Loading…

Ionospheric response of St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm over Indian low latitude regions

The current work shows the ionospheric response to an intense geomagnetic storm known as St. Patrick’s Day storm which occurred from 17-22 March 2015 using the ionospheric vertical total electron content data over the low latitude Indian stations. We have tried to study how it has influenced the ver...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Astrophysics and space science 2022-10, Vol.367 (10), Article 103
Main Authors: Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar, Patel, Kalpana, Kumar, Sanjay, Singh, Abhay Kumar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1ce9fbf208023b07b43276a31ccda04fb8fbfe5891a22dc400e71fea76e00fc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1ce9fbf208023b07b43276a31ccda04fb8fbfe5891a22dc400e71fea76e00fc3
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page
container_title Astrophysics and space science
container_volume 367
creator Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar
Patel, Kalpana
Kumar, Sanjay
Singh, Abhay Kumar
description The current work shows the ionospheric response to an intense geomagnetic storm known as St. Patrick’s Day storm which occurred from 17-22 March 2015 using the ionospheric vertical total electron content data over the low latitude Indian stations. We have tried to study how it has influenced the vertical total electron content at four different low latitude stations: Varanasi (Geographic latitude 25°, 19’ N, longitude 82°, 59’ E), Lucknow (Geographic latitude 26°, 50’ N, longitude 80°, 55’ E), Bangalore (Geographic latitude 12°, 58’ N, longitude 77°, 35’ E), and Hyderabad (Geographic latitude 17°, 23’ N, longitude 78°, 27’ E). Various solar and geomagnetic parameters related to the geomagnetic storm have been analyzed to examine the consequences of geomagnetic storms on vertical total electron content. The analysis has been done on account of a comparison of mean total electron content estimated for geomagnetic quiet days and those during the period of the geomagnetic storm 17-21 March 2015. Analysis of vertical total electron content data during the storm period found a negative storm effect on 18 March during daytime at equatorial ionization anomaly station (Varanasi & Lucknow) and Positive storm effect at equatorial station (Hyderabad and Bangalore) which is in agreement with the results of Fagundes et al. ( 2015 ) reported in Brazil region. A strong positive storm effect in the daytime is noticed at EIA stations during 20-21 March which is higher at Lucknow (∼63 TECU) than that at Varanasi (∼37 TECU) whereas equatorial stations Bangalore and Hyderabad were found unaffected. The same results have also been reflected from total electron content data of single PRN 17. These positive and negative ionospheric storm effects observed during the geomagnetic storm have been explained using disturb dynamo electric field, prompt penetration electric field and neutral wind effects. The St. Patrick’s Day storm resulted in a minimum Disturbance Storm Time Index of −234 nT, Auroral Electrojet enhancement of up to 1000 nT, and a maximum enhancement of 33 percent of vertical total electron content (VTEC) values at Bangalore, an equatorial region, in comparison to average quiet days’ VTEC. This is known as the positive storm effect. The cohabitation of the prompt penetration electric field and the long-lasting disturbance dynamo electric field has caused the VTEC to respond favorably throughout the region and disturb dynamo electric field.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10509-022-04137-3
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2721075219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2721075219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1ce9fbf208023b07b43276a31ccda04fb8fbfe5891a22dc400e71fea76e00fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4CrgOvUmmZk0S6l_hYKCCl0ZMpnMOLWd1CRVuvM1fD2fxOgI7lxdcnO-c-FD6JjCiAKI00AhB0mAMQIZ5YLwHTSguWBEZsV8Fw0AICNFBvN9dBDCIj1lIcUAPU5d58L6yfrWYG_D2nXBYlfjuzjCtzqm9fPn-0fA53qLG-tWuulsTGyIzq-we7UeT7uq1R1euje81LGNm8omVdMm1SHaq_Uy2KPfOUQPlxf3k2syu7maTs5mxHAqI6mosbIuawZjYLwEUWaciUJzakylIavLcfq1-VhSzVhlMgAraG21KCxAbfgQnfTetXcvGxuiWriN79JJxQSjIHJGZaJYTxnvQvC2VmvfrrTfKgrqu0fV96hSj-qnR8VTiPehkOCusf5P_U_qC4bsd_8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2721075219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ionospheric response of St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm over Indian low latitude regions</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar ; Patel, Kalpana ; Kumar, Sanjay ; Singh, Abhay Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar ; Patel, Kalpana ; Kumar, Sanjay ; Singh, Abhay Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>The current work shows the ionospheric response to an intense geomagnetic storm known as St. Patrick’s Day storm which occurred from 17-22 March 2015 using the ionospheric vertical total electron content data over the low latitude Indian stations. We have tried to study how it has influenced the vertical total electron content at four different low latitude stations: Varanasi (Geographic latitude 25°, 19’ N, longitude 82°, 59’ E), Lucknow (Geographic latitude 26°, 50’ N, longitude 80°, 55’ E), Bangalore (Geographic latitude 12°, 58’ N, longitude 77°, 35’ E), and Hyderabad (Geographic latitude 17°, 23’ N, longitude 78°, 27’ E). Various solar and geomagnetic parameters related to the geomagnetic storm have been analyzed to examine the consequences of geomagnetic storms on vertical total electron content. The analysis has been done on account of a comparison of mean total electron content estimated for geomagnetic quiet days and those during the period of the geomagnetic storm 17-21 March 2015. Analysis of vertical total electron content data during the storm period found a negative storm effect on 18 March during daytime at equatorial ionization anomaly station (Varanasi &amp; Lucknow) and Positive storm effect at equatorial station (Hyderabad and Bangalore) which is in agreement with the results of Fagundes et al. ( 2015 ) reported in Brazil region. A strong positive storm effect in the daytime is noticed at EIA stations during 20-21 March which is higher at Lucknow (∼63 TECU) than that at Varanasi (∼37 TECU) whereas equatorial stations Bangalore and Hyderabad were found unaffected. The same results have also been reflected from total electron content data of single PRN 17. These positive and negative ionospheric storm effects observed during the geomagnetic storm have been explained using disturb dynamo electric field, prompt penetration electric field and neutral wind effects. The St. Patrick’s Day storm resulted in a minimum Disturbance Storm Time Index of −234 nT, Auroral Electrojet enhancement of up to 1000 nT, and a maximum enhancement of 33 percent of vertical total electron content (VTEC) values at Bangalore, an equatorial region, in comparison to average quiet days’ VTEC. This is known as the positive storm effect. The cohabitation of the prompt penetration electric field and the long-lasting disturbance dynamo electric field has caused the VTEC to respond favorably throughout the region and disturb dynamo electric field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-640X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-946X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10509-022-04137-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Astrobiology ; Astronomy ; Astrophysics ; Astrophysics and Astroparticles ; Auroral electrojet ; Auroral electrojets ; Cohabitation ; Cosmology ; Daytime ; Electric fields ; Electrojets ; Equatorial ionization anomaly ; Equatorial regions ; Geomagnetic storm effects ; Geomagnetic storms ; Geomagnetism ; Ionization ; Ionospheric electron content ; Ionospheric storms ; Latitude ; Longitude ; Magnetic storms ; Observations and Techniques ; Penetration ; Physics ; Physics and Astronomy ; Space Exploration and Astronautics ; Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics ; Storm effects ; Storms ; Total Electron Content ; Wind effects</subject><ispartof>Astrophysics and space science, 2022-10, Vol.367 (10), Article 103</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022. Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1ce9fbf208023b07b43276a31ccda04fb8fbfe5891a22dc400e71fea76e00fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1ce9fbf208023b07b43276a31ccda04fb8fbfe5891a22dc400e71fea76e00fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kalpana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhay Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>Ionospheric response of St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm over Indian low latitude regions</title><title>Astrophysics and space science</title><addtitle>Astrophys Space Sci</addtitle><description>The current work shows the ionospheric response to an intense geomagnetic storm known as St. Patrick’s Day storm which occurred from 17-22 March 2015 using the ionospheric vertical total electron content data over the low latitude Indian stations. We have tried to study how it has influenced the vertical total electron content at four different low latitude stations: Varanasi (Geographic latitude 25°, 19’ N, longitude 82°, 59’ E), Lucknow (Geographic latitude 26°, 50’ N, longitude 80°, 55’ E), Bangalore (Geographic latitude 12°, 58’ N, longitude 77°, 35’ E), and Hyderabad (Geographic latitude 17°, 23’ N, longitude 78°, 27’ E). Various solar and geomagnetic parameters related to the geomagnetic storm have been analyzed to examine the consequences of geomagnetic storms on vertical total electron content. The analysis has been done on account of a comparison of mean total electron content estimated for geomagnetic quiet days and those during the period of the geomagnetic storm 17-21 March 2015. Analysis of vertical total electron content data during the storm period found a negative storm effect on 18 March during daytime at equatorial ionization anomaly station (Varanasi &amp; Lucknow) and Positive storm effect at equatorial station (Hyderabad and Bangalore) which is in agreement with the results of Fagundes et al. ( 2015 ) reported in Brazil region. A strong positive storm effect in the daytime is noticed at EIA stations during 20-21 March which is higher at Lucknow (∼63 TECU) than that at Varanasi (∼37 TECU) whereas equatorial stations Bangalore and Hyderabad were found unaffected. The same results have also been reflected from total electron content data of single PRN 17. These positive and negative ionospheric storm effects observed during the geomagnetic storm have been explained using disturb dynamo electric field, prompt penetration electric field and neutral wind effects. The St. Patrick’s Day storm resulted in a minimum Disturbance Storm Time Index of −234 nT, Auroral Electrojet enhancement of up to 1000 nT, and a maximum enhancement of 33 percent of vertical total electron content (VTEC) values at Bangalore, an equatorial region, in comparison to average quiet days’ VTEC. This is known as the positive storm effect. The cohabitation of the prompt penetration electric field and the long-lasting disturbance dynamo electric field has caused the VTEC to respond favorably throughout the region and disturb dynamo electric field.</description><subject>Astrobiology</subject><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Astrophysics</subject><subject>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</subject><subject>Auroral electrojet</subject><subject>Auroral electrojets</subject><subject>Cohabitation</subject><subject>Cosmology</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Electric fields</subject><subject>Electrojets</subject><subject>Equatorial ionization anomaly</subject><subject>Equatorial regions</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storm effects</subject><subject>Geomagnetic storms</subject><subject>Geomagnetism</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Ionospheric electron content</subject><subject>Ionospheric storms</subject><subject>Latitude</subject><subject>Longitude</subject><subject>Magnetic storms</subject><subject>Observations and Techniques</subject><subject>Penetration</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics and Astronomy</subject><subject>Space Exploration and Astronautics</subject><subject>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</subject><subject>Storm effects</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Total Electron Content</subject><subject>Wind effects</subject><issn>0004-640X</issn><issn>1572-946X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEURoMoWKsv4CrgOvUmmZk0S6l_hYKCCl0ZMpnMOLWd1CRVuvM1fD2fxOgI7lxdcnO-c-FD6JjCiAKI00AhB0mAMQIZ5YLwHTSguWBEZsV8Fw0AICNFBvN9dBDCIj1lIcUAPU5d58L6yfrWYG_D2nXBYlfjuzjCtzqm9fPn-0fA53qLG-tWuulsTGyIzq-we7UeT7uq1R1euje81LGNm8omVdMm1SHaq_Uy2KPfOUQPlxf3k2syu7maTs5mxHAqI6mosbIuawZjYLwEUWaciUJzakylIavLcfq1-VhSzVhlMgAraG21KCxAbfgQnfTetXcvGxuiWriN79JJxQSjIHJGZaJYTxnvQvC2VmvfrrTfKgrqu0fV96hSj-qnR8VTiPehkOCusf5P_U_qC4bsd_8</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar</creator><creator>Patel, Kalpana</creator><creator>Kumar, Sanjay</creator><creator>Singh, Abhay Kumar</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Ionospheric response of St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm over Indian low latitude regions</title><author>Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar ; Patel, Kalpana ; Kumar, Sanjay ; Singh, Abhay Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1ce9fbf208023b07b43276a31ccda04fb8fbfe5891a22dc400e71fea76e00fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Astrobiology</topic><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Astrophysics</topic><topic>Astrophysics and Astroparticles</topic><topic>Auroral electrojet</topic><topic>Auroral electrojets</topic><topic>Cohabitation</topic><topic>Cosmology</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Electric fields</topic><topic>Electrojets</topic><topic>Equatorial ionization anomaly</topic><topic>Equatorial regions</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storm effects</topic><topic>Geomagnetic storms</topic><topic>Geomagnetism</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Ionospheric electron content</topic><topic>Ionospheric storms</topic><topic>Latitude</topic><topic>Longitude</topic><topic>Magnetic storms</topic><topic>Observations and Techniques</topic><topic>Penetration</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics and Astronomy</topic><topic>Space Exploration and Astronautics</topic><topic>Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics</topic><topic>Storm effects</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Total Electron Content</topic><topic>Wind effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kalpana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sanjay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Abhay Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Astrophysics and space science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chaurasiya, Sunil Kumar</au><au>Patel, Kalpana</au><au>Kumar, Sanjay</au><au>Singh, Abhay Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ionospheric response of St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm over Indian low latitude regions</atitle><jtitle>Astrophysics and space science</jtitle><stitle>Astrophys Space Sci</stitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>367</volume><issue>10</issue><artnum>103</artnum><issn>0004-640X</issn><eissn>1572-946X</eissn><abstract>The current work shows the ionospheric response to an intense geomagnetic storm known as St. Patrick’s Day storm which occurred from 17-22 March 2015 using the ionospheric vertical total electron content data over the low latitude Indian stations. We have tried to study how it has influenced the vertical total electron content at four different low latitude stations: Varanasi (Geographic latitude 25°, 19’ N, longitude 82°, 59’ E), Lucknow (Geographic latitude 26°, 50’ N, longitude 80°, 55’ E), Bangalore (Geographic latitude 12°, 58’ N, longitude 77°, 35’ E), and Hyderabad (Geographic latitude 17°, 23’ N, longitude 78°, 27’ E). Various solar and geomagnetic parameters related to the geomagnetic storm have been analyzed to examine the consequences of geomagnetic storms on vertical total electron content. The analysis has been done on account of a comparison of mean total electron content estimated for geomagnetic quiet days and those during the period of the geomagnetic storm 17-21 March 2015. Analysis of vertical total electron content data during the storm period found a negative storm effect on 18 March during daytime at equatorial ionization anomaly station (Varanasi &amp; Lucknow) and Positive storm effect at equatorial station (Hyderabad and Bangalore) which is in agreement with the results of Fagundes et al. ( 2015 ) reported in Brazil region. A strong positive storm effect in the daytime is noticed at EIA stations during 20-21 March which is higher at Lucknow (∼63 TECU) than that at Varanasi (∼37 TECU) whereas equatorial stations Bangalore and Hyderabad were found unaffected. The same results have also been reflected from total electron content data of single PRN 17. These positive and negative ionospheric storm effects observed during the geomagnetic storm have been explained using disturb dynamo electric field, prompt penetration electric field and neutral wind effects. The St. Patrick’s Day storm resulted in a minimum Disturbance Storm Time Index of −234 nT, Auroral Electrojet enhancement of up to 1000 nT, and a maximum enhancement of 33 percent of vertical total electron content (VTEC) values at Bangalore, an equatorial region, in comparison to average quiet days’ VTEC. This is known as the positive storm effect. The cohabitation of the prompt penetration electric field and the long-lasting disturbance dynamo electric field has caused the VTEC to respond favorably throughout the region and disturb dynamo electric field.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10509-022-04137-3</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-640X
ispartof Astrophysics and space science, 2022-10, Vol.367 (10), Article 103
issn 0004-640X
1572-946X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2721075219
source Springer Nature
subjects Astrobiology
Astronomy
Astrophysics
Astrophysics and Astroparticles
Auroral electrojet
Auroral electrojets
Cohabitation
Cosmology
Daytime
Electric fields
Electrojets
Equatorial ionization anomaly
Equatorial regions
Geomagnetic storm effects
Geomagnetic storms
Geomagnetism
Ionization
Ionospheric electron content
Ionospheric storms
Latitude
Longitude
Magnetic storms
Observations and Techniques
Penetration
Physics
Physics and Astronomy
Space Exploration and Astronautics
Space Sciences (including Extraterrestrial Physics
Storm effects
Storms
Total Electron Content
Wind effects
title Ionospheric response of St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm over Indian low latitude regions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A58%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ionospheric%20response%20of%20St.%20Patrick%E2%80%99s%20Day%20geomagnetic%20storm%20over%20Indian%20low%20latitude%20regions&rft.jtitle=Astrophysics%20and%20space%20science&rft.au=Chaurasiya,%20Sunil%20Kumar&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=367&rft.issue=10&rft.artnum=103&rft.issn=0004-640X&rft.eissn=1572-946X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10509-022-04137-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2721075219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-d1ce9fbf208023b07b43276a31ccda04fb8fbfe5891a22dc400e71fea76e00fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2721075219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true