The New Worries about Science

Science is based on facts —facts that are systematically gathered by a community of enquirers through detailed observation and experiment. In the twentieth century, however, philosophers of science claimed that the facts that scientists “gather” in this way are shaped by the theories scientists acce...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of philosophy 2022-04, Vol.52 (3), p.227-245
Main Author: Kourany, Janet A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Authority
Feminism
Feminist criticism
Philosophers
Science history
Scientists
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Science is based on facts —facts that are systematically gathered by a community of enquirers through detailed observation and experiment. In the twentieth century, however, philosophers of science claimed that the facts that scientists “gather” in this way are shaped by the theories scientists accept, and this seemed to threaten the authority of science. Call this the old worries about science. By contrast, what seemed not to threaten that authority were other factors that shaped the facts that scientists gather—for example, the mere questions scientists pursue. Call this the old nonworries about science. What I suggest is that the old nonworries are turning out to be far more worrisome than the old worries, and I use recent goings-on such as the “Death of Evidence” protests in Canada, the “replication crisis,” and the ongoing feminist critiques of science to illustrate my case. All this raises interesting new questions for philosophers of science to tackle.
ISSN:0045-5091
1911-0820
DOI:10.1017/can.2020.34