Loading…
Most patients reported positively or neutrally of having served as controls in the trials within cohorts design
To evaluate patients’ experience of having served as controls without a notification at the time of randomization in the context of the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design. Patients were asked for their opinion on having served as controls in TwiCs, before and after having been provided the trial re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2022-08, Vol.148, p.39-47 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c7fc8379b64e299ad9f9765e9655cc11bedc6790c117136c2b98123f0b5a52c93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c7fc8379b64e299ad9f9765e9655cc11bedc6790c117136c2b98123f0b5a52c93 |
container_end_page | 47 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 39 |
container_title | Journal of clinical epidemiology |
container_volume | 148 |
creator | Verweij, Maaike E. Gal, Roxanne Burbach, J.P. Maarten Young-Afat, Danny A. van der Velden, Joanne M. van der Graaf, Rieke May, Anne M. Relton, Clare Intven, Martijn P.W. Verkooijen, Helena M. |
description | To evaluate patients’ experience of having served as controls without a notification at the time of randomization in the context of the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design.
Patients were asked for their opinion on having served as controls in TwiCs, before and after having been provided the trial results. Patients had provided broad consent to randomization at cohort entry and had served as controls in one of two TwiCs (an exercise program after breast cancer treatment or radiotherapy dose-escalation for rectal cancer).
Two to 6 years after cohort entry, 15% (n = 16) of all patients remembered having provided broad consent to randomization. Before disclosure of trial results, 47% (n = 52) of patients thought positively, 45% (n = 50) neutrally, and 2% (n = 2) negatively of having served as controls in one of the two trials. Seventeen percent (n = 18) of patients were positive, 65% (n = 71) neutral, and 11% (n = 12) negative about not having been notified when serving as controls. The survey results were comparable after disclosure of trial results.
These results support the use of the TwiCs design with the staged-informed consent procedure. Keeping patients engaged and aware of the consents provided might further improve patients’ experience of serving as controls in TwiCs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2727187827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0895435622000981</els_id><sourcerecordid>2727187827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c7fc8379b64e299ad9f9765e9655cc11bedc6790c117136c2b98123f0b5a52c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6Lr6FzYknluBFig3jfEr0XjRM2npdJdmt1Rga_bfy2bVqyeY4Zl3woPQgpKcEiqu-7w3azvAaHNGGMtJmRPKj9CMVrLKuGL0GM1IpXhWFlycofMQekKoJJKforOCl4XgTMyQe3Uh4rGOFoYYsIfR-QgtHl2w0U6w3mHn8QDb6Ov1vujwqp7ssMQB_JTAOmDjhujdOmA74LgCHL2tU_Vl4yp1jFulyIBbCHY5XKCTLj3C5c85Rx8P9-93T9nL2-Pz3e1LZkpKY2ZkZ6pCqkaUwJSqW9UpKTgowbkxlDbQGiEVSVdJC2FYoyrKio40vObMqGKOrg65o3efWwhR927rh7RSM8nk3hKTiRIHyngXgodOj95uar_TlOi9Z93rX89671mTUifPaXDxE79tNtD-jf2KTcDNAYD0ycmC18EkxQZa68FE3Tr7345vFFyT6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2727187827</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Most patients reported positively or neutrally of having served as controls in the trials within cohorts design</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Verweij, Maaike E. ; Gal, Roxanne ; Burbach, J.P. Maarten ; Young-Afat, Danny A. ; van der Velden, Joanne M. ; van der Graaf, Rieke ; May, Anne M. ; Relton, Clare ; Intven, Martijn P.W. ; Verkooijen, Helena M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Verweij, Maaike E. ; Gal, Roxanne ; Burbach, J.P. Maarten ; Young-Afat, Danny A. ; van der Velden, Joanne M. ; van der Graaf, Rieke ; May, Anne M. ; Relton, Clare ; Intven, Martijn P.W. ; Verkooijen, Helena M.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate patients’ experience of having served as controls without a notification at the time of randomization in the context of the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design.
Patients were asked for their opinion on having served as controls in TwiCs, before and after having been provided the trial results. Patients had provided broad consent to randomization at cohort entry and had served as controls in one of two TwiCs (an exercise program after breast cancer treatment or radiotherapy dose-escalation for rectal cancer).
Two to 6 years after cohort entry, 15% (n = 16) of all patients remembered having provided broad consent to randomization. Before disclosure of trial results, 47% (n = 52) of patients thought positively, 45% (n = 50) neutrally, and 2% (n = 2) negatively of having served as controls in one of the two trials. Seventeen percent (n = 18) of patients were positive, 65% (n = 71) neutral, and 11% (n = 12) negative about not having been notified when serving as controls. The survey results were comparable after disclosure of trial results.
These results support the use of the TwiCs design with the staged-informed consent procedure. Keeping patients engaged and aware of the consents provided might further improve patients’ experience of serving as controls in TwiCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0895-4356</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5921</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35436526</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Breast cancer ; Broad consent ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical trials ; Colorectal cancer ; Consents ; Design ; Epidemiology ; Ethics ; Explicit knowledge ; Informed consent ; Intervention ; Medical ethics ; Participation ; Patients ; Patients' experience ; Questionnaires ; Radiation dosage ; Radiation therapy ; Randomization ; Randomized controlled trials ; Statistical analysis ; Trials within cohorts</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-08, Vol.148, p.39-47</ispartof><rights>2022 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2022. The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c7fc8379b64e299ad9f9765e9655cc11bedc6790c117136c2b98123f0b5a52c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c7fc8379b64e299ad9f9765e9655cc11bedc6790c117136c2b98123f0b5a52c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4966-3502</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35436526$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verweij, Maaike E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gal, Roxanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burbach, J.P. Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young-Afat, Danny A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Velden, Joanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, Rieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relton, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intven, Martijn P.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkooijen, Helena M.</creatorcontrib><title>Most patients reported positively or neutrally of having served as controls in the trials within cohorts design</title><title>Journal of clinical epidemiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><description>To evaluate patients’ experience of having served as controls without a notification at the time of randomization in the context of the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design.
Patients were asked for their opinion on having served as controls in TwiCs, before and after having been provided the trial results. Patients had provided broad consent to randomization at cohort entry and had served as controls in one of two TwiCs (an exercise program after breast cancer treatment or radiotherapy dose-escalation for rectal cancer).
Two to 6 years after cohort entry, 15% (n = 16) of all patients remembered having provided broad consent to randomization. Before disclosure of trial results, 47% (n = 52) of patients thought positively, 45% (n = 50) neutrally, and 2% (n = 2) negatively of having served as controls in one of the two trials. Seventeen percent (n = 18) of patients were positive, 65% (n = 71) neutral, and 11% (n = 12) negative about not having been notified when serving as controls. The survey results were comparable after disclosure of trial results.
These results support the use of the TwiCs design with the staged-informed consent procedure. Keeping patients engaged and aware of the consents provided might further improve patients’ experience of serving as controls in TwiCs.</description><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Broad consent</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Consents</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Explicit knowledge</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical ethics</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients' experience</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiation dosage</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Randomization</subject><subject>Randomized controlled trials</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Trials within cohorts</subject><issn>0895-4356</issn><issn>1878-5921</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6Lr6FzYknluBFig3jfEr0XjRM2npdJdmt1Rga_bfy2bVqyeY4Zl3woPQgpKcEiqu-7w3azvAaHNGGMtJmRPKj9CMVrLKuGL0GM1IpXhWFlycofMQekKoJJKforOCl4XgTMyQe3Uh4rGOFoYYsIfR-QgtHl2w0U6w3mHn8QDb6Ov1vujwqp7ssMQB_JTAOmDjhujdOmA74LgCHL2tU_Vl4yp1jFulyIBbCHY5XKCTLj3C5c85Rx8P9-93T9nL2-Pz3e1LZkpKY2ZkZ6pCqkaUwJSqW9UpKTgowbkxlDbQGiEVSVdJC2FYoyrKio40vObMqGKOrg65o3efWwhR927rh7RSM8nk3hKTiRIHyngXgodOj95uar_TlOi9Z93rX89671mTUifPaXDxE79tNtD-jf2KTcDNAYD0ycmC18EkxQZa68FE3Tr7345vFFyT6Q</recordid><startdate>20220801</startdate><enddate>20220801</enddate><creator>Verweij, Maaike E.</creator><creator>Gal, Roxanne</creator><creator>Burbach, J.P. Maarten</creator><creator>Young-Afat, Danny A.</creator><creator>van der Velden, Joanne M.</creator><creator>van der Graaf, Rieke</creator><creator>May, Anne M.</creator><creator>Relton, Clare</creator><creator>Intven, Martijn P.W.</creator><creator>Verkooijen, Helena M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-3502</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220801</creationdate><title>Most patients reported positively or neutrally of having served as controls in the trials within cohorts design</title><author>Verweij, Maaike E. ; Gal, Roxanne ; Burbach, J.P. Maarten ; Young-Afat, Danny A. ; van der Velden, Joanne M. ; van der Graaf, Rieke ; May, Anne M. ; Relton, Clare ; Intven, Martijn P.W. ; Verkooijen, Helena M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c7fc8379b64e299ad9f9765e9655cc11bedc6790c117136c2b98123f0b5a52c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Broad consent</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Consents</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Explicit knowledge</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical ethics</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients' experience</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiation dosage</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Randomization</topic><topic>Randomized controlled trials</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Trials within cohorts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verweij, Maaike E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gal, Roxanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burbach, J.P. Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young-Afat, Danny A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Velden, Joanne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Graaf, Rieke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Anne M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Relton, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Intven, Martijn P.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verkooijen, Helena M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verweij, Maaike E.</au><au>Gal, Roxanne</au><au>Burbach, J.P. Maarten</au><au>Young-Afat, Danny A.</au><au>van der Velden, Joanne M.</au><au>van der Graaf, Rieke</au><au>May, Anne M.</au><au>Relton, Clare</au><au>Intven, Martijn P.W.</au><au>Verkooijen, Helena M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Most patients reported positively or neutrally of having served as controls in the trials within cohorts design</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2022-08-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>148</volume><spage>39</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>39-47</pages><issn>0895-4356</issn><eissn>1878-5921</eissn><abstract>To evaluate patients’ experience of having served as controls without a notification at the time of randomization in the context of the trial within cohorts (TwiCs) design.
Patients were asked for their opinion on having served as controls in TwiCs, before and after having been provided the trial results. Patients had provided broad consent to randomization at cohort entry and had served as controls in one of two TwiCs (an exercise program after breast cancer treatment or radiotherapy dose-escalation for rectal cancer).
Two to 6 years after cohort entry, 15% (n = 16) of all patients remembered having provided broad consent to randomization. Before disclosure of trial results, 47% (n = 52) of patients thought positively, 45% (n = 50) neutrally, and 2% (n = 2) negatively of having served as controls in one of the two trials. Seventeen percent (n = 18) of patients were positive, 65% (n = 71) neutral, and 11% (n = 12) negative about not having been notified when serving as controls. The survey results were comparable after disclosure of trial results.
These results support the use of the TwiCs design with the staged-informed consent procedure. Keeping patients engaged and aware of the consents provided might further improve patients’ experience of serving as controls in TwiCs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35436526</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.015</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4966-3502</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0895-4356 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2022-08, Vol.148, p.39-47 |
issn | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2727187827 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Breast cancer Broad consent Cancer therapies Clinical trials Colorectal cancer Consents Design Epidemiology Ethics Explicit knowledge Informed consent Intervention Medical ethics Participation Patients Patients' experience Questionnaires Radiation dosage Radiation therapy Randomization Randomized controlled trials Statistical analysis Trials within cohorts |
title | Most patients reported positively or neutrally of having served as controls in the trials within cohorts design |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A37%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Most%20patients%20reported%20positively%20or%20neutrally%20of%20having%20served%20as%20controls%20in%20the%20trials%20within%20cohorts%20design&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20epidemiology&rft.au=Verweij,%20Maaike%20E.&rft.date=2022-08-01&rft.volume=148&rft.spage=39&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=39-47&rft.issn=0895-4356&rft.eissn=1878-5921&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2727187827%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-c7fc8379b64e299ad9f9765e9655cc11bedc6790c117136c2b98123f0b5a52c93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2727187827&rft_id=info:pmid/35436526&rfr_iscdi=true |