOvnWIXm9nL9N5tHi8u5-OF5FhjDeRTAiVuUphxUHRVKeSJQzyQhNhQILgq6L9TMiCSSaU0MAEpybmXBQJZ0qwIbrs9-68e9tDaLKt2_u6PZnFioqYSCFlS9Ge-nrCQ5HtvK20_8goybpSsz-ltpmLPgPemh9-9kCZIDHlrT_q_aDX8Hv1_4Wf2RN-8A</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Briesch, Amy M.</creator><creator>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</creator><creator>Dineen, Jennifer N.</creator><creator>McCoach, D. Betsy</creator><creator>Donaldson, Aberdine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</title><author>Briesch, Amy M. ; Chafouleas, Sandra M. ; Dineen, Jennifer N. ; McCoach, D. Betsy ; Donaldson, Aberdine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Administrator Evaluation</topic><topic>Administrator Role</topic><topic>Assistant Principals</topic><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Data Use</topic><topic>Disability Identification</topic><topic>Educational Practices</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Emotional Problems</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Interpersonal Competence</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measurement Techniques</topic><topic>Online Surveys</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>School Buildings</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>Screening Tests</topic><topic>Special Education</topic><topic>Students with Disabilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Briesch, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dineen, Jennifer N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCoach, D. Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donaldson, Aberdine</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Briesch, Amy M.</au><au>Chafouleas, Sandra M.</au><au>Dineen, Jennifer N.</au><au>McCoach, D. Betsy</au><au>Donaldson, Aberdine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1350214</ericid><atitle>School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains</atitle><jtitle>Journal of positive behavior interventions</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>266</spage><epage>277</epage><pages>266-277</pages><issn>1098-3007</issn><eissn>1538-4772</eissn><abstract>Research conducted to date provides a limited understanding of the landscape of school-based screening practices across academic, behavioral, and health domains, thus providing an impetus for the current survey study. A total of 475 K–Grade 12 school building administrators representing 409 unique school districts across the United States completed an online survey, which assessed current school-based screening practices across domains from the point of data collection to intervention selection. Whereas 70% to 81% of the respondents reported the use of universal screening across health and academic domains, respectively, only 9% of the respondents endorsed the use of universal social, emotional, and behavioral screening. In addition, discrepancies were identified across domains with regard to such factors as (a) who reviews screening data, (b) how screening data are used to determine student risk, and (c) how interventions are designed for those students demonstrating risk. The lack of consensus in practice calls for dissemination concerning best practices in the implementation of social, emotional, and behavioral screening; risk identification; and Tier 1 intervention.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10983007211003335</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-3007 |
ispartof | Journal of positive behavior interventions, 2022-10, Vol.24 (4), p.266-277 |
issn | 1098-3007 1538-4772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2715206566 |
source | ERIC; Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Academic Achievement Administrator Evaluation Administrator Role Assistant Principals At Risk Students Best Practices Data Use Disability Identification Educational Practices Elementary Secondary Education Emotional Problems Health Incidence Interpersonal Competence Intervention Measurement Techniques Online Surveys Principals School Buildings School Districts Screening Tests Special Education Students with Disabilities |
title | School Building Administrator Reports of Screening Practices Across Academic, Behavioral, and Health Domains |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A34%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=School%20Building%20Administrator%20Reports%20of%20Screening%20Practices%20Across%20Academic,%20Behavioral,%20and%20Health%20Domains&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20positive%20behavior%20interventions&rft.au=Briesch,%20Amy%20M.&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=266&rft.epage=277&rft.pages=266-277&rft.issn=1098-3007&rft.eissn=1538-4772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10983007211003335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2715206566%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-68016d79eb4e719a96383edfa05ce6e54bf53856f363575ae3541c2445f843753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2715206566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1350214&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10983007211003335&rfr_iscdi=true |