Loading…

yeeyeenation: Country Boys and the Mythopoetics of White Public Culture

Using methods from country music studies, performance studies, hashtag ethnography, and Black Feminist Thought (BFT), this article employs sonic, discursive, and social media analysis to examine performances of White masculinity known as “country boys.” In the opening sections, I describe examples o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Du Bois review 2022-01, Vol.19 (2), p.357-372
Main Author: Putcha, Rumya S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-65ec078f9f0d0e1b649cb37d2ab3f2e61950cfaceabb35e80dce73135fd874a83
container_end_page 372
container_issue 2
container_start_page 357
container_title Du Bois review
container_volume 19
creator Putcha, Rumya S.
description Using methods from country music studies, performance studies, hashtag ethnography, and Black Feminist Thought (BFT), this article employs sonic, discursive, and social media analysis to examine performances of White masculinity known as “country boys.” In the opening sections, I describe examples of country boys that emerge from Texas A&M University (College Station), bringing together confederate statues and the men who identify with and defend such statues. I then turn my focus to critical analysis of one country boy in particular: county music singer, brand progenitor, and Texas icon, Granger Smith a.k.a. Earl Dibbles Jr. Highlighting the importance of country boys to the cultural identity of Texas A&M University, I argue that White publics aggregate and accrue racialized and gendered meaning in social media spaces through signs associated with Smith like the hashtag #yeeyeenation. Such signs are predicated on and normalize a rhetoric—in this case, that something or someone “is not racist”—even in the face of evidence to the contrary. Extending the insights of scholarship on the former Confederacy to contemporary country music cultures and to the present political moment, this article interrogates how White identities and related genealogies in the U.S. context are not simply established to sanitize and excuse expressions of racist, gendered, and exclusionary thought, but are sustained by aestheticized deceptions. I refer to these deceptions as mythopoetics. In this article I demonstrate how Smith’s success, particularly since he is best known for his “redneck” alter-ego, Earl Dibbles Jr., is a testament to the power and reach of mythopoetics in a hegemonic White and heteropatriarchal society. I argue that mythopoetics are not only essential to majoritarian cultural formations today, but also normalize White supremacy to such a point that its violence can circulate without consequence and in plain sight.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1742058X21000400
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2721516934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2721516934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-65ec078f9f0d0e1b649cb37d2ab3f2e61950cfaceabb35e80dce73135fd874a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplT01LAzEUDGLB2voDPHtefS_fOUrxCwoetNBbSLIv0KK7Ndke-u_dUvFSGJhhGGYYxm4R7hHQPHygkRyUXXMEAAlwwaZHqwHl7OW_tusrdl3rFkCAlnbK5geiEV0YNn03Z5Mcvird_PGMrZ6fPhevzfL95W3xuGwS52potKIExmaXoQXCqKVLUZiWhygyJ41OQcohUYhRKLLQJjIChcqtNTJYMWN3p95d6X_2VAe_7felGyc9NxwVaifkmMJTKpW-1kLZ78rmO5SDR_DH0_7stPgF1IFIAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2721516934</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>yeeyeenation: Country Boys and the Mythopoetics of White Public Culture</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Putcha, Rumya S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Putcha, Rumya S.</creatorcontrib><description>Using methods from country music studies, performance studies, hashtag ethnography, and Black Feminist Thought (BFT), this article employs sonic, discursive, and social media analysis to examine performances of White masculinity known as “country boys.” In the opening sections, I describe examples of country boys that emerge from Texas A&amp;M University (College Station), bringing together confederate statues and the men who identify with and defend such statues. I then turn my focus to critical analysis of one country boy in particular: county music singer, brand progenitor, and Texas icon, Granger Smith a.k.a. Earl Dibbles Jr. Highlighting the importance of country boys to the cultural identity of Texas A&amp;M University, I argue that White publics aggregate and accrue racialized and gendered meaning in social media spaces through signs associated with Smith like the hashtag #yeeyeenation. Such signs are predicated on and normalize a rhetoric—in this case, that something or someone “is not racist”—even in the face of evidence to the contrary. Extending the insights of scholarship on the former Confederacy to contemporary country music cultures and to the present political moment, this article interrogates how White identities and related genealogies in the U.S. context are not simply established to sanitize and excuse expressions of racist, gendered, and exclusionary thought, but are sustained by aestheticized deceptions. I refer to these deceptions as mythopoetics. In this article I demonstrate how Smith’s success, particularly since he is best known for his “redneck” alter-ego, Earl Dibbles Jr., is a testament to the power and reach of mythopoetics in a hegemonic White and heteropatriarchal society. I argue that mythopoetics are not only essential to majoritarian cultural formations today, but also normalize White supremacy to such a point that its violence can circulate without consequence and in plain sight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-058X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-0598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1742058X21000400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Boys ; Cultural identity ; Culture ; Ethnography ; Feminism ; Hegemony ; Institutionalism ; Music ; National identity ; Public spaces ; Race ; Racism ; Segregation ; Social media ; Social networks ; Students ; Verbal communication ; White supremacy</subject><ispartof>Du Bois review, 2022-01, Vol.19 (2), p.357-372</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Hutchins Center for African and African American Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-65ec078f9f0d0e1b649cb37d2ab3f2e61950cfaceabb35e80dce73135fd874a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2721516934/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2721516934?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21366,21373,21374,27321,27901,27902,33588,33751,33962,34507,43709,43924,44091,73964,74211,74382</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Putcha, Rumya S.</creatorcontrib><title>yeeyeenation: Country Boys and the Mythopoetics of White Public Culture</title><title>Du Bois review</title><description>Using methods from country music studies, performance studies, hashtag ethnography, and Black Feminist Thought (BFT), this article employs sonic, discursive, and social media analysis to examine performances of White masculinity known as “country boys.” In the opening sections, I describe examples of country boys that emerge from Texas A&amp;M University (College Station), bringing together confederate statues and the men who identify with and defend such statues. I then turn my focus to critical analysis of one country boy in particular: county music singer, brand progenitor, and Texas icon, Granger Smith a.k.a. Earl Dibbles Jr. Highlighting the importance of country boys to the cultural identity of Texas A&amp;M University, I argue that White publics aggregate and accrue racialized and gendered meaning in social media spaces through signs associated with Smith like the hashtag #yeeyeenation. Such signs are predicated on and normalize a rhetoric—in this case, that something or someone “is not racist”—even in the face of evidence to the contrary. Extending the insights of scholarship on the former Confederacy to contemporary country music cultures and to the present political moment, this article interrogates how White identities and related genealogies in the U.S. context are not simply established to sanitize and excuse expressions of racist, gendered, and exclusionary thought, but are sustained by aestheticized deceptions. I refer to these deceptions as mythopoetics. In this article I demonstrate how Smith’s success, particularly since he is best known for his “redneck” alter-ego, Earl Dibbles Jr., is a testament to the power and reach of mythopoetics in a hegemonic White and heteropatriarchal society. I argue that mythopoetics are not only essential to majoritarian cultural formations today, but also normalize White supremacy to such a point that its violence can circulate without consequence and in plain sight.</description><subject>Boys</subject><subject>Cultural identity</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Hegemony</subject><subject>Institutionalism</subject><subject>Music</subject><subject>National identity</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Verbal communication</subject><subject>White supremacy</subject><issn>1742-058X</issn><issn>1742-0598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNplT01LAzEUDGLB2voDPHtefS_fOUrxCwoetNBbSLIv0KK7Ndke-u_dUvFSGJhhGGYYxm4R7hHQPHygkRyUXXMEAAlwwaZHqwHl7OW_tusrdl3rFkCAlnbK5geiEV0YNn03Z5Mcvird_PGMrZ6fPhevzfL95W3xuGwS52potKIExmaXoQXCqKVLUZiWhygyJ41OQcohUYhRKLLQJjIChcqtNTJYMWN3p95d6X_2VAe_7felGyc9NxwVaifkmMJTKpW-1kLZ78rmO5SDR_DH0_7stPgF1IFIAQ</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Putcha, Rumya S.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BSCPQ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>UXAQP</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>yeeyeenation</title><author>Putcha, Rumya S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-65ec078f9f0d0e1b649cb37d2ab3f2e61950cfaceabb35e80dce73135fd874a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Boys</topic><topic>Cultural identity</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Hegemony</topic><topic>Institutionalism</topic><topic>Music</topic><topic>National identity</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Verbal communication</topic><topic>White supremacy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Putcha, Rumya S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Black Studies Center</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ProQuest Black Studies</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Du Bois review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Putcha, Rumya S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>yeeyeenation: Country Boys and the Mythopoetics of White Public Culture</atitle><jtitle>Du Bois review</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>357</spage><epage>372</epage><pages>357-372</pages><issn>1742-058X</issn><eissn>1742-0598</eissn><abstract>Using methods from country music studies, performance studies, hashtag ethnography, and Black Feminist Thought (BFT), this article employs sonic, discursive, and social media analysis to examine performances of White masculinity known as “country boys.” In the opening sections, I describe examples of country boys that emerge from Texas A&amp;M University (College Station), bringing together confederate statues and the men who identify with and defend such statues. I then turn my focus to critical analysis of one country boy in particular: county music singer, brand progenitor, and Texas icon, Granger Smith a.k.a. Earl Dibbles Jr. Highlighting the importance of country boys to the cultural identity of Texas A&amp;M University, I argue that White publics aggregate and accrue racialized and gendered meaning in social media spaces through signs associated with Smith like the hashtag #yeeyeenation. Such signs are predicated on and normalize a rhetoric—in this case, that something or someone “is not racist”—even in the face of evidence to the contrary. Extending the insights of scholarship on the former Confederacy to contemporary country music cultures and to the present political moment, this article interrogates how White identities and related genealogies in the U.S. context are not simply established to sanitize and excuse expressions of racist, gendered, and exclusionary thought, but are sustained by aestheticized deceptions. I refer to these deceptions as mythopoetics. In this article I demonstrate how Smith’s success, particularly since he is best known for his “redneck” alter-ego, Earl Dibbles Jr., is a testament to the power and reach of mythopoetics in a hegemonic White and heteropatriarchal society. I argue that mythopoetics are not only essential to majoritarian cultural formations today, but also normalize White supremacy to such a point that its violence can circulate without consequence and in plain sight.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1742058X21000400</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-058X
ispartof Du Bois review, 2022-01, Vol.19 (2), p.357-372
issn 1742-058X
1742-0598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2721516934
source Cambridge Journals Online; Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Boys
Cultural identity
Culture
Ethnography
Feminism
Hegemony
Institutionalism
Music
National identity
Public spaces
Race
Racism
Segregation
Social media
Social networks
Students
Verbal communication
White supremacy
title yeeyeenation: Country Boys and the Mythopoetics of White Public Culture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=yeeyeenation:%20Country%20Boys%20and%20the%20Mythopoetics%20of%20White%20Public%20Culture&rft.jtitle=Du%20Bois%20review&rft.au=Putcha,%20Rumya%20S.&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=357&rft.epage=372&rft.pages=357-372&rft.issn=1742-058X&rft.eissn=1742-0598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1742058X21000400&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2721516934%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c225t-65ec078f9f0d0e1b649cb37d2ab3f2e61950cfaceabb35e80dce73135fd874a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2721516934&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true