Loading…
Evaluation of the Relationship between the Milling Breakage Parameters and Mineralogical Data: A Case Study of Three Copper Ores from a Multi-Mineralised Deposit
The study evaluated the milling kinetics of three copper ores, from a multi-mineralised deposit, which were identified as sulphide 1 (with bornite as a dominant copper mineral), sulphide 2 (mainly composed of chalcopyrite) and oxide (with malachite as a dominant copper mineral) and related the break...
Saved in:
Published in: | Minerals (Basel) 2022-10, Vol.12 (10), p.1263 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-1755e10c3704a0fb553ff6b4cf1c6ea8a5d09edaa2f0a7b7b9ff20c675a14a053 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-1755e10c3704a0fb553ff6b4cf1c6ea8a5d09edaa2f0a7b7b9ff20c675a14a053 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1263 |
container_title | Minerals (Basel) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Nghipulile, Titus Moongo, Thomas Dzinomwa, Godfrey Nkwanyana, Sandile Mapani, Benjamin Kurasha, Jaquiline |
description | The study evaluated the milling kinetics of three copper ores, from a multi-mineralised deposit, which were identified as sulphide 1 (with bornite as a dominant copper mineral), sulphide 2 (mainly composed of chalcopyrite) and oxide (with malachite as a dominant copper mineral) and related the breakage parameters to the mineral composition data. Five mono-size fractions between 1000 µm and 212 µm were dry milled for short grinding times in the laboratory ball mill in order to obtain data for predicting breakage rate parameters. The analytical and mineralogical characterisation of the ores were performed using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analysis, optical microscopy analysis and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The mineralogy data showed that quartz was the abundant gangue mineral (average for each ore was above 60% (w/w)), followed by K-feldspar minerals (orthoclase and microcline) which constituted between 4% (w/w) and 6% (w/w) and the remainder are the minor calcite and dolomite minerals which are also in the host rock. The experimental milling kinetics parameters and mineralogical data were used to assess the robustness of the heterogeneous (two-component) and homogeneous (single-component) first-order rate breakage models. The mineral composition data were used for setting up the predictions of breakage parameters in the two-component and single-component first-order breakage models. The experimental data fitted better on the two-component breakage model than the single-component breakage model. These results highlighted the influence of two groups of minerals (generally classed as valuable and gangue minerals). The breakage data showed that the selection function for the hard component (the gangue minerals) has a dominant contribution to the overall selection function of the ores, with SiA correlating fairly well with experimental Si. The parameter a in the Austin empirical breakage model was relatively similar (approximately 1) for all three ores, which confirms similar milling conditions to which the ores were subjected to. The data suggests that there is a relationship between breakage parameter α (material-specific parameter) in the Austin empirical breakage model and brittleness index βi (calculated from the mineralogical composition of the gangue phase). No clear trends could be deduced from the cumulative breakage distributions of the three ores. This highlights the complex |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/min12101263 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2728514307</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2728514307</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-1755e10c3704a0fb553ff6b4cf1c6ea8a5d09edaa2f0a7b7b9ff20c675a14a053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUctOwzAQjBBIIOiJH1iJIwr4USctt9LykloVQZG4RZtk3RrSONgOiM_hT0kph-5ldzSzM4eJolPOLqQcssu1qbngjItE7kVHgqUq5ol83d-5D6Oe92-smyGXAyWOop-bT6xaDMbWYDWEFcETVX_Yr0wDOYUvovqPmJmqMvUSrh3hOy4JHtHhmgI5D1iXHV-Tw8ouTYEVTDDgFYxgjJ7gObTl9yZgsXJEMLZNQw7mjjxoZ9eAMGurYOJ_C-OphAk11ptwEh1orDz1_vdx9HJ7sxjfx9P53cN4NI0LIQYh5qlSxFkhU9ZHpnOlpNZJ3i80LxLCAaqSDalEFJphmqf5UGvBiiRVyLsHJY-js61v4-xHSz5kb7Z1dReZiVQMFO9Llnaq862qcNZ7RzprnFmj-844yzY1ZDs1yF8tv3yx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2728514307</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Relationship between the Milling Breakage Parameters and Mineralogical Data: A Case Study of Three Copper Ores from a Multi-Mineralised Deposit</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Nghipulile, Titus ; Moongo, Thomas ; Dzinomwa, Godfrey ; Nkwanyana, Sandile ; Mapani, Benjamin ; Kurasha, Jaquiline</creator><creatorcontrib>Nghipulile, Titus ; Moongo, Thomas ; Dzinomwa, Godfrey ; Nkwanyana, Sandile ; Mapani, Benjamin ; Kurasha, Jaquiline</creatorcontrib><description>The study evaluated the milling kinetics of three copper ores, from a multi-mineralised deposit, which were identified as sulphide 1 (with bornite as a dominant copper mineral), sulphide 2 (mainly composed of chalcopyrite) and oxide (with malachite as a dominant copper mineral) and related the breakage parameters to the mineral composition data. Five mono-size fractions between 1000 µm and 212 µm were dry milled for short grinding times in the laboratory ball mill in order to obtain data for predicting breakage rate parameters. The analytical and mineralogical characterisation of the ores were performed using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analysis, optical microscopy analysis and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The mineralogy data showed that quartz was the abundant gangue mineral (average for each ore was above 60% (w/w)), followed by K-feldspar minerals (orthoclase and microcline) which constituted between 4% (w/w) and 6% (w/w) and the remainder are the minor calcite and dolomite minerals which are also in the host rock. The experimental milling kinetics parameters and mineralogical data were used to assess the robustness of the heterogeneous (two-component) and homogeneous (single-component) first-order rate breakage models. The mineral composition data were used for setting up the predictions of breakage parameters in the two-component and single-component first-order breakage models. The experimental data fitted better on the two-component breakage model than the single-component breakage model. These results highlighted the influence of two groups of minerals (generally classed as valuable and gangue minerals). The breakage data showed that the selection function for the hard component (the gangue minerals) has a dominant contribution to the overall selection function of the ores, with SiA correlating fairly well with experimental Si. The parameter a in the Austin empirical breakage model was relatively similar (approximately 1) for all three ores, which confirms similar milling conditions to which the ores were subjected to. The data suggests that there is a relationship between breakage parameter α (material-specific parameter) in the Austin empirical breakage model and brittleness index βi (calculated from the mineralogical composition of the gangue phase). No clear trends could be deduced from the cumulative breakage distributions of the three ores. This highlights the complexity of developing relationships between the mineralogical composition data and breakage distributions of the ores which are extracted from the same deposit and with comparable gangue composition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/min12101263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Analytical methods ; Bornite ; Brittleness ; Calcite ; Case studies ; Chalcopyrite ; Comminution ; Composition ; Copper ; Copper ores ; Dolomite ; Dolostone ; Electron microscopy ; Empirical analysis ; Evaluation ; Feldspars ; Fluorescence ; Fractions ; Gangue ; Kinetics ; Light microscopy ; Mathematical models ; Mineral composition ; Mineralization ; Mineralogy ; Minerals ; Mining industry ; Optical microscopy ; Ores ; Orthoclase ; Parameters ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Spectroscopy ; Sulfides ; Sulphides ; X rays ; X-ray fluorescence</subject><ispartof>Minerals (Basel), 2022-10, Vol.12 (10), p.1263</ispartof><rights>2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-1755e10c3704a0fb553ff6b4cf1c6ea8a5d09edaa2f0a7b7b9ff20c675a14a053</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-1755e10c3704a0fb553ff6b4cf1c6ea8a5d09edaa2f0a7b7b9ff20c675a14a053</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7213-7669 ; 0000-0002-5354-3397 ; 0000-0003-4399-2620 ; 0000-0002-2465-0409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728514307/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2728514307?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,25731,27901,27902,36037,36989,44339,44566,74638,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nghipulile, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moongo, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzinomwa, Godfrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nkwanyana, Sandile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mapani, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurasha, Jaquiline</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Relationship between the Milling Breakage Parameters and Mineralogical Data: A Case Study of Three Copper Ores from a Multi-Mineralised Deposit</title><title>Minerals (Basel)</title><description>The study evaluated the milling kinetics of three copper ores, from a multi-mineralised deposit, which were identified as sulphide 1 (with bornite as a dominant copper mineral), sulphide 2 (mainly composed of chalcopyrite) and oxide (with malachite as a dominant copper mineral) and related the breakage parameters to the mineral composition data. Five mono-size fractions between 1000 µm and 212 µm were dry milled for short grinding times in the laboratory ball mill in order to obtain data for predicting breakage rate parameters. The analytical and mineralogical characterisation of the ores were performed using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analysis, optical microscopy analysis and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The mineralogy data showed that quartz was the abundant gangue mineral (average for each ore was above 60% (w/w)), followed by K-feldspar minerals (orthoclase and microcline) which constituted between 4% (w/w) and 6% (w/w) and the remainder are the minor calcite and dolomite minerals which are also in the host rock. The experimental milling kinetics parameters and mineralogical data were used to assess the robustness of the heterogeneous (two-component) and homogeneous (single-component) first-order rate breakage models. The mineral composition data were used for setting up the predictions of breakage parameters in the two-component and single-component first-order breakage models. The experimental data fitted better on the two-component breakage model than the single-component breakage model. These results highlighted the influence of two groups of minerals (generally classed as valuable and gangue minerals). The breakage data showed that the selection function for the hard component (the gangue minerals) has a dominant contribution to the overall selection function of the ores, with SiA correlating fairly well with experimental Si. The parameter a in the Austin empirical breakage model was relatively similar (approximately 1) for all three ores, which confirms similar milling conditions to which the ores were subjected to. The data suggests that there is a relationship between breakage parameter α (material-specific parameter) in the Austin empirical breakage model and brittleness index βi (calculated from the mineralogical composition of the gangue phase). No clear trends could be deduced from the cumulative breakage distributions of the three ores. This highlights the complexity of developing relationships between the mineralogical composition data and breakage distributions of the ores which are extracted from the same deposit and with comparable gangue composition.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Analytical methods</subject><subject>Bornite</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Calcite</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Chalcopyrite</subject><subject>Comminution</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper ores</subject><subject>Dolomite</subject><subject>Dolostone</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Feldspars</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fractions</subject><subject>Gangue</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Light microscopy</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mineral composition</subject><subject>Mineralization</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Mining industry</subject><subject>Optical microscopy</subject><subject>Ores</subject><subject>Orthoclase</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulphides</subject><subject>X rays</subject><subject>X-ray fluorescence</subject><issn>2075-163X</issn><issn>2075-163X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUctOwzAQjBBIIOiJH1iJIwr4USctt9LykloVQZG4RZtk3RrSONgOiM_hT0kph-5ldzSzM4eJolPOLqQcssu1qbngjItE7kVHgqUq5ol83d-5D6Oe92-smyGXAyWOop-bT6xaDMbWYDWEFcETVX_Yr0wDOYUvovqPmJmqMvUSrh3hOy4JHtHhmgI5D1iXHV-Tw8ouTYEVTDDgFYxgjJ7gObTl9yZgsXJEMLZNQw7mjjxoZ9eAMGurYOJ_C-OphAk11ptwEh1orDz1_vdx9HJ7sxjfx9P53cN4NI0LIQYh5qlSxFkhU9ZHpnOlpNZJ3i80LxLCAaqSDalEFJphmqf5UGvBiiRVyLsHJY-js61v4-xHSz5kb7Z1dReZiVQMFO9Llnaq862qcNZ7RzprnFmj-844yzY1ZDs1yF8tv3yx</recordid><startdate>20221006</startdate><enddate>20221006</enddate><creator>Nghipulile, Titus</creator><creator>Moongo, Thomas</creator><creator>Dzinomwa, Godfrey</creator><creator>Nkwanyana, Sandile</creator><creator>Mapani, Benjamin</creator><creator>Kurasha, Jaquiline</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7213-7669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-3397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4399-2620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-0409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20221006</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Relationship between the Milling Breakage Parameters and Mineralogical Data: A Case Study of Three Copper Ores from a Multi-Mineralised Deposit</title><author>Nghipulile, Titus ; Moongo, Thomas ; Dzinomwa, Godfrey ; Nkwanyana, Sandile ; Mapani, Benjamin ; Kurasha, Jaquiline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-1755e10c3704a0fb553ff6b4cf1c6ea8a5d09edaa2f0a7b7b9ff20c675a14a053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Analytical methods</topic><topic>Bornite</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Calcite</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Chalcopyrite</topic><topic>Comminution</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper ores</topic><topic>Dolomite</topic><topic>Dolostone</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Feldspars</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fractions</topic><topic>Gangue</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Light microscopy</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mineral composition</topic><topic>Mineralization</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Mining industry</topic><topic>Optical microscopy</topic><topic>Ores</topic><topic>Orthoclase</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulphides</topic><topic>X rays</topic><topic>X-ray fluorescence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nghipulile, Titus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moongo, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzinomwa, Godfrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nkwanyana, Sandile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mapani, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kurasha, Jaquiline</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nghipulile, Titus</au><au>Moongo, Thomas</au><au>Dzinomwa, Godfrey</au><au>Nkwanyana, Sandile</au><au>Mapani, Benjamin</au><au>Kurasha, Jaquiline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Relationship between the Milling Breakage Parameters and Mineralogical Data: A Case Study of Three Copper Ores from a Multi-Mineralised Deposit</atitle><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle><date>2022-10-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1263</spage><pages>1263-</pages><issn>2075-163X</issn><eissn>2075-163X</eissn><abstract>The study evaluated the milling kinetics of three copper ores, from a multi-mineralised deposit, which were identified as sulphide 1 (with bornite as a dominant copper mineral), sulphide 2 (mainly composed of chalcopyrite) and oxide (with malachite as a dominant copper mineral) and related the breakage parameters to the mineral composition data. Five mono-size fractions between 1000 µm and 212 µm were dry milled for short grinding times in the laboratory ball mill in order to obtain data for predicting breakage rate parameters. The analytical and mineralogical characterisation of the ores were performed using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, scanning electron microscopy energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) analysis, optical microscopy analysis and X-ray diffractometer (XRD). The mineralogy data showed that quartz was the abundant gangue mineral (average for each ore was above 60% (w/w)), followed by K-feldspar minerals (orthoclase and microcline) which constituted between 4% (w/w) and 6% (w/w) and the remainder are the minor calcite and dolomite minerals which are also in the host rock. The experimental milling kinetics parameters and mineralogical data were used to assess the robustness of the heterogeneous (two-component) and homogeneous (single-component) first-order rate breakage models. The mineral composition data were used for setting up the predictions of breakage parameters in the two-component and single-component first-order breakage models. The experimental data fitted better on the two-component breakage model than the single-component breakage model. These results highlighted the influence of two groups of minerals (generally classed as valuable and gangue minerals). The breakage data showed that the selection function for the hard component (the gangue minerals) has a dominant contribution to the overall selection function of the ores, with SiA correlating fairly well with experimental Si. The parameter a in the Austin empirical breakage model was relatively similar (approximately 1) for all three ores, which confirms similar milling conditions to which the ores were subjected to. The data suggests that there is a relationship between breakage parameter α (material-specific parameter) in the Austin empirical breakage model and brittleness index βi (calculated from the mineralogical composition of the gangue phase). No clear trends could be deduced from the cumulative breakage distributions of the three ores. This highlights the complexity of developing relationships between the mineralogical composition data and breakage distributions of the ores which are extracted from the same deposit and with comparable gangue composition.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/min12101263</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7213-7669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5354-3397</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4399-2620</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2465-0409</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-163X |
ispartof | Minerals (Basel), 2022-10, Vol.12 (10), p.1263 |
issn | 2075-163X 2075-163X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2728514307 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Analysis Analytical methods Bornite Brittleness Calcite Case studies Chalcopyrite Comminution Composition Copper Copper ores Dolomite Dolostone Electron microscopy Empirical analysis Evaluation Feldspars Fluorescence Fractions Gangue Kinetics Light microscopy Mathematical models Mineral composition Mineralization Mineralogy Minerals Mining industry Optical microscopy Ores Orthoclase Parameters Scanning electron microscopy Spectroscopy Sulfides Sulphides X rays X-ray fluorescence |
title | Evaluation of the Relationship between the Milling Breakage Parameters and Mineralogical Data: A Case Study of Three Copper Ores from a Multi-Mineralised Deposit |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Relationship%20between%20the%20Milling%20Breakage%20Parameters%20and%20Mineralogical%20Data:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20Three%20Copper%20Ores%20from%20a%20Multi-Mineralised%20Deposit&rft.jtitle=Minerals%20(Basel)&rft.au=Nghipulile,%20Titus&rft.date=2022-10-06&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1263&rft.pages=1263-&rft.issn=2075-163X&rft.eissn=2075-163X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/min12101263&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2728514307%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-1755e10c3704a0fb553ff6b4cf1c6ea8a5d09edaa2f0a7b7b9ff20c675a14a053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2728514307&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |