Informative priors assess tradeoffs between mark–recapture and telemetry-based fish movement in a large river system

Telemetry and mark-recapture provide movement information, but each approach comes with tradeoffs, potentially producing conflicting understandings of fish movement patterns. Using a Bayesian framework that allows exchanging priors from either method may help assess these inconsistencies. We evaluat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian journal of fisheries and aquatic sciences 2022-11, Vol.79 (11), p.1961-1976
Main Authors: Hansen, Henry H, Kachman, Stephen D, Pegg, Mark A, Charles, Colin, Watkinson, Douglas A, Enders, Eva C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal behavior
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian statistical decision theory
Behavior
Catfish
Channel catfish
Distribution
Estimates
Ictalurus punctatus
Lakes
Marking and tracking techniques
Movement
Physiological aspects
Rivers
Strategic management
Tags
Telemetry
Tradeoffs
Transmitters
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Telemetry and mark-recapture provide movement information, but each approach comes with tradeoffs, potentially producing conflicting understandings of fish movement patterns. Using a Bayesian framework that allows exchanging priors from either method may help assess these inconsistencies. We evaluated channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus movements in the Red River of the North and Lake Winnipeg system, which impacts harvest management across different jurisdictions and affects different ecosystems (e.g., lotic and lentic). Channel catfish were tagged with T-bar tags or acoustic transmitters. The resulting movement data were modeled using a Bayesian multi-state Cormack-Jolly-Seber model to estimate survival, movement, and recapture probabilities. Model estimates with uninformative priors showed a greater tendency of downstream movement from the Red River into Lake Winnipeg for the T-bar tags. In contrast, the telemetry method showed fish predominantly stay in the river. However, exchanging increasingly stronger prior information from the alternative method's model revealed that telemetry movement estimates were less sensitive than the T-bar model to informative priors. Using priors from both methods provided a transparent means to assessing tagging approach tradeoffs quantitatively.
ISSN:0706-652X
1205-7533
DOI:10.1139/cjfas-2021-0238