The Unintended Beneficiaries of Farm Subsidies

From 2011 to 2017, the U.S. government paid farmers $6 billion annually in decoupled subsidies. Around 60% of cropland is rented, so if landlords raise rents in response to subsidy payments, the subsidies may not benefit the farmers as much as intended by policy. The Agricultural Act of 2014 linked...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Land economics 2022-11, Vol.98 (4), p.658-673
Main Authors: Boussios, David, Castillo, Marcelo, Brewer, Brady
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural land
Agricultural production
Agricultural subsidies
Beneficiaries
Farmers
Farms
Landlords
Payments
Productivity
Rents
Subsidies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:From 2011 to 2017, the U.S. government paid farmers $6 billion annually in decoupled subsidies. Around 60% of cropland is rented, so if landlords raise rents in response to subsidy payments, the subsidies may not benefit the farmers as much as intended by policy. The Agricultural Act of 2014 linked subsidy payments to county characteristics and idiosyncratic yields. Instead of payments tied to farm-level productivity, which challenged identification under earlier programs, the programs offer a new path for identifying subsidy incidences. We find rents increase by approximately $0.45–$0.65 for every dollar received, roughly double what prior research found.
ISSN:0023-7639
1543-8325
DOI:10.3368/le.98.4.062620-0093R1