Loading…
Theory of Practice and China Research: Legal and Social Science Studies
This article reviews the theory of practice that the author has employed for many years, including a discussion of my understanding of the ideas of its original founder Pierre Bourdieu, and my borrowing, expanding, and reinterpreting of his theory. I have long advocated the development of a new “soc...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Modern China 2022-11, Vol.48 (6), p.1115-1139 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-d9f227a81896a1a8524a1ae9d1c6e07b846e60634af11e76426f56eca85d4533 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-d9f227a81896a1a8524a1ae9d1c6e07b846e60634af11e76426f56eca85d4533 |
| container_end_page | 1139 |
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1115 |
| container_title | Modern China |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Huang, Philip C. C. |
| description | This article reviews the theory of practice that the author has employed for many years, including a discussion of my understanding of the ideas of its original founder Pierre Bourdieu, and my borrowing, expanding, and reinterpreting of his theory. I have long advocated the development of a new “social science of practice,” which is to say, to begin our research from the study of actual practice, on that basis re-examine and reformulate existing theories or generate new concepts, and then return once more to practice to test those. In hindsight, my own research into the biculturality of late-developing China from Western invasion and influence as well as from indigenous tradition, especially as manifested in its changing justice system, has been crucially important to my rethinking of the theory of practice. This article summarizes the key issues and major points involved. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/00977004221120181 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2718095506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_00977004221120181</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2718095506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-d9f227a81896a1a8524a1ae9d1c6e07b846e60634af11e76426f56eca85d4533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFY_gLeA59SZTfZPvEnQKhQU23tYN5MmpSZ1Nzn027s1ggfx9Abe772Bx9g1whxRqVuAXCmAjHNEDqjxhEUoBE-kTuUpi45-cgTO2YX3WwBQwHnEFuuGeneI-zp-dcYOraXYdFVcNG1n4jfyZJxt7uIlbczu21n1tg3nyrbUBXg1jFVL_pKd1Wbn6epHZ2z9-LAunpLly-K5uF8mlisxJFVec66MRp1Lg0YLngWhvEIrCdS7ziRJkGlmakRSMuOyFpJsIKtMpOmM3Uy1e9d_juSHctuPrgsfS65QQy5ESM8YTpR1vfeO6nLv2g_jDiVCeZyr_DNXyMynjDcb-m39P_AFsO5nRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2718095506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theory of Practice and China Research: Legal and Social Science Studies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Huang, Philip C. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><description>This article reviews the theory of practice that the author has employed for many years, including a discussion of my understanding of the ideas of its original founder Pierre Bourdieu, and my borrowing, expanding, and reinterpreting of his theory. I have long advocated the development of a new “social science of practice,” which is to say, to begin our research from the study of actual practice, on that basis re-examine and reformulate existing theories or generate new concepts, and then return once more to practice to test those. In hindsight, my own research into the biculturality of late-developing China from Western invasion and influence as well as from indigenous tradition, especially as manifested in its changing justice system, has been crucially important to my rethinking of the theory of practice. This article summarizes the key issues and major points involved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0097-7004</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6836</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/00977004221120181</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Academic disciplines ; Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002) ; Logic ; Rationality ; Social development ; Social research ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Modern China, 2022-11, Vol.48 (6), p.1115-1139</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-d9f227a81896a1a8524a1ae9d1c6e07b846e60634af11e76426f56eca85d4533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-d9f227a81896a1a8524a1ae9d1c6e07b846e60634af11e76426f56eca85d4533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33774,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Theory of Practice and China Research: Legal and Social Science Studies</title><title>Modern China</title><description>This article reviews the theory of practice that the author has employed for many years, including a discussion of my understanding of the ideas of its original founder Pierre Bourdieu, and my borrowing, expanding, and reinterpreting of his theory. I have long advocated the development of a new “social science of practice,” which is to say, to begin our research from the study of actual practice, on that basis re-examine and reformulate existing theories or generate new concepts, and then return once more to practice to test those. In hindsight, my own research into the biculturality of late-developing China from Western invasion and influence as well as from indigenous tradition, especially as manifested in its changing justice system, has been crucially important to my rethinking of the theory of practice. This article summarizes the key issues and major points involved.</description><subject>Academic disciplines</subject><subject>Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Social development</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0097-7004</issn><issn>1552-6836</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE9Lw0AQxRdRMFY_gLeA59SZTfZPvEnQKhQU23tYN5MmpSZ1Nzn027s1ggfx9Abe772Bx9g1whxRqVuAXCmAjHNEDqjxhEUoBE-kTuUpi45-cgTO2YX3WwBQwHnEFuuGeneI-zp-dcYOraXYdFVcNG1n4jfyZJxt7uIlbczu21n1tg3nyrbUBXg1jFVL_pKd1Wbn6epHZ2z9-LAunpLly-K5uF8mlisxJFVec66MRp1Lg0YLngWhvEIrCdS7ziRJkGlmakRSMuOyFpJsIKtMpOmM3Uy1e9d_juSHctuPrgsfS65QQy5ESM8YTpR1vfeO6nLv2g_jDiVCeZyr_DNXyMynjDcb-m39P_AFsO5nRw</recordid><startdate>202211</startdate><enddate>202211</enddate><creator>Huang, Philip C. C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202211</creationdate><title>Theory of Practice and China Research: Legal and Social Science Studies</title><author>Huang, Philip C. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-d9f227a81896a1a8524a1ae9d1c6e07b846e60634af11e76426f56eca85d4533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Academic disciplines</topic><topic>Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Social development</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Philip C. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Modern China</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Philip C. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theory of Practice and China Research: Legal and Social Science Studies</atitle><jtitle>Modern China</jtitle><date>2022-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1115</spage><epage>1139</epage><pages>1115-1139</pages><issn>0097-7004</issn><eissn>1552-6836</eissn><abstract>This article reviews the theory of practice that the author has employed for many years, including a discussion of my understanding of the ideas of its original founder Pierre Bourdieu, and my borrowing, expanding, and reinterpreting of his theory. I have long advocated the development of a new “social science of practice,” which is to say, to begin our research from the study of actual practice, on that basis re-examine and reformulate existing theories or generate new concepts, and then return once more to practice to test those. In hindsight, my own research into the biculturality of late-developing China from Western invasion and influence as well as from indigenous tradition, especially as manifested in its changing justice system, has been crucially important to my rethinking of the theory of practice. This article summarizes the key issues and major points involved.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/00977004221120181</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0097-7004 |
| ispartof | Modern China, 2022-11, Vol.48 (6), p.1115-1139 |
| issn | 0097-7004 1552-6836 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2718095506 |
| source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals Online; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Academic disciplines Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002) Logic Rationality Social development Social research Theory |
| title | Theory of Practice and China Research: Legal and Social Science Studies |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theory%20of%20Practice%20and%20China%20Research:%20Legal%20and%20Social%20Science%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Modern%20China&rft.au=Huang,%20Philip%20C.%20C.&rft.date=2022-11&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1115&rft.epage=1139&rft.pages=1115-1139&rft.issn=0097-7004&rft.eissn=1552-6836&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/00977004221120181&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2718095506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-d9f227a81896a1a8524a1ae9d1c6e07b846e60634af11e76426f56eca85d4533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2718095506&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_00977004221120181&rfr_iscdi=true |