Fifty Shades of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Conceptual Synthesis via a Decision Frame Lens

To address the question of why corporate executives adopt diverse corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies, this conceptual paper proposes a decision-frame model to explain how differences in executives’ information-processing templates can lead to different strategic choices concerning CSR....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sustainability 2022-09, Vol.14 (18), p.11505
Main Authors: Hu, Jinyu, Rong, Yu, McKee-Ryan, Frances M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bibliometrics
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive appraisal
Configurations
Corporate social responsibility
Decision making
Forecasts and trends
Information processing
Leadership
Management
Methods
Nooyi, Indra
Psychological aspects
Shades
Social responsibility
Stakeholders
Success
Values
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To address the question of why corporate executives adopt diverse corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategies, this conceptual paper proposes a decision-frame model to explain how differences in executives’ information-processing templates can lead to different strategic choices concerning CSR. Drawing on managerial cognition research and CSR literature, the CSR decision frame is conceptualized as a three-dimensional configuration. Each dimension depicts a continuum of responses to each of the three fundamental issues related to CSR (i.e., corporate’s objectives, corporate’s stakeholders, and leader’s responsibilities). The key premise is that the specific content and structure of a CSR decision-frame configuration define a leader’s unique stance on environmental and social issues, which, in turn, influence their sense-making process and shape CSR responses and strategies. This CSR decision-frame approach provides a process lens that highlights the cognitive mechanisms of how executives make critical CSR strategic decisions. Furthermore, this paper advances the understanding of the diversity in CSR strategy with a nuanced mental-configuration perspective: CSR means many different things to different leaders depending on the unique content and structure of his or her CSR decision frame; these varying subjective representations of CSR principles contribute to the diverse CSR responses across firms.
ISSN:2071-1050
2071-1050
DOI:10.3390/su141811505