A comparative study on finite element analysis of hot and cold rolled concrete filled steel tube composite columns

This study investigated the comparison of circular and rectangular concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns of hot rolled and cold rolled-light gauge columns using the Finite element analysis method. The ultimate load capacity, axial deformation, and stress-strain patterns were compared and discuss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arokiaprakash, A., Selvan, S. Senthil
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Axial loads
Axial stress
Cold
Cold rolling
Cold-rolled steel
Comparative studies
Composite columns
Deformation
Failure modes
Finite element analysis
Finite element method
Hot rolling
Hot-rolled steel
Material properties
Steel columns
Steel tubes
Thickness ratio
Ultimate loads
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2515
creator Arokiaprakash, A.
Selvan, S. Senthil
description This study investigated the comparison of circular and rectangular concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns of hot rolled and cold rolled-light gauge columns using the Finite element analysis method. The ultimate load capacity, axial deformation, and stress-strain patterns were compared and discussed for both types of columns. ABAQUS software is used to study the behavior of both types of composite columns by the Finite Element Method (FEM) under axial loading. The major variable considered for the experiment is the thickness of the steel. The thickness of hot rolled and cold rolled light gauge steel is 5.2 mm and 2 mm respectively. It is one circular column constructed with hot rolled steel and the other with cold rolled steel type infilled with M25 grade concrete, which is similar to the same construction for the rectangular type and both simulated in the ABAQUS. This study revealed that light-gauge steel composite columns showed greater yield strength in terms of load to thickness ratio compared to hot-rolled regular steel composite columns. The ultimate axial load with respect to the failure mode is compared to the varied geometric and material properties of the CFST column. The behavior of the column’s load-deformation is tabulated and depicted in the graphs.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0103108
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2719567338</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2719567338</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1688-140b9046c6ac218621bc10f042c82a0aab3fa6f6394197e468fea2713b4c06163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOAb0LnvU2apo9j-A8Gvij4VtIswY62qUkq7Nubbnu698DvHDiHkHuEFYJgT8UKEBiCvCALLArMSoHikiwAKp7lnH1fk5sQ9gB5VZZyQfyaatePyqvY_hka4rQ7UDdQ2w5tNNR0pjdDpGpQ3SG0gTpLf9ysd8nX7ah3XWfmf9DeJINtjzpEYzoap8Yc412Yw5Jh6odwS66s6oK5O98l-Xp5_ty8ZduP1_fNepuNKKTMkENTARdaKJ2jFDk2GsECz7XMFSjVMKuEFaziWJWGC2mNyktkDdeQSrMleTjljt79TibEeu8mn4qEOmFVIUrGZKIeT1TQbUwjuKEefdsrf6gR6nnTuqjPm7J_hnRpJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2719567338</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>A comparative study on finite element analysis of hot and cold rolled concrete filled steel tube composite columns</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Arokiaprakash, A. ; Selvan, S. Senthil</creator><contributor>Gunasekaran, K ; Krishnaraj, L ; Balasubramanian, M ; Satyanarayanan, KS</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arokiaprakash, A. ; Selvan, S. Senthil ; Gunasekaran, K ; Krishnaraj, L ; Balasubramanian, M ; Satyanarayanan, KS</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the comparison of circular and rectangular concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns of hot rolled and cold rolled-light gauge columns using the Finite element analysis method. The ultimate load capacity, axial deformation, and stress-strain patterns were compared and discussed for both types of columns. ABAQUS software is used to study the behavior of both types of composite columns by the Finite Element Method (FEM) under axial loading. The major variable considered for the experiment is the thickness of the steel. The thickness of hot rolled and cold rolled light gauge steel is 5.2 mm and 2 mm respectively. It is one circular column constructed with hot rolled steel and the other with cold rolled steel type infilled with M25 grade concrete, which is similar to the same construction for the rectangular type and both simulated in the ABAQUS. This study revealed that light-gauge steel composite columns showed greater yield strength in terms of load to thickness ratio compared to hot-rolled regular steel composite columns. The ultimate axial load with respect to the failure mode is compared to the varied geometric and material properties of the CFST column. The behavior of the column’s load-deformation is tabulated and depicted in the graphs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0103108</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Axial loads ; Axial stress ; Cold ; Cold rolling ; Cold-rolled steel ; Comparative studies ; Composite columns ; Deformation ; Failure modes ; Finite element analysis ; Finite element method ; Hot rolling ; Hot-rolled steel ; Material properties ; Steel columns ; Steel tubes ; Thickness ratio ; Ultimate loads</subject><ispartof>AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, Vol.2515 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2022 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Gunasekaran, K</contributor><contributor>Krishnaraj, L</contributor><contributor>Balasubramanian, M</contributor><contributor>Satyanarayanan, KS</contributor><creatorcontrib>Arokiaprakash, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvan, S. Senthil</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study on finite element analysis of hot and cold rolled concrete filled steel tube composite columns</title><title>AIP Conference Proceedings</title><description>This study investigated the comparison of circular and rectangular concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns of hot rolled and cold rolled-light gauge columns using the Finite element analysis method. The ultimate load capacity, axial deformation, and stress-strain patterns were compared and discussed for both types of columns. ABAQUS software is used to study the behavior of both types of composite columns by the Finite Element Method (FEM) under axial loading. The major variable considered for the experiment is the thickness of the steel. The thickness of hot rolled and cold rolled light gauge steel is 5.2 mm and 2 mm respectively. It is one circular column constructed with hot rolled steel and the other with cold rolled steel type infilled with M25 grade concrete, which is similar to the same construction for the rectangular type and both simulated in the ABAQUS. This study revealed that light-gauge steel composite columns showed greater yield strength in terms of load to thickness ratio compared to hot-rolled regular steel composite columns. The ultimate axial load with respect to the failure mode is compared to the varied geometric and material properties of the CFST column. The behavior of the column’s load-deformation is tabulated and depicted in the graphs.</description><subject>Axial loads</subject><subject>Axial stress</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>Cold rolling</subject><subject>Cold-rolled steel</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Composite columns</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Failure modes</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Hot rolling</subject><subject>Hot-rolled steel</subject><subject>Material properties</subject><subject>Steel columns</subject><subject>Steel tubes</subject><subject>Thickness ratio</subject><subject>Ultimate loads</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcPfoOAb0LnvU2apo9j-A8Gvij4VtIswY62qUkq7Nubbnu698DvHDiHkHuEFYJgT8UKEBiCvCALLArMSoHikiwAKp7lnH1fk5sQ9gB5VZZyQfyaatePyqvY_hka4rQ7UDdQ2w5tNNR0pjdDpGpQ3SG0gTpLf9ysd8nX7ah3XWfmf9DeJINtjzpEYzoap8Yc412Yw5Jh6odwS66s6oK5O98l-Xp5_ty8ZduP1_fNepuNKKTMkENTARdaKJ2jFDk2GsECz7XMFSjVMKuEFaziWJWGC2mNyktkDdeQSrMleTjljt79TibEeu8mn4qEOmFVIUrGZKIeT1TQbUwjuKEefdsrf6gR6nnTuqjPm7J_hnRpJg</recordid><startdate>20220930</startdate><enddate>20220930</enddate><creator>Arokiaprakash, A.</creator><creator>Selvan, S. Senthil</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220930</creationdate><title>A comparative study on finite element analysis of hot and cold rolled concrete filled steel tube composite columns</title><author>Arokiaprakash, A. ; Selvan, S. Senthil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1688-140b9046c6ac218621bc10f042c82a0aab3fa6f6394197e468fea2713b4c06163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Axial loads</topic><topic>Axial stress</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>Cold rolling</topic><topic>Cold-rolled steel</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Composite columns</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Failure modes</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Hot rolling</topic><topic>Hot-rolled steel</topic><topic>Material properties</topic><topic>Steel columns</topic><topic>Steel tubes</topic><topic>Thickness ratio</topic><topic>Ultimate loads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arokiaprakash, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Selvan, S. Senthil</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arokiaprakash, A.</au><au>Selvan, S. Senthil</au><au>Gunasekaran, K</au><au>Krishnaraj, L</au><au>Balasubramanian, M</au><au>Satyanarayanan, KS</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>A comparative study on finite element analysis of hot and cold rolled concrete filled steel tube composite columns</atitle><btitle>AIP Conference Proceedings</btitle><date>2022-09-30</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>2515</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>This study investigated the comparison of circular and rectangular concrete filled steel tube (CFST) columns of hot rolled and cold rolled-light gauge columns using the Finite element analysis method. The ultimate load capacity, axial deformation, and stress-strain patterns were compared and discussed for both types of columns. ABAQUS software is used to study the behavior of both types of composite columns by the Finite Element Method (FEM) under axial loading. The major variable considered for the experiment is the thickness of the steel. The thickness of hot rolled and cold rolled light gauge steel is 5.2 mm and 2 mm respectively. It is one circular column constructed with hot rolled steel and the other with cold rolled steel type infilled with M25 grade concrete, which is similar to the same construction for the rectangular type and both simulated in the ABAQUS. This study revealed that light-gauge steel composite columns showed greater yield strength in terms of load to thickness ratio compared to hot-rolled regular steel composite columns. The ultimate axial load with respect to the failure mode is compared to the varied geometric and material properties of the CFST column. The behavior of the column’s load-deformation is tabulated and depicted in the graphs.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0103108</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP Conference Proceedings, 2022, Vol.2515 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2719567338
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Axial loads
Axial stress
Cold
Cold rolling
Cold-rolled steel
Comparative studies
Composite columns
Deformation
Failure modes
Finite element analysis
Finite element method
Hot rolling
Hot-rolled steel
Material properties
Steel columns
Steel tubes
Thickness ratio
Ultimate loads
title A comparative study on finite element analysis of hot and cold rolled concrete filled steel tube composite columns
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20on%20finite%20element%20analysis%20of%20hot%20and%20cold%20rolled%20concrete%20filled%20steel%20tube%20composite%20columns&rft.btitle=AIP%20Conference%20Proceedings&rft.au=Arokiaprakash,%20A.&rft.date=2022-09-30&rft.volume=2515&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0103108&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2719567338%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1688-140b9046c6ac218621bc10f042c82a0aab3fa6f6394197e468fea2713b4c06163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2719567338&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true