Loading…

The effects of a decade of agri‐environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies

Declines in farmland biodiversity remain evident despite over three decades of research and implementation of agri‐environment schemes (AES). Although positive effects of AES are often demonstrated locally or in the short term, studies exploring longer term trends in biodiversity often show contradi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of applied ecology 2022-10, Vol.59 (10), p.2486-2496
Main Authors: Redhead, John W., Hinsley, Shelley A., Botham, Marc S., Broughton, Richard K., Freeman, Stephen N., Bellamy, Paul E., Siriwardena, Gavin, Randle, Zoë, Nowakowski, Marek, Heard, Matthew S., Pywell, Richard F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-8919b72c7d61830b32a463d2048d55768a944560685666e9f12905793a06040d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-8919b72c7d61830b32a463d2048d55768a944560685666e9f12905793a06040d3
container_end_page 2496
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2486
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 59
creator Redhead, John W.
Hinsley, Shelley A.
Botham, Marc S.
Broughton, Richard K.
Freeman, Stephen N.
Bellamy, Paul E.
Siriwardena, Gavin
Randle, Zoë
Nowakowski, Marek
Heard, Matthew S.
Pywell, Richard F.
description Declines in farmland biodiversity remain evident despite over three decades of research and implementation of agri‐environment schemes (AES). Although positive effects of AES are often demonstrated locally or in the short term, studies exploring longer term trends in biodiversity often show contradictory results. Evidence for the potential of AES to drive beneficial changes in populations remains sparse, especially for mobile taxa such as birds and butterflies. We analysed the abundance of 12 widespread bird and 9 butterfly species from a 10‐year study of AES intervention in a farmland landscape in southern England. We compared estimates of annual population growth rates from our study landscape with rates derived from large‐scale national monitoring schemes in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES. Species trends in our study landscape were frequently stable or increasing, in contrast to concurrent declining trends in equivalent landscapes without AES. These differences were significant for total abundance of granivorous species and for chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus and great tit Parus major individually. For butterflies, differences in trends were significantly more positive for gatekeeper Pyronia tithonus and green‐veined white Pieris napi, while small white P. rapae showed a trend that was significantly more negative in our study landscape. Synthesis and applications. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that these trends can show significant differences from those in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES interventions. Our results suggest that previously observed inconsistencies in AES benefits may in part reflect a lack of long‐term studies with accurate data on AES uptake and quality (i.e. successful implementation and management). Our results, thus, affirm the importance of delivering and monitoring high‐quality AES options if the design and implementation of the next generation of AES is to achieve significant benefits for biodiversity. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that th
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.14246
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2719984902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2719984902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-8919b72c7d61830b32a463d2048d55768a944560685666e9f12905793a06040d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLtOwzAYhS0EEqUws0ZiDvUtTjyiqtxUCYYyW05ig6vUDnbSqhsDD8Az8iQ4DWLFi89vf-fYOgBcIniN4pohwrIUM0avEcWUHYHJ38kxmECIUVpwiE7BWQhrCCHPCJmAz9WbSpTWqupC4nQik1pVslYH_erN98eXslvjnd0o2yXGdspvozLOxiHijds10taJln6TDCpUso12m7Su7Rt5IDuv4sWQWRofxWAo-y5m6caocA5OtGyCuvjdp-DldrGa36fLp7uH-c0yrQjiLH4f8TLHVV4zVBBYEiwpIzWGtKizLGeF5JRmDLIiY4wprhHmMMs5kZBBCmsyBVdjbuvde69CJ9au9zY-KXCOOC8ohzhSs5GqvAvBKy1abzbS7wWCYqhaDMWKoVhxqDo6stGxM43a_4eLx-fF6PsB6LmAow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2719984902</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of a decade of agri‐environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Redhead, John W. ; Hinsley, Shelley A. ; Botham, Marc S. ; Broughton, Richard K. ; Freeman, Stephen N. ; Bellamy, Paul E. ; Siriwardena, Gavin ; Randle, Zoë ; Nowakowski, Marek ; Heard, Matthew S. ; Pywell, Richard F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Redhead, John W. ; Hinsley, Shelley A. ; Botham, Marc S. ; Broughton, Richard K. ; Freeman, Stephen N. ; Bellamy, Paul E. ; Siriwardena, Gavin ; Randle, Zoë ; Nowakowski, Marek ; Heard, Matthew S. ; Pywell, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><description>Declines in farmland biodiversity remain evident despite over three decades of research and implementation of agri‐environment schemes (AES). Although positive effects of AES are often demonstrated locally or in the short term, studies exploring longer term trends in biodiversity often show contradictory results. Evidence for the potential of AES to drive beneficial changes in populations remains sparse, especially for mobile taxa such as birds and butterflies. We analysed the abundance of 12 widespread bird and 9 butterfly species from a 10‐year study of AES intervention in a farmland landscape in southern England. We compared estimates of annual population growth rates from our study landscape with rates derived from large‐scale national monitoring schemes in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES. Species trends in our study landscape were frequently stable or increasing, in contrast to concurrent declining trends in equivalent landscapes without AES. These differences were significant for total abundance of granivorous species and for chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus and great tit Parus major individually. For butterflies, differences in trends were significantly more positive for gatekeeper Pyronia tithonus and green‐veined white Pieris napi, while small white P. rapae showed a trend that was significantly more negative in our study landscape. Synthesis and applications. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that these trends can show significant differences from those in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES interventions. Our results suggest that previously observed inconsistencies in AES benefits may in part reflect a lack of long‐term studies with accurate data on AES uptake and quality (i.e. successful implementation and management). Our results, thus, affirm the importance of delivering and monitoring high‐quality AES options if the design and implementation of the next generation of AES is to achieve significant benefits for biodiversity. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that these trends can show significant differences from those in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES interventions. Our results suggest that previously observed inconsistencies in AES benefits may in part reflect a lack of long‐term studies with accurate data on AES uptake and quality (i.e. successful implementation and management). Our results, thus, affirm the importance of delivering and monitoring high‐quality AES options if the design and implementation of the next generation of AES is to achieve significant benefits for biodiversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14246</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>abundance ; AES ; Agricultural land ; agriculture ; arable ; Biodiversity ; Birds ; Butterflies &amp; moths ; Commercial farms ; Equivalence ; farmland ; Growth rate ; landscape ; Monitoring ; Population growth ; Species ; Trends</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2022-10, Vol.59 (10), p.2486-2496</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-8919b72c7d61830b32a463d2048d55768a944560685666e9f12905793a06040d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-8919b72c7d61830b32a463d2048d55768a944560685666e9f12905793a06040d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2233-3848</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redhead, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinsley, Shelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botham, Marc S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broughton, Richard K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siriwardena, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randle, Zoë</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowakowski, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pywell, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of a decade of agri‐environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>Declines in farmland biodiversity remain evident despite over three decades of research and implementation of agri‐environment schemes (AES). Although positive effects of AES are often demonstrated locally or in the short term, studies exploring longer term trends in biodiversity often show contradictory results. Evidence for the potential of AES to drive beneficial changes in populations remains sparse, especially for mobile taxa such as birds and butterflies. We analysed the abundance of 12 widespread bird and 9 butterfly species from a 10‐year study of AES intervention in a farmland landscape in southern England. We compared estimates of annual population growth rates from our study landscape with rates derived from large‐scale national monitoring schemes in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES. Species trends in our study landscape were frequently stable or increasing, in contrast to concurrent declining trends in equivalent landscapes without AES. These differences were significant for total abundance of granivorous species and for chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus and great tit Parus major individually. For butterflies, differences in trends were significantly more positive for gatekeeper Pyronia tithonus and green‐veined white Pieris napi, while small white P. rapae showed a trend that was significantly more negative in our study landscape. Synthesis and applications. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that these trends can show significant differences from those in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES interventions. Our results suggest that previously observed inconsistencies in AES benefits may in part reflect a lack of long‐term studies with accurate data on AES uptake and quality (i.e. successful implementation and management). Our results, thus, affirm the importance of delivering and monitoring high‐quality AES options if the design and implementation of the next generation of AES is to achieve significant benefits for biodiversity. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that these trends can show significant differences from those in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES interventions. Our results suggest that previously observed inconsistencies in AES benefits may in part reflect a lack of long‐term studies with accurate data on AES uptake and quality (i.e. successful implementation and management). Our results, thus, affirm the importance of delivering and monitoring high‐quality AES options if the design and implementation of the next generation of AES is to achieve significant benefits for biodiversity.</description><subject>abundance</subject><subject>AES</subject><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>arable</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Butterflies &amp; moths</subject><subject>Commercial farms</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>farmland</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLtOwzAYhS0EEqUws0ZiDvUtTjyiqtxUCYYyW05ig6vUDnbSqhsDD8Az8iQ4DWLFi89vf-fYOgBcIniN4pohwrIUM0avEcWUHYHJ38kxmECIUVpwiE7BWQhrCCHPCJmAz9WbSpTWqupC4nQik1pVslYH_erN98eXslvjnd0o2yXGdspvozLOxiHijds10taJln6TDCpUso12m7Su7Rt5IDuv4sWQWRofxWAo-y5m6caocA5OtGyCuvjdp-DldrGa36fLp7uH-c0yrQjiLH4f8TLHVV4zVBBYEiwpIzWGtKizLGeF5JRmDLIiY4wprhHmMMs5kZBBCmsyBVdjbuvde69CJ9au9zY-KXCOOC8ohzhSs5GqvAvBKy1abzbS7wWCYqhaDMWKoVhxqDo6stGxM43a_4eLx-fF6PsB6LmAow</recordid><startdate>202210</startdate><enddate>202210</enddate><creator>Redhead, John W.</creator><creator>Hinsley, Shelley A.</creator><creator>Botham, Marc S.</creator><creator>Broughton, Richard K.</creator><creator>Freeman, Stephen N.</creator><creator>Bellamy, Paul E.</creator><creator>Siriwardena, Gavin</creator><creator>Randle, Zoë</creator><creator>Nowakowski, Marek</creator><creator>Heard, Matthew S.</creator><creator>Pywell, Richard F.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-3848</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202210</creationdate><title>The effects of a decade of agri‐environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies</title><author>Redhead, John W. ; Hinsley, Shelley A. ; Botham, Marc S. ; Broughton, Richard K. ; Freeman, Stephen N. ; Bellamy, Paul E. ; Siriwardena, Gavin ; Randle, Zoë ; Nowakowski, Marek ; Heard, Matthew S. ; Pywell, Richard F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-8919b72c7d61830b32a463d2048d55768a944560685666e9f12905793a06040d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>abundance</topic><topic>AES</topic><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>arable</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Butterflies &amp; moths</topic><topic>Commercial farms</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>farmland</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redhead, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinsley, Shelley A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Botham, Marc S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broughton, Richard K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellamy, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siriwardena, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randle, Zoë</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nowakowski, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heard, Matthew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pywell, Richard F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redhead, John W.</au><au>Hinsley, Shelley A.</au><au>Botham, Marc S.</au><au>Broughton, Richard K.</au><au>Freeman, Stephen N.</au><au>Bellamy, Paul E.</au><au>Siriwardena, Gavin</au><au>Randle, Zoë</au><au>Nowakowski, Marek</au><au>Heard, Matthew S.</au><au>Pywell, Richard F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of a decade of agri‐environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2022-10</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2486</spage><epage>2496</epage><pages>2486-2496</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><abstract>Declines in farmland biodiversity remain evident despite over three decades of research and implementation of agri‐environment schemes (AES). Although positive effects of AES are often demonstrated locally or in the short term, studies exploring longer term trends in biodiversity often show contradictory results. Evidence for the potential of AES to drive beneficial changes in populations remains sparse, especially for mobile taxa such as birds and butterflies. We analysed the abundance of 12 widespread bird and 9 butterfly species from a 10‐year study of AES intervention in a farmland landscape in southern England. We compared estimates of annual population growth rates from our study landscape with rates derived from large‐scale national monitoring schemes in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES. Species trends in our study landscape were frequently stable or increasing, in contrast to concurrent declining trends in equivalent landscapes without AES. These differences were significant for total abundance of granivorous species and for chaffinch Fringilla coelebs, blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus and great tit Parus major individually. For butterflies, differences in trends were significantly more positive for gatekeeper Pyronia tithonus and green‐veined white Pieris napi, while small white P. rapae showed a trend that was significantly more negative in our study landscape. Synthesis and applications. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that these trends can show significant differences from those in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES interventions. Our results suggest that previously observed inconsistencies in AES benefits may in part reflect a lack of long‐term studies with accurate data on AES uptake and quality (i.e. successful implementation and management). Our results, thus, affirm the importance of delivering and monitoring high‐quality AES options if the design and implementation of the next generation of AES is to achieve significant benefits for biodiversity. Our results demonstrate that, for some bird and butterfly species, the higher abundances associated with areas of AES uptake within a typical commercial farmland landscape can co‐occur with positive or stable population trends over long time scales and that these trends can show significant differences from those in equivalent landscapes without substantial AES interventions. Our results suggest that previously observed inconsistencies in AES benefits may in part reflect a lack of long‐term studies with accurate data on AES uptake and quality (i.e. successful implementation and management). Our results, thus, affirm the importance of delivering and monitoring high‐quality AES options if the design and implementation of the next generation of AES is to achieve significant benefits for biodiversity.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.14246</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-3848</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2022-10, Vol.59 (10), p.2486-2496
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2719984902
source Wiley
subjects abundance
AES
Agricultural land
agriculture
arable
Biodiversity
Birds
Butterflies & moths
Commercial farms
Equivalence
farmland
Growth rate
landscape
Monitoring
Population growth
Species
Trends
title The effects of a decade of agri‐environment intervention in a lowland farm landscape on population trends of birds and butterflies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A21%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20a%20decade%20of%20agri%E2%80%90environment%20intervention%20in%20a%20lowland%20farm%20landscape%20on%20population%20trends%20of%20birds%20and%20butterflies&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Redhead,%20John%20W.&rft.date=2022-10&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2486&rft.epage=2496&rft.pages=2486-2496&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.14246&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2719984902%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3196-8919b72c7d61830b32a463d2048d55768a944560685666e9f12905793a06040d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2719984902&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true