Loading…

An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis

In this article, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs) are proposed to present the qualitative pairwise preference information of decision makers (DMs) with hesitation and probability uncertainty assessments. The measurements and improvements of additive consistency...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IEEE transactions on cybernetics 2022-11, Vol.52 (11), p.12501-12513
Main Authors: Wang, Zhichao, Ran, Yan, Jin, Chuanxi, Chen, Yifan, Zhang, Genbao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-7cbb8733d5d89dec57a27cdc5104c8a44ff7b93fc9587b933846c7baec0bbccd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-7cbb8733d5d89dec57a27cdc5104c8a44ff7b93fc9587b933846c7baec0bbccd3
container_end_page 12513
container_issue 11
container_start_page 12501
container_title IEEE transactions on cybernetics
container_volume 52
creator Wang, Zhichao
Ran, Yan
Jin, Chuanxi
Chen, Yifan
Zhang, Genbao
description In this article, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs) are proposed to present the qualitative pairwise preference information of decision makers (DMs) with hesitation and probability uncertainty assessments. The measurements and improvements of additive consistency and consensus of PHFLPRs are investigated in group decision making (GDM). First, a new concept of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets is defined. Second, the consistency and consensus measurements are established to survey the additive consistency and consensus levels of PHFLPRs. Subsequently, an optimization model is developed to improve the unacceptably additive consistent PHFLPR. By optimizing the unacceptable consensual PHFLPRs with repeating additive consistency improvement, the acceptably additive consistent and consensual PHFLPRs are obtained, based on which DMs' weights are determined objectively and then, the collective PHFLPR is aggregated from individual PHFLPRs. Alternatives' priority weights are derived from the collective PHFLPR as GDM. Finally, an example about failure criticality analysis is given, and a comparison analysis is presented.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3072364
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2726116617</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>9440782</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2726116617</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-7cbb8733d5d89dec57a27cdc5104c8a44ff7b93fc9587b933846c7baec0bbccd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1P3DAUtBAVIMoPQFye1PMu_khi5xgWdkHaqgiBqp4i58UppsHZ2k6l8OP62_DuInzx8_O8mbGHkHNG54zR8vJx8etqzilnc0ElF0V2QE44K9SMc5kfftaFPCZnIbzQtFRqleqIHIuMCpEX5Qn5Xzmo2tZG-8_AYnDBhmgcTqBduzsbF8YA1WbjB43P0A0eVn4YN3Bt0AY7OPiu_1j3G37a-Az3fmh0Y_vEYhFuTbBRuwjL8e1tgnWCjfube28645OQgQfT65h4wk7yLu7Eeou7JlgHS2370Sd3PrlE3ds4QeV0PyWvX8mXTvfBnH3sp-RpefO4uJ2tf6zuFtV6hrwUcSaxaZQUos1bVbYGc6m5xBZzRjNUOsu6Tjal6LDM1bYQKitQNtogbRrEVpySb3ve9A1_RxNi_TKMPpkINZe8YKwomEwotkehH0JIT6w33r5qP9WM1tvQ6m1o9Ta0-iO0NHOxn7HGmE98mWVUKi7eAVo4lhU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2726116617</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis</title><source>IEEE Xplore (Online service)</source><creator>Wang, Zhichao ; Ran, Yan ; Jin, Chuanxi ; Chen, Yifan ; Zhang, Genbao</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhichao ; Ran, Yan ; Jin, Chuanxi ; Chen, Yifan ; Zhang, Genbao</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs) are proposed to present the qualitative pairwise preference information of decision makers (DMs) with hesitation and probability uncertainty assessments. The measurements and improvements of additive consistency and consensus of PHFLPRs are investigated in group decision making (GDM). First, a new concept of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets is defined. Second, the consistency and consensus measurements are established to survey the additive consistency and consensus levels of PHFLPRs. Subsequently, an optimization model is developed to improve the unacceptably additive consistent PHFLPR. By optimizing the unacceptable consensual PHFLPRs with repeating additive consistency improvement, the acceptably additive consistent and consensual PHFLPRs are obtained, based on which DMs' weights are determined objectively and then, the collective PHFLPR is aggregated from individual PHFLPRs. Alternatives' priority weights are derived from the collective PHFLPR as GDM. Finally, an example about failure criticality analysis is given, and a comparison analysis is presented.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-2267</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-2275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2021.3072364</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34033569</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITCEB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway: IEEE</publisher><subject>Additive consistency ; Additives ; consensus ; Consistency ; Decision making ; Failure analysis ; failure criticality analysis ; Fuzzy sets ; group decision making (GDM) ; Indexes ; Linguistics ; Mathematical model ; Optimization ; Optimization models ; probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs) ; Probabilistic logic ; Statistical analysis ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2022-11, Vol.52 (11), p.12501-12513</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-7cbb8733d5d89dec57a27cdc5104c8a44ff7b93fc9587b933846c7baec0bbccd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-7cbb8733d5d89dec57a27cdc5104c8a44ff7b93fc9587b933846c7baec0bbccd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1295-3031 ; 0000-0002-7820-1094</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9440782$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,54796</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhichao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Chuanxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Genbao</creatorcontrib><title>An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis</title><title>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</title><addtitle>TCYB</addtitle><description>In this article, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs) are proposed to present the qualitative pairwise preference information of decision makers (DMs) with hesitation and probability uncertainty assessments. The measurements and improvements of additive consistency and consensus of PHFLPRs are investigated in group decision making (GDM). First, a new concept of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets is defined. Second, the consistency and consensus measurements are established to survey the additive consistency and consensus levels of PHFLPRs. Subsequently, an optimization model is developed to improve the unacceptably additive consistent PHFLPR. By optimizing the unacceptable consensual PHFLPRs with repeating additive consistency improvement, the acceptably additive consistent and consensual PHFLPRs are obtained, based on which DMs' weights are determined objectively and then, the collective PHFLPR is aggregated from individual PHFLPRs. Alternatives' priority weights are derived from the collective PHFLPR as GDM. Finally, an example about failure criticality analysis is given, and a comparison analysis is presented.</description><subject>Additive consistency</subject><subject>Additives</subject><subject>consensus</subject><subject>Consistency</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>failure criticality analysis</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>group decision making (GDM)</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Mathematical model</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization models</subject><subject>probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs)</subject><subject>Probabilistic logic</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>2168-2267</issn><issn>2168-2275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UU1P3DAUtBAVIMoPQFye1PMu_khi5xgWdkHaqgiBqp4i58UppsHZ2k6l8OP62_DuInzx8_O8mbGHkHNG54zR8vJx8etqzilnc0ElF0V2QE44K9SMc5kfftaFPCZnIbzQtFRqleqIHIuMCpEX5Qn5Xzmo2tZG-8_AYnDBhmgcTqBduzsbF8YA1WbjB43P0A0eVn4YN3Bt0AY7OPiu_1j3G37a-Az3fmh0Y_vEYhFuTbBRuwjL8e1tgnWCjfube28645OQgQfT65h4wk7yLu7Eeou7JlgHS2370Sd3PrlE3ds4QeV0PyWvX8mXTvfBnH3sp-RpefO4uJ2tf6zuFtV6hrwUcSaxaZQUos1bVbYGc6m5xBZzRjNUOsu6Tjal6LDM1bYQKitQNtogbRrEVpySb3ve9A1_RxNi_TKMPpkINZe8YKwomEwotkehH0JIT6w33r5qP9WM1tvQ6m1o9Ta0-iO0NHOxn7HGmE98mWVUKi7eAVo4lhU</recordid><startdate>20221101</startdate><enddate>20221101</enddate><creator>Wang, Zhichao</creator><creator>Ran, Yan</creator><creator>Jin, Chuanxi</creator><creator>Chen, Yifan</creator><creator>Zhang, Genbao</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-1094</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221101</creationdate><title>An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis</title><author>Wang, Zhichao ; Ran, Yan ; Jin, Chuanxi ; Chen, Yifan ; Zhang, Genbao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-7cbb8733d5d89dec57a27cdc5104c8a44ff7b93fc9587b933846c7baec0bbccd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Additive consistency</topic><topic>Additives</topic><topic>consensus</topic><topic>Consistency</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>failure criticality analysis</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>group decision making (GDM)</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Mathematical model</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization models</topic><topic>probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs)</topic><topic>Probabilistic logic</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhichao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ran, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Chuanxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yifan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Genbao</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Zhichao</au><au>Ran, Yan</au><au>Jin, Chuanxi</au><au>Chen, Yifan</au><au>Zhang, Genbao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on cybernetics</jtitle><stitle>TCYB</stitle><date>2022-11-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>12501</spage><epage>12513</epage><pages>12501-12513</pages><issn>2168-2267</issn><eissn>2168-2275</eissn><coden>ITCEB8</coden><abstract>In this article, probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs) are proposed to present the qualitative pairwise preference information of decision makers (DMs) with hesitation and probability uncertainty assessments. The measurements and improvements of additive consistency and consensus of PHFLPRs are investigated in group decision making (GDM). First, a new concept of probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets is defined. Second, the consistency and consensus measurements are established to survey the additive consistency and consensus levels of PHFLPRs. Subsequently, an optimization model is developed to improve the unacceptably additive consistent PHFLPR. By optimizing the unacceptable consensual PHFLPRs with repeating additive consistency improvement, the acceptably additive consistent and consensual PHFLPRs are obtained, based on which DMs' weights are determined objectively and then, the collective PHFLPR is aggregated from individual PHFLPRs. Alternatives' priority weights are derived from the collective PHFLPR as GDM. Finally, an example about failure criticality analysis is given, and a comparison analysis is presented.</abstract><cop>Piscataway</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><pmid>34033569</pmid><doi>10.1109/TCYB.2021.3072364</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1295-3031</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7820-1094</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-2267
ispartof IEEE transactions on cybernetics, 2022-11, Vol.52 (11), p.12501-12513
issn 2168-2267
2168-2275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2726116617
source IEEE Xplore (Online service)
subjects Additive consistency
Additives
consensus
Consistency
Decision making
Failure analysis
failure criticality analysis
Fuzzy sets
group decision making (GDM)
Indexes
Linguistics
Mathematical model
Optimization
Optimization models
probabilistic hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (PHFLPRs)
Probabilistic logic
Statistical analysis
Uncertainty
title An Additive Consistency and Consensus Approach for Group Decision Making With Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations and Its Application in Failure Criticality Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A19%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Additive%20Consistency%20and%20Consensus%20Approach%20for%20Group%20Decision%20Making%20With%20Probabilistic%20Hesitant%20Fuzzy%20Linguistic%20Preference%20Relations%20and%20Its%20Application%20in%20Failure%20Criticality%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20cybernetics&rft.au=Wang,%20Zhichao&rft.date=2022-11-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=12501&rft.epage=12513&rft.pages=12501-12513&rft.issn=2168-2267&rft.eissn=2168-2275&rft.coden=ITCEB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TCYB.2021.3072364&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2726116617%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-7cbb8733d5d89dec57a27cdc5104c8a44ff7b93fc9587b933846c7baec0bbccd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2726116617&rft_id=info:pmid/34033569&rft_ieee_id=9440782&rfr_iscdi=true