Not Ready for Prime Time: Financial Reporting Quality After SPAC Mergers

We examine the financial reporting quality of special purpose acquisition corporations (SPACs) following a successful merger. We compare a sample of SPACs with completed mergers from 2006 to 2020 to initial public offering (IPO) firms in the same industry covering the same period. Compared with simi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Management science 2022-09, Vol.68 (9), p.7054-7064
Main Authors: Kim, Jaewoo, Park, Seyoung, Peterson, Kyle, Wilson, Ryan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acquisitions & mergers
Companies
Earnings
Financial reporting
financial reporting quality
Financial statements
Initial public offerings
Investors
IPO
Mergers
SPAC
Special purpose acquisition companies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We examine the financial reporting quality of special purpose acquisition corporations (SPACs) following a successful merger. We compare a sample of SPACs with completed mergers from 2006 to 2020 to initial public offering (IPO) firms in the same industry covering the same period. Compared with similar IPO firms, SPACs are more likely to restate their financial statements and have internal control weaknesses. We also find that SPACs are more likely to file untimely financial statements, amend previously issued filings, and have comment letters that go more rounds with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This lower reporting quality also results in less informative earnings to investors. Our evidence corroborates concerns from the media, accounting firms, and regulators that SPACs exhibit low financial reporting quality in comparison with IPOs. This paper was accepted by Suraj Srinivasan, accounting.
ISSN:0025-1909
1526-5501
DOI:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4478